J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2014 Sep;22(3):113-20. doi: 10.4250/jcu.2014.22.3.113. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
Validation of global longitudinal strain and strain rate as reliable markers of right ventricular dysfunction: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and outcome.
Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound
Jae-Hyeong Park, Kazuaki Negishi, Deborah H Kwon, Zoran B Popovic, Richard A Grimm, Thomas H Marwick
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. ; Cardiology Division of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. ; Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
PMID: 25309687
PMCID: PMC4192408 DOI: 10.4250/jcu.2014.22.3.113
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is associated with poor prognosis, but RV assessment by conventional echocardiography remains difficult. We sought to validate RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) and global longitudinal strain rate (RVGLSR) against cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and outcome in ICM.
METHODS: In 57 patients (43 men, 64 ± 12 years) with ICM who underwent conventional and strain echocardiography and CMR, RVGLS and RVGLSR were measured off-line. RV dysfunction was determined by CMR [RV ejection fraction (RVEF) < 50%]. Patients were followed over 15 ± 9 months for a composite of death and hospitalization for worsening heart failure.
RESULTS: RVGLS showed significant correlations with CMR RVEF (r = -0.797, p < 0.01), RV fractional area change (RVFAC, r = -0.530, p < 0.01), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, r = -0.547, p < 0.01). RVGLSR showed significant correlations between CMR RVEF (r = -0.668, p < 0.01), RVFAC (r = -0.394, p < 0.01), and TAPSE (r = -0.435, p < 0.01). RVGLS and RVGLSR showed significant correlations with pulmonary vascular resistance (r = 0.527 and r = 0.500, p < 0.01, respectively). The best cutoff value of RVGLS for detection of RV dysfunction was -15.4% [areas under the curve (AUC) = 0.955, p < 0.01] with a sensitivity of 81% and specificity 95%. The best cutoff value for RVGLSR was -0.94 s(-1) (AUC = 0.871, p < 0.01), sensitivity 72%, specificity 86%. During follow-up, there were 12 adverse events. In Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis, impaired RVGLS [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.46, p = 0.030] and impaired RVGLSR (HR = 3.95, p = 0.044) were associated with adverse clinical outcome.
CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional echocardiographic parameters, RVGLS and RVGLSR correlate better with CMR RVEF and outcome.
Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance image; Right ventricle; Strain echocardiography; Systolic dysfunction
References
- N Engl J Med. 1983 Aug 11;309(6):331-6 - PubMed
- Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992 Sep;27(1):28-33; discussion 33-4 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 May 1;39(9):1450-5 - PubMed
- Circulation. 2010 Jan 19;121(2):259-66 - PubMed
- Eur Heart J. 1997 Feb;18(2):276-80 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Mar 19;41(6):1021-7 - PubMed
- J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004 Dec;17(12):1234-8 - PubMed
- Heart. 2006 Apr;92 Suppl 1:i19-26 - PubMed
- J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Jul;23(7):685-713; quiz 786-8 - PubMed
- Am Heart J. 1984 Mar;107(3):526-31 - PubMed
- Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 1;98(5):699-704 - PubMed
- J Heart Lung Transplant. 2000 Feb;19(2):145-54 - PubMed
- Br Heart J. 1992 Jul;68(1):12-5 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 21;47(4):789-93 - PubMed
- Am Heart J. 2004 Feb;147(2):218-23 - PubMed
- Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2004 Dec;20(6):509-16 - PubMed
- Am J Cardiol. 2006 Dec 15;98(12):1660-4 - PubMed
- Circ Heart Fail. 2010 May;3(3):340-6 - PubMed
- Eur Heart J. 2004 Apr;25(8):680-7 - PubMed
- Am J Cardiol. 2003 Apr 15;91(8):1033-7, A9 - PubMed
- Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003 Dec;285(6):H2842-7 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Oct;32(4):948-54 - PubMed
- Heart. 2008 Mar;94(3):e11 - PubMed
- Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jun;93(6):1930-5 - PubMed
- Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006 Dec;7(6):430-8 - PubMed
- Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Sep;2(5):356-64 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Apr;25(5):1143-53 - PubMed
- J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Apr;25(4):428-35 - PubMed
- Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36 - PubMed
Publication Types