Display options
Share it on

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016 Jul;3(3):035001. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.3.035001. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

Automatic selection of the active electrode set for image-guided cochlear implant programming.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)

Yiyuan Zhao, Benoit M Dawant, Jack H Noble

Affiliations

  1. Vanderbilt University , Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.

PMID: 27704031 PMCID: PMC5031788 DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.3.035001

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) are neural prostheses that restore hearing by stimulating auditory nerve pathways within the cochlea using an implanted electrode array. Research has shown when multiple electrodes stimulate the same nerve pathways, competing stimulation occurs and hearing outcomes decline. Recent clinical studies have indicated that hearing outcomes can be significantly improved by using an image-guided active electrode set selection technique we have designed, in which electrodes that cause competing stimulation are identified and deactivated. In tests done to date, an expert is needed to perform the electrode selection step with the assistance of a method to visualize the spatial relationship between electrodes and neural sites determined using image analysis techniques. We propose to automate the electrode selection step by optimizing a cost function that captures the heuristics used by the expert. Further, we propose an approach to estimate the values of parameters used in the cost function using an existing database of expert electrode selections. We test this method with different electrode array models from three manufacturers. Our automatic approach generates acceptable active electrode sets in 98.3% of the subjects tested. This approach represents a crucial step toward clinical translation of our image-guided CI programming system.

Keywords: cochlear implant; image-guided cochlear implant programming; stimulation strategy

References

  1. Nature. 1991 Jul 18;352(6332):236-8 - PubMed
  2. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2007 Apr;197:2-24 - PubMed
  3. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Oct;12(5):444-8 - PubMed
  4. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2007 Jun;8(2):220-33 - PubMed
  5. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):2049-57 - PubMed
  6. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Feb;26(2):424-9 - PubMed
  7. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014;17(Pt 1):331-8 - PubMed
  8. Laryngoscope. 2014 Nov;124 Suppl 6:S1-7 - PubMed
  9. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013 Sep;21(5):820-9 - PubMed
  10. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Jun;87(6):2592-605 - PubMed
  11. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2012;15(Pt 2):421-8 - PubMed
  12. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Jan;26(1):34-7 - PubMed
  13. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2005 Mar;6(1):19-27 - PubMed
  14. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2015 Oct;9350:152-159 - PubMed
  15. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Apr;32(3):428-32 - PubMed
  16. Audiol Neurootol. 2014;19(6):400-11 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support