Display options
Cite
Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, et al. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. The TRIPOD Group. Circulation. 2015;131(2):211-9doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014508.
Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G., Moons, K. G. (2015). Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. The TRIPOD Group. Circulation, 131(2), 211-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014508
Collins, Gary S, et al. "Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. The TRIPOD Group." Circulation vol. 131,2 (2015): 211-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014508
Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. The TRIPOD Group. Circulation. 2015 Jan 13;131(2):211-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014508. Epub 2015 Jan 05. PMID: 25561516; PMCID: PMC4297220.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Circulation. 2015 Jan 13;131(2):211-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014508. Epub 2015 Jan 05.

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. The TRIPOD Group.

Circulation

Gary S Collins, Johannes B Reitsma, Douglas G Altman, Karel G M Moons,

Affiliations

  1. From Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. The current affiliation for Drs Collins and Altman is the Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, United Kingdom. The current affiliation for Drs Reitsma and Moons is the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands. [email protected].
  2. From Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. The current affiliation for Drs Collins and Altman is the Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, United Kingdom. The current affiliation for Drs Reitsma and Moons is the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.

PMID: 25561516 PMCID: PMC4297220 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014508

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prediction models are developed to aid health care providers in estimating the probability or risk that a specific disease or condition is present (diagnostic models) or that a specific event will occur in the future (prognostic models), to inform their decision making. However, the overwhelming evidence shows that the quality of reporting of prediction model studies is poor. Only with full and clear reporting of information on all aspects of a prediction model can risk of bias and potential usefulness of prediction models be adequately assessed.

METHODS: The Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) Initiative developed a set of recommendations for the reporting of studies developing, validating, or updating a prediction model, whether for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. This article describes how the TRIPOD Statement was developed. An extensive list of items based on a review of the literature was created, which was reduced after a Web-based survey and revised during a 3-day meeting in June 2011 with methodologists, health care professionals, and journal editors. The list was refined during several meetings of the steering group and in e-mail discussions with the wider group of TRIPOD contributors.

RESULTS: The resulting TRIPOD Statement is a checklist of 22 items, deemed essential for transparent reporting of a prediction model study. The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study regardless of the study methods used. The TRIPOD Statement is best used in conjunction with the TRIPOD explanation and elaboration document.

CONCLUSIONS: To aid the editorial process and readers of prediction model studies, it is recommended that authors include a completed checklist in their submission (also available at www.tripod-statement.org).

© 2015 The Authors.

Keywords: diagnosis; epidemiology; prognosis; research design; risk; statistics

References

  1. BMJ. 2009;338:b604 - PubMed
  2. Eur J Clin Invest. 2012 Feb;42(2):216-28 - PubMed
  3. BMC Med. 2010;8:20 - PubMed
  4. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Feb 7;144(3):201-9 - PubMed
  5. BMJ. 2012;345:e3698 - PubMed
  6. BMJ. 2009;338:b375 - PubMed
  7. BMJ. 2011;343:d5888 - PubMed
  8. JAMA. 1997 Feb 12;277(6):488-94 - PubMed
  9. Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S49-73 - PubMed
  10. Prim Care. 1995 Jun;22(2):341-63 - PubMed
  11. BMC Med. 2012;10:51 - PubMed
  12. Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Apr;21(4):384-90 - PubMed
  13. BMJ. 2012;344:e3186 - PubMed
  14. BMJ. 2009;338:b606 - PubMed
  15. Heart. 2012 May;98(9):683-90 - PubMed
  16. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 May;56(5):441-7 - PubMed
  17. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:18 - PubMed
  18. Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;40(4):1094-105 - PubMed
  19. Heart. 2012 May;98(9):691-8 - PubMed
  20. CMAJ. 2010 Oct 19;182(15):1638-42 - PubMed
  21. PLoS Med. 2010 Feb;7(2):e1000217 - PubMed
  22. Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):805-35 - PubMed
  23. PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):1-12 - PubMed
  24. PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001380 - PubMed
  25. BMJ. 2009;339:b4184 - PubMed
  26. Am Heart J. 1991 Jan;121(1 Pt 2):293-8 - PubMed
  27. Radiology. 2003 Jan;226(1):24-8 - PubMed
  28. Br J Cancer. 1982 Mar;45(3):361-6 - PubMed
  29. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;93(8 Suppl):S138-53 - PubMed
  30. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;66(3):268-77 - PubMed
  31. BMC Med. 2011;9:103 - PubMed
  32. PLoS Med. 2014 Oct;11(10):e1001744 - PubMed
  33. PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001381 - PubMed
  34. Eur J Clin Invest. 2011 Sep;41(9):1004-9 - PubMed
  35. BMJ. 2009;338:b605 - PubMed
  36. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Aug;54(8):774-81 - PubMed
  37. BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8 - PubMed
  38. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64 - PubMed
  39. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Mar 16;130(6):515-24 - PubMed
  40. BMJ. 2012;344:e3318 - PubMed
  41. CJEM. 2002 Mar;4(2):84-90 - PubMed
  42. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Jul;16(1):9-13 - PubMed
  43. PLoS Med. 2009 Feb 3;6(2):e22 - PubMed
  44. CMAJ. 2014 Feb 18;186(3):165-7 - PubMed
  45. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73 - PubMed
  46. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 20;146(6):450-3 - PubMed
  47. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:40 - PubMed
  48. CJEM. 2002 May;4(3):185-93 - PubMed
  49. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2012 Sep;10(3):199-207 - PubMed
  50. Eur J Clin Invest. 2011 Sep;41(9):1010-35 - PubMed
  51. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Aug 17;97(16):1180-4 - PubMed
  52. Crit Care Med. 1984 Nov;12(11):975-7 - PubMed
  53. Circulation. 2010 Aug 17;122(7):682-9, 7 p following p 689 - PubMed
  54. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011;11:62 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support