Display options
Share it on

Endosc Int Open. 2015 Jun;3(3):E216-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391480. Epub 2015 May 06.

Double-balloon enteroscopy for ERCP in patients with Billroth II anatomy: results of a large series of papillary large-balloon dilation for biliary stone removal.

Endoscopy international open

Chi-Liang Cheng, Nai-Jen Liu, Jui-Hsiang Tang, Ming-Chin Yu, Yi-Ning Tsui, Fang-Yu Hsu, Ching-Song Lee, Cheng-Hui Lin

Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  2. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

PMID: 26171434 PMCID: PMC4486040 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391480

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Data on double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE)-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogrphy (ERCP) in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy and the use of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) for the removal of common bile duct stones in Billroth II anatomy are limited. The aims of the study were to evaluate the success of DBE-assisted ERCP in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy and examine the efficacy of EPLBD ( ≥ 10 mm) for the removal of common bile duct stones.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 77 patients with Billroth II gastrectomy in whom standard ERCP had failed underwent DBE-assisted ERCP. DBE success was defined as visualizing the papilla and ERCP success as completing the intended intervention. The clinical results of EPLBD for the removal of common bile duct stones were analyzed.

RESULTS: DBE was successful in 73 of 77 patients (95 %), and ERCP success was achieved in 67 of these 73 (92 %). Therefore, the rate of successful DBE-assisted ERCP was 87 % (67 of a total of 77 patients). The reasons for ERCP failure (n = 10) included tumor obstruction (n = 2), adhesion obstruction (n = 2), failed cannulation (n = 3), failed stone removal (n = 2), and bowel perforation (n = 1). Overall DBE-assisted ERCP complications occurred in 5 of 77 patients (6.5 %). A total of 48 patients (34 male, mean age 75.5 years) with common bile duct stones underwent EPLBD. Complete stone removal in the first session was accomplished in 36 patients (75 %); mechanical lithotripsy was required in 1 patient. EPLBD-related mild perforation occurred in 2 patients (4 %). No acute pancreatitis occurred.

CONCLUSIONS: DBE permits therapeutic ERCP in patients who have a difficult Billroth II gastrectomy with a high success rate and acceptable complication rates. EPLBD is effective and safe for the removal of common bile duct stones in patients with Billroth II anatomy.

References

  1. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Aug;22(8):1210-3 - PubMed
  2. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 14;19(46):8580-94 - PubMed
  3. Gastroenterology. 2004 Nov;127(5):1291-9 - PubMed
  4. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 17;13:15 - PubMed
  5. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Feb;53(2):216-20 - PubMed
  6. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):560-5 - PubMed
  7. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jan;94(1):144-8 - PubMed
  8. Clin Endosc. 2012 Nov;45(4):397-403 - PubMed
  9. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Apr;77(4):593-600 - PubMed
  10. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;27(2):256-60 - PubMed
  11. Lancet. 1997 Apr 19;349(9059):1124-9 - PubMed
  12. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 28;16(36):4594-8 - PubMed
  13. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005 Jul;87(4):274-6 - PubMed
  14. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Feb;57(2):151-5 - PubMed
  15. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011 Jun 13;11:69 - PubMed
  16. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Nov;64(5):740-50 - PubMed
  17. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jun;67(7):1046-52 - PubMed
  18. Endoscopy. 1997 Feb;29(2):82-5 - PubMed
  19. Endoscopy. 1999 Sep;31(7):546-9 - PubMed
  20. Endoscopy. 2014 Jul;46(7):560-72 - PubMed
  21. Gut. 2001 Nov;49(5):686-91 - PubMed
  22. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan;49(1):121-8 - PubMed
  23. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan;105(1):93-9 - PubMed
  24. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 14;18(46):6843-9 - PubMed
  25. Gastroenterology. 2013 Feb;144(2):341-345.e1 - PubMed
  26. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 May-Jun;37(3):383-93 - PubMed
  27. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep;47(8-9):1071-7 - PubMed
  28. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov;25(11):615-9 - PubMed
  29. Endoscopy. 2009 Oct;41(10):849-54 - PubMed
  30. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Nov;70(5):915-22 - PubMed

Publication Types