J Thorac Dis. 2015 Mar;7(3):252-63. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.27.
Diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal of thoracic disease
Wei Lu, Jun Zheng, Xu-Dong Pan, Ming-Duo Zhang, Tie-Yuan Zhu, Bin Li, Li-Zhong Sun
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing 100029, China ; 2 Department of Cardiology, 3 Department of Pediatric Heart Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China.
PMID: 25922701
PMCID: PMC4387422 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.27
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have addressed the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to assess acute cardiac allograft rejection (ACAR) compared with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). But the methodological heterogeneity limited the clinical application of CMR. Accordingly, we have sought a comprehensive, systematic literature review and meta-analysis for the purpose.
METHODS: Studies prior to September 1, 2014 identified by Medline/PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrance search and citation tracking were examined by two independent reviewers. A study was included if a CMR was used as a diagnostic test for the detection of ACAR.
RESULTS: Of the seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Only four studies using T2 relaxation time as a CMR parameter could be pooled results, because the number of studies using other parameters was less than three. By using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model, meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 90% [95% confidence interval (CI), 79% to 97%], a pooled specificity of 83% (95% CI, 78% to 88%), and a pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 61.66 (95% CI, 18.09 to 210.10).
CONCLUSIONS: CMR seems to have a high sensitivity and moderate specificity in the diagnosis of ACAR. However, as a result of CMR for diagnostic ACAR should be comprehensively considered by physicians and imaging experts in the context of clinical presentations and imaging feature. Further investigations are still required to test different parameters and study condition.
Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; graft rejection; heart transplantation (HTX)
References
- J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004 Jul;17 (7):788-802 - PubMed
- Ital Heart J. 2002 Jun;3(6):348-53 - PubMed
- Biostatistics. 2000 Sep;1(3):247-62 - PubMed
- J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Nov;24(11):1710-20 - PubMed
- Eur Heart J. 2009 Oct;30(20):2493-537 - PubMed
- J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Jul;31(7):708-14 - PubMed
- J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Sep;28(9):1323-8 - PubMed
- Am J Transplant. 2014 Nov;14(11):2607-16 - PubMed
- J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006 Oct;19(10 ):1295-300 - PubMed
- Stat Med. 1983 Jan-Mar;2(1):33-40 - PubMed
- Invest Radiol. 1985 Nov;20(8):796-802 - PubMed
- Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Nov;5(6):782-90 - PubMed
- Am J Cardiol. 1987 Jul 1;60(1):130-6 - PubMed
- Stat Med. 1993 Jul 30;12 (14 ):1293-316 - PubMed
- Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006 Mar;21(2):127-31 - PubMed
- Circulation. 1986 Jul;74(1):145-56 - PubMed
- Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36 - PubMed
- Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1525-37 - PubMed
- J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 Nov-Dec;12 (6 Pt 1):1009-17 - PubMed
- Circulation. 1981 Aug;64(2 Pt 2):II217-20 - PubMed
- Transplant Proc. 2013 Mar;45(2):787-91 - PubMed
- Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9(11):2587-96 - PubMed
- Hum Pathol. 1994 Mar;25(3):323-6 - PubMed
- Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007 Aug;131(8):1169-91 - PubMed
- J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1990 Jan-Feb;14(1):77-81 - PubMed
- Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Jan;12(1):45-51 - PubMed
- Phys Ther. 2010 Oct;90(10):1383-403 - PubMed
- J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Oct;29(10):1089-103 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Mar 1;37(3):825-31 - PubMed
- J Heart Transplant. 1990 Nov-Dec;9(6):587-93 - PubMed
- J Heart Transplant. 1988 Jul-Aug;7(4):274-9 - PubMed
- J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 May-Jun;12(3):403-10 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Apr;23 (5):1156-61 - PubMed
- Circulation. 1985 Sep;72(3 Pt 2):II231-6 - PubMed
- J Transplant. 2013;2013:236720 - PubMed
- Radiology. 1985 Dec;157(3):697-702 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jun 7;45(11):1815-22 - PubMed
- Transplant Proc. 1987 Feb;19(1 Pt 2):1062-4 - PubMed
- BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jul 12;6:31 - PubMed
- Am J Cardiol. 1983 Jul;52(1):184-8 - PubMed
- J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Jul 20;16:52 - PubMed
- Transplant Proc. 2003 Aug;35(5):1962-4 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Aug;32(2):405-12 - PubMed
- Eur Radiol. 2014 Oct;24(10):2360-71 - PubMed
- Transplant Proc. 1989 Feb;21(1 Pt 3):2537-43 - PubMed
- Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;37(5):1148-57 - PubMed
- Circulation. 2008 Oct 21;118(17):1722-8 - PubMed
- Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 May 1;6(3):e20 - PubMed
- Am J Cardiol. 2009 Apr 15;103(8):1149-53 - PubMed
- J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996 May;15(5):506-15 - PubMed
- J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Jan;19(1):43-7 - PubMed
- J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993 Mar-Apr;17 (2):237-44 - PubMed
- Circulation. 2001 Sep 18;104(12 Suppl 1):I184-91 - PubMed
- J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001 May;20(5):497-502 - PubMed
- J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 Jan-Feb;12(1 Pt 1):63-7 - PubMed
- Transplant Proc. 1998 Aug;30(5):1933-5 - PubMed
- J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):119-30; discussion 131-2 - PubMed
- Medicine (Baltimore). 1999 Jul;78(4):270-83 - PubMed
- J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Feb;18(2):107-15 - PubMed
- J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Jul;28(7):704-9 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2004 Jun 26;363(9427):2162-71 - PubMed
Publication Types