Display options
Share it on

Extrem Physiol Med. 2016 Aug 02;5:9. doi: 10.1186/s13728-016-0050-4. eCollection 2016.

Exercise in space: the European Space Agency approach to in-flight exercise countermeasures for long-duration missions on ISS.

Extreme physiology & medicine

Nora Petersen, Patrick Jaekel, Andre Rosenberger, Tobias Weber, Jonathan Scott, Filippo Castrucci, Gunda Lambrecht, Lori Ploutz-Snyder, Volker Damann, Inessa Kozlovskaya, Joachim Mester

Affiliations

  1. Wyle GmbH, Cologne, Germany ; Space Medicine Office (HSO-AM), European Astronaut Centre Department, Directorate of Human Spaceflight and Operations (D/HSO), European Space Agency (ESA), Geb. 12, Linder Höhe, PO Box 906096, 51147 Cologne, Germany ; Institute of Training Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne (DSHS), Am Sportpark Muengersdorf 6, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
  2. Wyle GmbH, Cologne, Germany ; Space Medicine Office (HSO-AM), European Astronaut Centre Department, Directorate of Human Spaceflight and Operations (D/HSO), European Space Agency (ESA), Geb. 12, Linder Höhe, PO Box 906096, 51147 Cologne, Germany.
  3. Space Medicine Office (HSO-AM), European Astronaut Centre Department, Directorate of Human Spaceflight and Operations (D/HSO), European Space Agency (ESA), Geb. 12, Linder Höhe, PO Box 906096, 51147 Cologne, Germany.
  4. Space Medicine Office (HSO-AM), European Astronaut Centre Department, Directorate of Human Spaceflight and Operations (D/HSO), European Space Agency (ESA), Geb. 12, Linder Höhe, PO Box 906096, 51147 Cologne, Germany ; Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft-und Raumfahrt, Cologne, Germany.
  5. Wyle GmbH, Cologne, Germany.
  6. Universities Space Research Association, NASA Johnson Space Center, B261, SK3, Houston, TX 77058 USA.
  7. Space Medicine Office (HSO-AM), European Astronaut Centre Department, Directorate of Human Spaceflight and Operations (D/HSO), European Space Agency (ESA), Geb. 12, Linder Höhe, PO Box 906096, 51147 Cologne, Germany ; International Space University (ISU), Parc d'Innovation, 1 Rue Jean-Dominique Cassini, 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France.
  8. Institute for Biomedical Problems (IBMP), Russian Space Federation/Roscosmos, Khoroshevskoe Shosse, 76A, 123007 Moscow, Russia.
  9. Institute of Training Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne (DSHS), Am Sportpark Muengersdorf 6, 50933 Cologne, Germany.

PMID: 27489615 PMCID: PMC4971634 DOI: 10.1186/s13728-016-0050-4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To counteract microgravity (µG)-induced adaptation, European Space Agency (ESA) astronauts on long-duration missions (LDMs) to the International Space Station (ISS) perform a daily physical exercise countermeasure program. Since the first ESA crewmember completed an LDM in 2006, the ESA countermeasure program has strived to provide efficient protection against decreases in body mass, muscle strength, bone mass, and aerobic capacity within the operational constraints of the ISS environment and the changing availability of on-board exercise devices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a description of ESA's individualised approach to in-flight exercise countermeasures and an up-to-date picture of how exercise is used to counteract physiological changes resulting from µG-induced adaptation. Changes in the absolute workload for resistive exercise, treadmill running and cycle ergometry throughout ESA's eight LDMs are also presented, and aspects of pre-flight physical preparation and post-flight reconditioning outlined.

RESULTS: With the introduction of the advanced resistive exercise device (ARED) in 2009, the relative contribution of resistance exercise to total in-flight exercise increased (33-46 %), whilst treadmill running (42-33 %) and cycle ergometry (26-20 %) decreased. All eight ESA crewmembers increased their in-flight absolute workload during their LDMs for resistance exercise and treadmill running (running speed and vertical loading through the harness), while cycle ergometer workload was unchanged across missions.

CONCLUSION: Increased or unchanged absolute exercise workloads in-flight would appear contradictory to typical post-flight reductions in muscle mass and strength, and cardiovascular capacity following LDMs. However, increased absolute in-flight workloads are not directly linked to changes in exercise capacity as they likely also reflect the planned, conservative loading early in the mission to allow adaption to µG exercise, including personal comfort issues with novel exercise hardware (e.g. the treadmill harness). Inconsistency in hardware and individualised support concepts across time limit the comparability of results from different crewmembers, and questions regarding the difference between cycling and running in µG versus identical exercise here on Earth, and other factors that might influence in-flight exercise performance, still require further investigation.

Keywords: Astronaut training; European Space Agency; Exercise countermeasures; International Space Station; Microgravity; Physical performance; Space flight

References

  1. Extrem Physiol Med. 2015 Aug 14;4:12 - PubMed
  2. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015 Dec;86(12 Suppl):A24-31 - PubMed
  3. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2011 Jun;82(6):615-21 - PubMed
  4. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Aug 1;117(3):231-8 - PubMed
  5. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009 Apr;106(4):1159-68 - PubMed
  6. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014 Apr;85(4):449-55 - PubMed
  7. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015 Dec;86(12 Suppl):A14-23 - PubMed
  8. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013 Sep;113(9):2171-81 - PubMed
  9. Acta Astronaut. 1995 Oct-Dec;36(8-12):661-8 - PubMed
  10. J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Sep;27(9):1896-906 - PubMed
  11. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015 Dec;86(12 Suppl):A92-3 - PubMed
  12. CMAJ. 2009 Jun 23;180(13):1317-23 - PubMed
  13. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015 Dec;86(12 Suppl):A87-91 - PubMed
  14. J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Dec;29(12):3531-45 - PubMed
  15. J Biomech. 2014 Jul 18;47(10):2339-47 - PubMed
  16. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Aug;89(2):823-39 - PubMed
  17. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015 Dec;86(12 Suppl):A7-13 - PubMed

Publication Types