Display options
Share it on

J Thorac Dis. 2015 Mar;7(3):252-63. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.27.

Diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of thoracic disease

Wei Lu, Jun Zheng, Xu-Dong Pan, Ming-Duo Zhang, Tie-Yuan Zhu, Bin Li, Li-Zhong Sun

Affiliations

  1. 1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing 100029, China ; 2 Department of Cardiology, 3 Department of Pediatric Heart Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China.

PMID: 25922701 PMCID: PMC4387422 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.27

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have addressed the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to assess acute cardiac allograft rejection (ACAR) compared with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). But the methodological heterogeneity limited the clinical application of CMR. Accordingly, we have sought a comprehensive, systematic literature review and meta-analysis for the purpose.

METHODS: Studies prior to September 1, 2014 identified by Medline/PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrance search and citation tracking were examined by two independent reviewers. A study was included if a CMR was used as a diagnostic test for the detection of ACAR.

RESULTS: Of the seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Only four studies using T2 relaxation time as a CMR parameter could be pooled results, because the number of studies using other parameters was less than three. By using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model, meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 90% [95% confidence interval (CI), 79% to 97%], a pooled specificity of 83% (95% CI, 78% to 88%), and a pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 61.66 (95% CI, 18.09 to 210.10).

CONCLUSIONS: CMR seems to have a high sensitivity and moderate specificity in the diagnosis of ACAR. However, as a result of CMR for diagnostic ACAR should be comprehensively considered by physicians and imaging experts in the context of clinical presentations and imaging feature. Further investigations are still required to test different parameters and study condition.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; graft rejection; heart transplantation (HTX)

References

  1. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004 Jul;17 (7):788-802 - PubMed
  2. Ital Heart J. 2002 Jun;3(6):348-53 - PubMed
  3. Biostatistics. 2000 Sep;1(3):247-62 - PubMed
  4. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Nov;24(11):1710-20 - PubMed
  5. Eur Heart J. 2009 Oct;30(20):2493-537 - PubMed
  6. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Jul;31(7):708-14 - PubMed
  7. J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Sep;28(9):1323-8 - PubMed
  8. Am J Transplant. 2014 Nov;14(11):2607-16 - PubMed
  9. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006 Oct;19(10 ):1295-300 - PubMed
  10. Stat Med. 1983 Jan-Mar;2(1):33-40 - PubMed
  11. Invest Radiol. 1985 Nov;20(8):796-802 - PubMed
  12. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Nov;5(6):782-90 - PubMed
  13. Am J Cardiol. 1987 Jul 1;60(1):130-6 - PubMed
  14. Stat Med. 1993 Jul 30;12 (14 ):1293-316 - PubMed
  15. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006 Mar;21(2):127-31 - PubMed
  16. Circulation. 1986 Jul;74(1):145-56 - PubMed
  17. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36 - PubMed
  18. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1525-37 - PubMed
  19. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 Nov-Dec;12 (6 Pt 1):1009-17 - PubMed
  20. Circulation. 1981 Aug;64(2 Pt 2):II217-20 - PubMed
  21. Transplant Proc. 2013 Mar;45(2):787-91 - PubMed
  22. Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9(11):2587-96 - PubMed
  23. Hum Pathol. 1994 Mar;25(3):323-6 - PubMed
  24. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007 Aug;131(8):1169-91 - PubMed
  25. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1990 Jan-Feb;14(1):77-81 - PubMed
  26. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Jan;12(1):45-51 - PubMed
  27. Phys Ther. 2010 Oct;90(10):1383-403 - PubMed
  28. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Oct;29(10):1089-103 - PubMed
  29. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Mar 1;37(3):825-31 - PubMed
  30. J Heart Transplant. 1990 Nov-Dec;9(6):587-93 - PubMed
  31. J Heart Transplant. 1988 Jul-Aug;7(4):274-9 - PubMed
  32. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 May-Jun;12(3):403-10 - PubMed
  33. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Apr;23 (5):1156-61 - PubMed
  34. Circulation. 1985 Sep;72(3 Pt 2):II231-6 - PubMed
  35. J Transplant. 2013;2013:236720 - PubMed
  36. Radiology. 1985 Dec;157(3):697-702 - PubMed
  37. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jun 7;45(11):1815-22 - PubMed
  38. Transplant Proc. 1987 Feb;19(1 Pt 2):1062-4 - PubMed
  39. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jul 12;6:31 - PubMed
  40. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Jul;52(1):184-8 - PubMed
  41. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Jul 20;16:52 - PubMed
  42. Transplant Proc. 2003 Aug;35(5):1962-4 - PubMed
  43. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Aug;32(2):405-12 - PubMed
  44. Eur Radiol. 2014 Oct;24(10):2360-71 - PubMed
  45. Transplant Proc. 1989 Feb;21(1 Pt 3):2537-43 - PubMed
  46. Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;37(5):1148-57 - PubMed
  47. Circulation. 2008 Oct 21;118(17):1722-8 - PubMed
  48. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 May 1;6(3):e20 - PubMed
  49. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Apr 15;103(8):1149-53 - PubMed
  50. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996 May;15(5):506-15 - PubMed
  51. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Jan;19(1):43-7 - PubMed
  52. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993 Mar-Apr;17 (2):237-44 - PubMed
  53. Circulation. 2001 Sep 18;104(12 Suppl 1):I184-91 - PubMed
  54. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001 May;20(5):497-502 - PubMed
  55. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 Jan-Feb;12(1 Pt 1):63-7 - PubMed
  56. Transplant Proc. 1998 Aug;30(5):1933-5 - PubMed
  57. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):119-30; discussion 131-2 - PubMed
  58. Medicine (Baltimore). 1999 Jul;78(4):270-83 - PubMed
  59. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Feb;18(2):107-15 - PubMed
  60. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Jul;28(7):704-9 - PubMed
  61. Lancet. 2004 Jun 26;363(9427):2162-71 - PubMed

Publication Types