Display options
Share it on

Occup Environ Med. 2014 Jun;71:A71. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102362.221.

0084 A Case-Control Study of Occupational Exposure to Metalworking Fluids and Bladder Cancer Risk among Men.

Occupational and environmental medicine

Joanne Colt, Melissa Friesen, Patricia Stewart, Park Donguk, Alison Johnson, Molly Schwenn, Margaret Karagas, Karla Armenti, Richard Waddell, Castine Verrill, Mary Ward, Laura Beane Freeman, Lee Moore, Dalsu Baris, Debra Silverman

Affiliations

  1. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  2. Stewart Exposure Assessments, LLC, Arlington, VA, USA.
  3. Korea National Open University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  4. Vermont Cancer Registry, Burlington, VT, USA.
  5. Maine Cancer Registry, Augusta, ME, USA.
  6. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
  7. New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Concord, NH, USA.

PMID: 25018457 PMCID: PMC4116153 DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102362.221

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Metalworking has been associated with bladder cancer risk in many studies. Metalworking fluids (MWFs) are suspected as the putative exposure, but epidemiologic data are limited. Based on state-of-the-art, quantitative exposure assessment, we examined MWF exposure and bladder cancer risk in the New England Bladder Cancer Study.

METHOD: Male cases (n = 895) and population controls (n = 1031) provided occupational histories and information on use of each of three MWF types: (1) straight (mineral oil, additives), (2) soluble (mineral oil, water, additives), and (3) synthetic (water, organics, additives) or semi-synthetic (soluble/synthetic hybrid), in response to exposure-oriented modules administered during personal interviews. We estimated the probability, frequency, and intensity of exposure to each MWF type and, if probability exceeded 50%, cumulative exposure. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for smoking and other risk factors.

RESULTS: Risk was increased for men reporting use of straight MWFs (OR=1.7, 95% CI=1.1-2.8), with a significant trend with increasing cumulative exposure (p = 0.024). Use of soluble MWFs conferred a 50% elevated risk (95% CI=0.96-2.5). ORs were nonsignificantly elevated for synthetic MWFs, based on small numbers. Men who were never metalworkers, but held jobs with possible exposure to mineral oil, had a 40% increased risk (95% CI=1.1-1.8).

CONCLUSIONS: In the most comprehensive assessment of MWF exposure in a bladder cancer case-control study, exposure to straight MWFs significantly increased bladder cancer risk, as did employment in non-metalworking jobs with possible mineral oil exposure. Our results strengthen prior evidence for mineral oil as a bladder carcinogen.

© 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

References

  1. Cancer Causes Control. 2004 Oct;15(8):759-69 - PubMed
  2. Am J Public Health. 1987 Oct;77(10):1298-300 - PubMed
  3. Lancet Oncol. 2005 Dec;6(12):931-2 - PubMed
  4. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983 Feb;70(2):237-45 - PubMed
  5. Int J Cancer. 1987 Dec 15;40(6):734-40 - PubMed
  6. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002 Dec;28(6):371-85 - PubMed
  7. Occup Environ Med. 1996 Jan;53(1):6-10 - PubMed
  8. Am J Ind Med. 2000 Jul;38(1):90-8 - PubMed
  9. Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Jun;22(3):403-11 - PubMed
  10. Int J Cancer. 1987 Mar 15;39(3):287-92 - PubMed
  11. Am J Ind Med. 2000 Oct;38(4):410-6 - PubMed
  12. Am J Ind Med. 1996 Dec;30(6):664-73 - PubMed
  13. J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Jul;44(7):685-91 - PubMed
  14. Occup Environ Med. 1997 Jun;54(6):443-51 - PubMed
  15. Cancer Res. 1987 Dec 15;47(24 Pt 1):6763-6 - PubMed
  16. Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Jun 15;169(12):1471-8 - PubMed
  17. Int J Cancer. 1988 Mar 15;41(3):371-9 - PubMed
  18. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Aug;126(2):247-57 - PubMed
  19. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1983 Oct;9(5):449-50 - PubMed
  20. Cancer. 1986 Jan 15;57(2):362-7 - PubMed
  21. Am J Ind Med. 2014 Aug;57(8):915-27 - PubMed
  22. Occup Environ Med. 1995 Aug;52(8):557-8 - PubMed
  23. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2003 Nov;18(11):913-20 - PubMed
  24. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1992 Dec;18(6):351-60 - PubMed
  25. Am J Ind Med. 2005 Oct;48(4):249-58 - PubMed
  26. Am J Ind Med. 1998 Mar;33(3):282-92 - PubMed
  27. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2003 Nov;18(11):902-12 - PubMed
  28. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11(11):757-70 - PubMed
  29. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2013;101:9-549 - PubMed
  30. Cancer Causes Control. 2003 Dec;14(10):907-14 - PubMed
  31. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980 Apr;64(4):701-13 - PubMed
  32. Arch Environ Health. 1987 Nov-Dec;42(6):361-6 - PubMed
  33. Occup Environ Med. 2011 Apr;68(4):239-49 - PubMed
  34. J Occup Environ Med. 2005 Aug;47(8):854-8 - PubMed
  35. Am J Ind Med. 2011 Jun;54(6):450-60 - PubMed
  36. Br J Cancer. 1992 Sep;66(3):568-78 - PubMed
  37. Occup Environ Med. 2007 Aug;64(8):520-6 - PubMed
  38. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009 Apr;53(3):271-88 - PubMed
  39. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2003 Nov;18(11):855-64 - PubMed
  40. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009 Sep;6(9):530-41 - PubMed
  41. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1987 Dec;13(6):493-504 - PubMed
  42. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Oct 4;81(19):1472-80 - PubMed
  43. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum. 1984 Apr;33:1-222 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support