Display options
Share it on

J Cross Cult Gerontol. 1996 Mar;11(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/BF00116262.

Cultural differences in functional ability among elderly people in Birmingham, England, and Glostrup, Denmark.

Journal of cross-cultural gerontology

K Avlund, M Luck, R Tinsley

Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.

PMID: 24389942 DOI: 10.1007/BF00116262

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to compare patterns of functional ability among four groups of elderly people with different cultural backgrounds. The data originates from (1) a study of 369 65 to 74 year old people in Birmingham, born in England, the West Indies, and Asia, and (2) a study of 734 rafter homogeneous 70 year old people in Glostrup, Denmark. In both surveys functional ability was measured by interviews about Physical and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (PADL and IADL). With regard to PADL there were only a few differences between the four study populations, whereas larger differences were found in IADL. The general pattern was that the Glostrup population had better functional ability than the other study populations and that Asians had the poorest functional ability. The reasons for these differences may arise from different patterns of disease, variations in life style, and differing access to and response from social and health services in the four cultural groups.

References

  1. Aging (Milano). 1991 Mar;3(1):39-49 - PubMed
  2. JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9 - PubMed
  3. J Gerontol. 1984 Nov;39(6):686-91 - PubMed
  4. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Jun;39(6):567-70 - PubMed
  5. J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(2):115-23 - PubMed
  6. Aging (Milano). 1993 Oct;5(5):371-83 - PubMed
  7. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Oct;122(4):644-56 - PubMed
  8. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Apr 15;137(8):845-57 - PubMed
  9. Compr Gerontol B. 1988 Apr;2(1):31-5 - PubMed
  10. J Chronic Dis. 1978;31(9-10):573-80 - PubMed
  11. Dan Med Bull. 1982 Jun;29(5):213-52 - PubMed
  12. Gerontologist. 1992 Jun;32(3):318-26 - PubMed
  13. J Gerontol. 1992 Jul;47(4):S204-11 - PubMed
  14. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Nov;40(11):1183-4 - PubMed
  15. Diabetes Care. 1986 Nov-Dec;9(6):609-13 - PubMed
  16. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(9):895-904 - PubMed
  17. J Gerontol. 1989 Sep;44(5):S196-204 - PubMed
  18. J Gerontol. 1993 Sep;48(5):M196-206 - PubMed
  19. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980 Sep;61(9):395-401 - PubMed
  20. Am J Occup Ther. 1992 Oct;46(10):876-85 - PubMed
  21. Lancet. 1993 Nov 6;342(8880):1142-5 - PubMed
  22. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1991;23(4):193-202 - PubMed
  23. Am J Public Health. 1974 Mar;64(3):261-4 - PubMed
  24. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985 Oct;33(10):698-706 - PubMed
  25. BMJ. 1994 Jul 30;309(6950):327-30 - PubMed
  26. Scand J Soc Med. 1993 Sep;21(3):159-63 - PubMed
  27. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Oct 25;293(6554):1079-82 - PubMed
  28. Scand J Soc Med. 1989;17(1):67-75 - PubMed
  29. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):481-9 - PubMed
  30. WHO Offset Publ. 1984;(84):1-99 - PubMed
  31. Med Care. 1976 Feb;14(2):146-55 - PubMed

Publication Types