Display options
Cite
Lim HC, Lee JS, Choi SH, et al. The effect of overlaying titanium mesh with collagen membrane for ridge preservation. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2015;45(4):128-35doi: 10.5051/jpis.2015.45.4.128.
Lim, H. C., Lee, J. S., Choi, S. H., & Jung, U. W. (2015). The effect of overlaying titanium mesh with collagen membrane for ridge preservation. Journal of periodontal & implant science, 45(4), 128-35. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2015.45.4.128
Lim, Hyun-Chang, et al. "The effect of overlaying titanium mesh with collagen membrane for ridge preservation." Journal of periodontal & implant science vol. 45,4 (2015): 128-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2015.45.4.128
Lim HC, Lee JS, Choi SH, Jung UW. The effect of overlaying titanium mesh with collagen membrane for ridge preservation. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2015 Aug;45(4):128-35. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2015.45.4.128. Epub 2015 Aug 27. PMID: 26339522; PMCID: PMC4556798.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2015 Aug;45(4):128-35. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2015.45.4.128. Epub 2015 Aug 27.

The effect of overlaying titanium mesh with collagen membrane for ridge preservation.

Journal of periodontal & implant science

Hyun-Chang Lim, Jung-Seok Lee, Seong-Ho Choi, Ui-Won Jung

Affiliations

  1. Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.

PMID: 26339522 PMCID: PMC4556798 DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2015.45.4.128

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of overlaying titanium mesh (TM) with an adjunctive collagen membrane (CM) for preserving the buccal bone when used in association with immediate implant placement in dogs.

METHODS: Immediate implant placements were performed in the mesial sockets of the third premolars of five dogs. At one site the TM was attached to the fixture with the aid of its own stabilizers and then covered by a CM (CM group), while the contralateral site received only TM (TM group). Biopsy specimens were retrieved for histologic and histomorphometric analyses after 16 weeks.

RESULTS: All samples exhibited pronounced buccal bone resorption, and a high rate of TM exposure was noted (in three and four cases of the five samples in each of the TM and CM groups, respectively). A dense fibrous tissue with little vascularity or cellularity had infiltrated through the pores of the TM irrespective of the presence of a CM. The distances between the fixture platform and the first bone-implant contact and the bone crest did not differ significantly between the TM and CM groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the additional use of a CM over TM does not offer added benefit for mucosal healing and buccal bone preservation.

Keywords: Bone regeneration; Bone resorption; Dental implants; Postoperative complications; Tooth extraction

References

  1. J Periodontol. 2011 Mar;82(3):377-87 - PubMed
  2. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Nov-Dec;29(6):1354-63 - PubMed
  3. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Dec;144(12):1349-57 - PubMed
  4. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Apr;14 (2):304-11 - PubMed
  5. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;70(4):803-10 - PubMed
  6. J Dent Res. 2014 Feb;93(2):109-16 - PubMed
  7. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985 Feb;43(2):87-91 - PubMed
  8. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998 Apr;18(2):117-27 - PubMed
  9. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Feb;66(2):235-45 - PubMed
  10. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2013 Apr;43(2):64-71 - PubMed
  11. J Prosthodont Res. 2013 Jan;57(1):3-14 - PubMed
  12. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jun;67(6):1218-25 - PubMed
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988 May;81(5):672-6 - PubMed
  14. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994 Jun;5(2):75-82 - PubMed
  15. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jan;22(1):1-8 - PubMed
  16. J Periodontol. 2003 Jul;74(7):965-75 - PubMed
  17. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18(3):286-94 - PubMed
  18. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 May-Jun;11(3):387-94 - PubMed
  19. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Dec;11(6):546-54 - PubMed
  20. J Oral Implantol. 2001;27(6):287-92 - PubMed
  21. Bone. 2004 Nov;35(5):1003-12 - PubMed
  22. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2011 Dec;41(6):285-92 - PubMed
  23. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32(5):237-47 - PubMed
  24. J Periodontol. 2008 Nov;79(11):2093-103 - PubMed
  25. J Oral Implantol. 2003;29(2):86-90 - PubMed
  26. Implant Dent. 2006 Mar;15(1):8-17 - PubMed
  27. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1992 Aug-Sep;20(6):257-60 - PubMed
  28. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Feb;18(1):86-94 - PubMed
  29. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:186-217 - PubMed
  30. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:147-56 - PubMed
  31. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Dec;90(6):530-8 - PubMed
  32. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Jan-Feb;33(1):71-8 - PubMed
  33. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jan;19(1):32-41 - PubMed
  34. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):1119-28 - PubMed
  35. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Feb;(275):280-6 - PubMed
  36. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jan;24(1):7-12 - PubMed
  37. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e652-60 - PubMed
  38. J Clin Periodontol. 1991 Jan;18(1):60-4 - PubMed

Publication Types