Display options
Share it on

Front Plant Sci. 2014 Nov 28;5:656. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00656. eCollection 2014.

Metabolic trade-offs between biomass synthesis and photosynthate export at different light intensities in a genome-scale metabolic model of rice.

Frontiers in plant science

Mark G Poolman, Sudip Kundu, Rahul Shaw, David A Fell

Affiliations

  1. Cell Systems Modelling Group, Department of Biological and Medical Science, Oxford Brookes University Oxford, UK.
  2. Department of Biophysics, Molecular Biology, and Bioinformatics, Calcutta University Kolkata, India.

PMID: 25506349 PMCID: PMC4246663 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00656

Abstract

Previously we have used a genome scale model of rice metabolism to describe how metabolism reconfigures at different light intensities in an expanding leaf of rice. Although this established that the metabolism of the leaf was adequately represented, in the model, the scenario was not that of the typical function of the leaf-to provide material for the rest of the plant. Here we extend our analysis to explore the transition to a source leaf as export of photosynthate increases at the expense of making leaf biomass precursors, again as a function of light intensity. In particular we investigate whether, when the leaf is making a smaller range of compounds for export to the phloem, the same changes occur in the interactions between mitochondrial and chloroplast metabolism as seen in biomass synthesis for growth when light intensity increases. Our results show that the same changes occur qualitatively, though there are slight quantitative differences reflecting differences in the energy and redox requirements for the different metabolic outputs.

Keywords: flux balance analysis; metabolic modeling; mitochondrial metabolism; photosynthesis; rice

References

  1. BMC Syst Biol. 2009 Jan 07;3:4 - PubMed
  2. Plant Physiol. 2009 Jan;149(1):585-98 - PubMed
  3. Syst Biol (Stevenage). 2006 Sep;153(5):375-8 - PubMed
  4. Plant Physiol. 2009 Nov;151(3):1570-81 - PubMed
  5. Plant Physiol. 2010 Dec;154(4):1871-85 - PubMed
  6. Plant Physiol. 2010 Sep;154(1):311-23 - PubMed
  7. Mol Syst Biol. 2011 Aug 02;7:518 - PubMed
  8. Plant Physiol. 2014 Mar 4;165(2):917-929 - PubMed
  9. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(7):1647-61 - PubMed
  10. J Theor Biol. 2008 Jun 7;252(3):497-504 - PubMed
  11. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(Database issue):D1085-94 - PubMed
  12. Nature. 2005 Aug 11;436(7052):793-800 - PubMed
  13. Plant J. 2013 Sep;75(6):1050-61 - PubMed
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 3;109(1):339-44 - PubMed
  15. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;37(2):71-119 - PubMed
  16. Eur J Biochem. 2004 Jul;271(14):2905-22 - PubMed
  17. Nat Commun. 2014 Oct 07;5:4893 - PubMed
  18. Plant Physiol. 2013 Jun;162(2):1060-72 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support