Display options
Share it on

Ir Vet J. 2014 Dec 24;67(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13620-014-0027-9. eCollection 2014.

A survey of management practices on Irish dairy farms with emphasis on risk factors for Johne's disease transmission.

Irish veterinary journal

Aideen E Kennedy, Eugene F O'Doherty, Noel Byrne, Jim O'Mahony, E M Kennedy, Riona G Sayers

Affiliations

  1. Animal & Bioscience Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland ; Department of Biological Sciences, Cork Institute of Technology, Bishopstown, Co. Cork, Ireland.
  2. Animal & Bioscience Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
  3. Department of Biological Sciences, Cork Institute of Technology, Bishopstown, Co. Cork, Ireland.

PMID: 25610611 PMCID: PMC4300563 DOI: 10.1186/s13620-014-0027-9

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Johne's disease (JD) is a chronic granulomatous enteritis affecting ruminants. A number of farm management practices are associated with increased risk of JD transmission. The aim of the current study was to document JD-related management practices currently employed on Irish dairy farms. Survey questions focused on calving area (CA), calf and manure management. Independent variables (region, calving-season, enterprise type, herd size and biosecurity status) were used to examine influences on JD associated dependent variables (survey questions). Additionally general biosecurity practices were also examined.

RESULTS: Results showed management practices implemented by Irish dairy farmers pose a high risk of JD transmission. Of the farmers surveyed, 97% used the CA for more than one calving, 73.5% and 87.8% pooled colostrum and milk respectively, 33.7% never cleaned the CA between calving's, and 56.6% used the CA for isolating sick cows. Survey results also highlighted that larger herds were more likely to engage in high risk practices for JD transmission, such as pooling colostrum (OR 4.8) and overcrowding the CA (OR 7.8). Larger herds were also less likely than smaller herds to clean the CA (OR 0.28), a practice also considered of risk in the transmission of JD.

CONCLUSION: Many management practices associated with risk of JD transmission were commonly applied on Irish dairy farms. Larger herds were more likely to engage in high risk practices for JD transmission. Control programmes should incorporate educational tools outlining the pathogenesis and transmission of JD to highlight the risks associated with implementing certain management practices with regard to JD transmission.

Keywords: Biosecurity; Johne’s disease; Management practices; Survey

References

  1. Vet J. 2013 Aug;197(2):259-67 - PubMed
  2. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1996 Jul;12(2):305-12 - PubMed
  3. Nord Vet Med. 1977 Jun;29(6):267-70 - PubMed
  4. Ir Vet J. 2009 Jun 01;62(6):398-405 - PubMed
  5. Prev Vet Med. 2005 Sep 12;70(3-4):279-91 - PubMed
  6. Vaccine. 1998 Mar;16(5):507-16 - PubMed
  7. Vet J. 2012 Nov;194(2):143-50 - PubMed
  8. Am J Vet Res. 1995 Oct;56(10):1322-4 - PubMed
  9. Vet Rec. 2012 Sep 22;171(12):296 - PubMed
  10. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000 May 1;216(9):1450-7 - PubMed
  11. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003 Dec 15;223(12):1757-63 - PubMed
  12. Vet Microbiol. 2000 Dec 20;77(3-4):429-42 - PubMed
  13. Prev Vet Med. 2013 May 1;109(3-4):343-8 - PubMed
  14. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009 Apr;41(4):553-7 - PubMed
  15. Aust Vet J. 2005 Jan-Feb;83(1-2):85-90 - PubMed
  16. Ir Vet J. 2009 Sep 01;62(9):597-606 - PubMed
  17. J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1307-15 - PubMed
  18. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997 Oct 15;211(8):1029-35 - PubMed
  19. Vet J. 2014 May;200(2):261-9 - PubMed
  20. J Dairy Sci. 2000 Oct;83(10):2380-6 - PubMed
  21. Prev Vet Med. 2007 Feb 16;78(2):97-117 - PubMed
  22. Prev Vet Med. 1998 Dec 1;37(1-4):41-54 - PubMed
  23. Vet J. 2010 Apr;184(1):37-44 - PubMed
  24. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2003 Oct;50(8):372-7 - PubMed
  25. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2008 Mar;24(1):87-104 - PubMed
  26. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1989 May 15;194(10):1423-6 - PubMed
  27. Vet Rec. 2011 Apr 16;168(15):410 - PubMed
  28. J Dairy Sci. 2008 Dec;91(12):4599-609 - PubMed
  29. Prev Vet Med. 2002 Sep 30;55(2):137-53 - PubMed
  30. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004 Jul 1;225(1):97-101 - PubMed
  31. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2011 Nov;27(3):525-35, v - PubMed
  32. Ir Vet J. 2009 Apr 01;62 Suppl 4:S5-14 - PubMed
  33. N Z Vet J. 2009 Feb;57(1):34-43 - PubMed
  34. Prev Vet Med. 1999 Jun 11;40(3-4):179-92 - PubMed
  35. Ir Vet J. 2008 Jul 01;61(7):464-7 - PubMed
  36. Prev Vet Med. 2009 Jan 1;88(1):32-41 - PubMed
  37. J Dairy Sci. 2008 Aug;91(8):3245-58 - PubMed
  38. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1996 Jul;12(2):345-56 - PubMed
  39. Rev Sci Tech. 2001 Apr;20(1):133-50 - PubMed
  40. Prev Vet Med. 2013 Oct 1;112(1-2):99-108 - PubMed
  41. Res Vet Sci. 2013 Oct;95(2):398-404 - PubMed
  42. Prev Vet Med. 2009 Jan 1;88(1):1-14 - PubMed
  43. Can Vet J. 2006 Oct;47(10):981-91 - PubMed
  44. Prev Vet Med. 2005 Dec 12;72(3-4):291-309 - PubMed
  45. BMC Vet Res. 2014 Jun 14;10:132 - PubMed
  46. J Vet Intern Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;26(1):32-45 - PubMed
  47. J Dairy Sci. 2008 Dec;91(12):4610-5 - PubMed
  48. Prev Vet Med. 2000 Aug 10;46(3):171-81 - PubMed
  49. Infect Immun. 1983 Sep;41(3):1118-31 - PubMed
  50. Prev Vet Med. 2010 Jul 1;95(3-4):198-207 - PubMed
  51. J Dairy Sci. 2009 Oct;92(10):4929-36 - PubMed

Publication Types