J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014 Oct;44(5):242-50. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2014.44.5.242. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
Early bone healing onto implant surface treated by fibronectin/oxysterol for cell adhesion/osteogenic differentiation: in vivo experimental study in dogs.
Journal of periodontal & implant science
Jung-Seok Lee, Jin-Hyuk Yang, Ji-Youn Hong, Ui-Won Jung, Hyeong-Cheol Yang, In-Seop Lee, Seong-Ho Choi
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Dental Biomaterials Science, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.
- Atomic-Scale Surface Science Research Center, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
PMID: 25368813
PMCID: PMC4216401 DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2014.44.5.242
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of fibronectin and oxysterol immobilized on machined-surface dental implants for the enhancement of cell attachment and osteogenic differentiation, on peri-implant bone healing in the early healing phase using an experimental model in dogs.
METHODS: Five types of dental implants were installed at a healed alveolar ridge in five dogs: a machined-surface implant (MI), apatite-coated MI (AMI), fibronectin-loaded AMI (FAMI), oxysterol-loaded AMI (OAMI), and sand-blasted, large-grit, acid-etched surface implant (SLAI). A randomly selected unilateral ridge was observed for 2 weeks, and the contralateral ridge for a 4-week period. Histologic and histometric analyses were performed for the bone-to-implant contact proportion (BIC) and bone density around the dental implant surface.
RESULTS: Different bone healing patterns were observed according to the type of implant surface 2 weeks after installation; newly formed bone continuously lined the entire surfaces in specimens of the FAMI and SLAI groups, whereas bony trabecula from adjacent bone tissue appeared with minimal new bone lining onto the surface in the MI, AMI, and OAMI groups. Histometric results revealed a significant reduction in the BIC in MI, AMI, and OAMI compared to SLAI, but FAMI demonstrated a comparable BIC with SLAI. Although both the BIC and bone density increased from a 2- to 4-week healing period, bone density showed no significant difference among any of the experimental and control groups.
CONCLUSIONS: A fibronectin-coated implant surface designed for cell adhesion could increase contact osteogenesis in the early bone healing phase, but an oxysterol-coated implant surface designed for osteoinductivity could not modify early bone healing around implants in normal bone physiology.
Keywords: Cell adhesion; Dental implants; Fibronectins; Surface properties; Titanium
References
- J Biomed Mater Res. 1991 Jul;25(7):889-902 - PubMed
- Bone. 2009 Jul;45(1):17-26 - PubMed
- Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155-70 - PubMed
- Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 Nov-Dec;13(6):805-10 - PubMed
- J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Nov;84(5):522-34 - PubMed
- J Dent Res. 2013 Oct;92(10):853-9 - PubMed
- J Dent Educ. 2003 Aug;67(8):932-49 - PubMed
- J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 May;60(2):325-32 - PubMed
- J Biomed Mater Res. 1999 May;45(2):75-83 - PubMed
- J Biomed Mater Res. 1998 Apr;40(1):1-11 - PubMed
- Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Sep-Oct;15(5):675-90 - PubMed
- Biomaterials. 2008 May;29(13):2025-32 - PubMed
- J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2011 Oct;41(5):242-7 - PubMed
- J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Sep 1;82(3):658-68 - PubMed
- Tissue Eng Part A. 2013 Sep;19(17-18):1994-2004 - PubMed
- Eur J Med Res. 2007 Jan 31;12(1):6-12 - PubMed
- Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994 Dec;5(4):202-6 - PubMed
- Biomed Mater. 2010 Aug;5(4):044107 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD003815 - PubMed
- J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;70(8):1827-34 - PubMed
- Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Apr;13(2):144-53 - PubMed
- J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Nov;35(11):1001-10 - PubMed
- Acta Biomater. 2010 Jun;6(6):2274-81 - PubMed
- Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012 Sep 15;22(18):5893-7 - PubMed
- Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Sep;11(9):633-43 - PubMed
- Alpha Omegan. 1992;85(4):61-4 - PubMed
- Int J Prosthodont. 1998 Sep-Oct;11(5):391-401 - PubMed
- J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010 Apr;93(1):289-96 - PubMed
- Biomaterials. 2001 Oct;22(19):2671-82 - PubMed
- Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Oct;19(10 ):1027-33 - PubMed
- Cell. 1992 Apr 3;69(1):11-25 - PubMed
- Dent Mater. 2007 Jul;23(7):844-54 - PubMed
- Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(5):573-9 - PubMed
- J Cell Biochem. 2011 Jun;112(6):1673-84 - PubMed
- Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Aug;15(4):381-92 - PubMed
- Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:22-32 - PubMed
- Tissue Eng Part A. 2011 May;17(9-10):1389-99 - PubMed
- J Orthop Res. 2007 Nov;25(11):1488-97 - PubMed
- J Cell Biochem. 2008 Oct 1;105(2):424-36 - PubMed
- J Bone Miner Res. 2004 May;19(5):830-40 - PubMed
Publication Types