Display options
Share it on

PeerJ. 2016 Jan 18;4:e1591. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1591. eCollection 2016.

The Iflaviruses Sacbrood virus and Deformed wing virus evoke different transcriptional responses in the honeybee which may facilitate their horizontal or vertical transmission.

PeerJ

Eugene V Ryabov, Jessica M Fannon, Jonathan D Moore, Graham R Wood, David J Evans

Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick , Coventry , United Kingdom.
  2. Warwick Systems Biology Centre, University of Warwick , Coventry , United Kingdom.
  3. Biomedical Sciences Research Complex, University of St. Andrews , St. Andrews , United Kingdom.

PMID: 26819848 PMCID: PMC4727977 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1591

Abstract

Sacbrood virus (SBV) and Deformed wing virus (DWV) are evolutionarily related positive-strand RNA viruses, members of the Iflavirus group. They both infect the honeybee Apis mellifera but have strikingly different levels of virulence when transmitted orally. Honeybee larvae orally infected with SBV usually accumulate high levels of the virus, which halts larval development and causes insect death. In contrast, oral DWV infection at the larval stage usually causes asymptomatic infection with low levels of the virus, although high doses of ingested DWV could lead to DWV replicating to high levels. We investigated effects of DWV and SBV infection on the transcriptome of honeybee larvae and pupae using global RNA-Seq and real-time PCR analysis. This showed that high levels of SBV replication resulted in down-regulation of the genes involved in cuticle and muscle development, together with changes in expression of putative immune-related genes. In particular, honeybee larvae with high levels of SBV replication, with and without high levels of DWV replication, showed concerted up-regulated expression of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), and down-regulated expression of the prophenoloxidase activating enzyme (PPAE) together with up-regulation of the expression of a putative serpin, which could lead to the suppression of the melanisation pathway. The effects of high SBV levels on expression of these immune genes were unlikely to be a consequence of SBV-induced developmental changes, because similar effects were observed in honeybee pupae infected by injection. In the orally infected larvae with high levels of DWV replication alone we observed no changes of AMPs or of gene expression in the melanisation pathway. In the injected pupae, high levels of DWV alone did not alter expression of the tested melanisation pathway genes, but resulted in up-regulation of the AMPs, which could be attributed to the effect of DWV on the regulation of AMP expression in response to wounding. We propose that the difference in expression of the honeybee immune genes induced by SBV and DWV may be an evolutionary adaptation to the different predominant transmission routes used by these viruses.

Keywords: Antimicrobial peptide; Apis mellifera; Deformed wing virus; Honeybee; Iflavirus; Innate immunity; RNA virus; RNA-Seq; Sacbrood virus; Transcriptome

References

  1. J Invertebr Pathol. 2010 Jan;103 Suppl 1:S48-61 - PubMed
  2. PLoS Pathog. 2014 Jun 26;10(6):e1004230 - PubMed
  3. J Virol. 2006 May;80(10):4998-5009 - PubMed
  4. Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40 - PubMed
  5. PLoS Pathog. 2012 Dec;8(12):e1003083 - PubMed
  6. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Dec;72(12):7671-7 - PubMed
  7. Science. 2012 Jun 8;336(6086):1304-6 - PubMed
  8. PLoS Pathog. 2011 Jan 13;7(1):e1001252 - PubMed
  9. J Virol Methods. 2014 Mar;197:7-13 - PubMed
  10. Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R106 - PubMed
  11. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2013 May;43(5):474-82 - PubMed
  12. Virology. 1964 Jul;23:425-9 - PubMed
  13. Insect Mol Biol. 2006 Oct;15(5):645-56 - PubMed
  14. Bioinformatics. 2009 Jan 15;25(2):288-9 - PubMed
  15. Biometrics. 1949 Jun;5(2):99-114 - PubMed
  16. J Gen Virol. 2011 Jan;92(Pt 1):156-61 - PubMed
  17. Microbiology. 2002 Jan;148(Pt 1):257-66 - PubMed
  18. Ann Appl Biol. 1969 Jun;63(3):483-91 - PubMed
  19. Science. 2000 Nov 10;290(5494):1166-8 - PubMed
  20. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(11):e1002977 - PubMed
  21. EMBO J. 2002 Jun 3;21(11):2568-79 - PubMed
  22. Insect Mol Biol. 2007 Dec;16(6):753-9 - PubMed
  23. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:697-743 - PubMed
  24. J Gen Virol. 1999 Jun;80 ( Pt 6):1541-9 - PubMed
  25. Virol J. 2013 Jun 27;10:210 - PubMed
  26. J Gen Virol. 2011 Feb;92(Pt 2):370-7 - PubMed
  27. J Virol. 2004 Feb;78(3):1093-100 - PubMed
  28. Virol J. 2006 Mar 28;3:16 - PubMed
  29. Genome Biol. 2009;10(3):R25 - PubMed
  30. J Gen Virol. 2004 Dec;85(Pt 12):3747-55 - PubMed
  31. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(6):e1002735 - PubMed
  32. J Gen Virol. 2005 Dec;86(Pt 12):3419-24 - PubMed
  33. Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9 - PubMed
  34. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2008 Dec;69(4):155-67 - PubMed
  35. J Comp Physiol A. 2001 Sep;187(7):541-7 - PubMed
  36. J Invertebr Pathol. 2012 Jan;109(1):160-4 - PubMed
  37. J Invertebr Pathol. 2010 Jan;103 Suppl 1:S62-72 - PubMed
  38. Curr Opin Immunol. 1998 Feb;10(1):23-8 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support