Display options
Cite
Miles SA, Miranda RA, Ullman MT. Sex Differences in Music: A Female Advantage at Recognizing Familiar Melodies. Front Psychol. 2016;7:278doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00278.
Miles, S. A., Miranda, R. A., & Ullman, M. T. (2016). Sex Differences in Music: A Female Advantage at Recognizing Familiar Melodies. Frontiers in psychology, 7278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00278
Miles, Scott A, et al. "Sex Differences in Music: A Female Advantage at Recognizing Familiar Melodies." Frontiers in psychology vol. 7 (2016): 278. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00278
Miles SA, Miranda RA, Ullman MT. Sex Differences in Music: A Female Advantage at Recognizing Familiar Melodies. Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 01;7:278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00278. eCollection 2016. PMID: 26973574; PMCID: PMC4771742.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 01;7:278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00278. eCollection 2016.

Sex Differences in Music: A Female Advantage at Recognizing Familiar Melodies.

Frontiers in psychology

Scott A Miles, Robbin A Miranda, Michael T Ullman

Affiliations

  1. Brain and Language Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, WashingtonDC, USA; Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, WashingtonDC, USA.
  2. Brain and Language Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, WashingtonDC, USA; Infinimetrics Corporation, ViennaVA, USA.
  3. Brain and Language Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington DC, USA.

PMID: 26973574 PMCID: PMC4771742 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00278

Abstract

Although sex differences have been observed in various cognitive domains, there has been little work examining sex differences in the cognition of music. We tested the prediction that women would be better than men at recognizing familiar melodies, since memories of specific melodies are likely to be learned (at least in part) by declarative memory, which shows female advantages. Participants were 24 men and 24 women, with half musicians and half non-musicians in each group. The two groups were matched on age, education, and various measures of musical training. Participants were presented with well-known and novel melodies, and were asked to indicate their recognition of familiar melodies as rapidly as possible. The women were significantly faster than the men in responding, with a large effect size. The female advantage held across musicians and non-musicians, and across melodies with and without commonly associated lyrics, as evidenced by an absence of interactions between sex and these factors. Additionally, the results did not seem to be explained by sex differences in response biases, or in basic motor processes as tested in a control task. Though caution is warranted given that this is the first study to examine sex differences in familiar melody recognition, the results are consistent with the hypothesis motivating our prediction, namely that declarative memory underlies knowledge about music (particularly about familiar melodies), and that the female advantage at declarative memory may thus lead to female advantages in music cognition (particularly at familiar melody recognition). Additionally, the findings argue against the view that female advantages at tasks involving verbal (or verbalizable) material are due solely to a sex difference specific to the verbal domain. Further, the results may help explain previously reported cognitive commonalities between music and language: since declarative memory also underlies language, such commonalities may be partly due to a common dependence on this memory system. More generally, because declarative memory is well studied at many levels, evidence that music cognition depends on this system may lead to a powerful research program generating a wide range of novel predictions for the neurocognition of music, potentially advancing the field.

Keywords: declarative memory; language; melody; music; music cognition; musical training; recognition; sex differences

References

  1. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(11):1559-67 - PubMed
  2. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;999:15-28 - PubMed
  3. J Neurosci. 1995 Feb;15(2):1080-9 - PubMed
  4. Hippocampus. 2005;15(4):451-9 - PubMed
  5. Am Psychol. 2005 Sep;60(6):581-92 - PubMed
  6. Ageing Res Rev. 2013 Mar;12(2):628-41 - PubMed
  7. Cereb Cortex. 2003 Sep;13(9):943-9 - PubMed
  8. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1992 Oct;17(5):485-95 - PubMed
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 6;108(36):14786-8 - PubMed
  10. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Aug 15;15(6):810-20 - PubMed
  11. Eur J Neurosci. 2006 May;23(10):2791-803 - PubMed
  12. Neuroreport. 2003 Apr 15;14(5):709-13 - PubMed
  13. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:211-31 - PubMed
  14. Mem Cognit. 1997 Jul;25(4):518-33 - PubMed
  15. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan;8(1):49-55 - PubMed
  16. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Jul;11(7):523-32 - PubMed
  17. Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 1;64:134-46 - PubMed
  18. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Oct;11(10):442-50 - PubMed
  19. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Apr;51:205-22 - PubMed
  20. Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jul;6(7):674-81 - PubMed
  21. Neuropsychologia. 2014 Feb;54:1-10 - PubMed
  22. J Neurosci. 2006 Jun 7;26(23):6314-7 - PubMed
  23. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113 - PubMed
  24. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:431-6 - PubMed
  25. Curr Biol. 2011 Dec 20;21(24):2109-14 - PubMed
  26. J Music Ther. 2001 Spring;38(1):28-35 - PubMed
  27. Brain Cogn. 2011 Oct;77(1):40-7 - PubMed
  28. Psychol Bull. 2006 May;132(3):354-80 - PubMed
  29. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jul 1;15(5):683-93 - PubMed
  30. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47 - PubMed
  31. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Oct;27(5):1185-96 - PubMed
  32. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32974 - PubMed
  33. Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92(1-2):231-70 - PubMed
  34. Brain. 1999 Jan;122 ( Pt 1):75-85 - PubMed
  35. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 17;110(38):15443-8 - PubMed
  36. Behav Neurosci. 2000 Dec;114(6):1245-50 - PubMed
  37. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jan;15(1):20-7 - PubMed
  38. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008 Aug;38(7):1395-9 - PubMed
  39. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:259-88 - PubMed
  40. Neuroimage. 2007 Nov 1;38(2):331-45 - PubMed
  41. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 May;137(1):24-35 - PubMed
  42. Epilepsia. 1999 Apr;40(4):414-23 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support