Display options
Share it on

J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2014 Sep;22(3):113-20. doi: 10.4250/jcu.2014.22.3.113. Epub 2014 Sep 29.

Validation of global longitudinal strain and strain rate as reliable markers of right ventricular dysfunction: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and outcome.

Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound

Jae-Hyeong Park, Kazuaki Negishi, Deborah H Kwon, Zoran B Popovic, Richard A Grimm, Thomas H Marwick

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. ; Cardiology Division of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
  2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  3. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. ; Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

PMID: 25309687 PMCID: PMC4192408 DOI: 10.4250/jcu.2014.22.3.113

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is associated with poor prognosis, but RV assessment by conventional echocardiography remains difficult. We sought to validate RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) and global longitudinal strain rate (RVGLSR) against cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and outcome in ICM.

METHODS: In 57 patients (43 men, 64 ± 12 years) with ICM who underwent conventional and strain echocardiography and CMR, RVGLS and RVGLSR were measured off-line. RV dysfunction was determined by CMR [RV ejection fraction (RVEF) < 50%]. Patients were followed over 15 ± 9 months for a composite of death and hospitalization for worsening heart failure.

RESULTS: RVGLS showed significant correlations with CMR RVEF (r = -0.797, p < 0.01), RV fractional area change (RVFAC, r = -0.530, p < 0.01), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, r = -0.547, p < 0.01). RVGLSR showed significant correlations between CMR RVEF (r = -0.668, p < 0.01), RVFAC (r = -0.394, p < 0.01), and TAPSE (r = -0.435, p < 0.01). RVGLS and RVGLSR showed significant correlations with pulmonary vascular resistance (r = 0.527 and r = 0.500, p < 0.01, respectively). The best cutoff value of RVGLS for detection of RV dysfunction was -15.4% [areas under the curve (AUC) = 0.955, p < 0.01] with a sensitivity of 81% and specificity 95%. The best cutoff value for RVGLSR was -0.94 s(-1) (AUC = 0.871, p < 0.01), sensitivity 72%, specificity 86%. During follow-up, there were 12 adverse events. In Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis, impaired RVGLS [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.46, p = 0.030] and impaired RVGLSR (HR = 3.95, p = 0.044) were associated with adverse clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional echocardiographic parameters, RVGLS and RVGLSR correlate better with CMR RVEF and outcome.

Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance image; Right ventricle; Strain echocardiography; Systolic dysfunction

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 1983 Aug 11;309(6):331-6 - PubMed
  2. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992 Sep;27(1):28-33; discussion 33-4 - PubMed
  3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 May 1;39(9):1450-5 - PubMed
  4. Circulation. 2010 Jan 19;121(2):259-66 - PubMed
  5. Eur Heart J. 1997 Feb;18(2):276-80 - PubMed
  6. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Mar 19;41(6):1021-7 - PubMed
  7. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004 Dec;17(12):1234-8 - PubMed
  8. Heart. 2006 Apr;92 Suppl 1:i19-26 - PubMed
  9. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Jul;23(7):685-713; quiz 786-8 - PubMed
  10. Am Heart J. 1984 Mar;107(3):526-31 - PubMed
  11. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 1;98(5):699-704 - PubMed
  12. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2000 Feb;19(2):145-54 - PubMed
  13. Br Heart J. 1992 Jul;68(1):12-5 - PubMed
  14. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 21;47(4):789-93 - PubMed
  15. Am Heart J. 2004 Feb;147(2):218-23 - PubMed
  16. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2004 Dec;20(6):509-16 - PubMed
  17. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Dec 15;98(12):1660-4 - PubMed
  18. Circ Heart Fail. 2010 May;3(3):340-6 - PubMed
  19. Eur Heart J. 2004 Apr;25(8):680-7 - PubMed
  20. Am J Cardiol. 2003 Apr 15;91(8):1033-7, A9 - PubMed
  21. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003 Dec;285(6):H2842-7 - PubMed
  22. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Oct;32(4):948-54 - PubMed
  23. Heart. 2008 Mar;94(3):e11 - PubMed
  24. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jun;93(6):1930-5 - PubMed
  25. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006 Dec;7(6):430-8 - PubMed
  26. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Sep;2(5):356-64 - PubMed
  27. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Apr;25(5):1143-53 - PubMed
  28. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Apr;25(4):428-35 - PubMed
  29. Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36 - PubMed

Publication Types