Display options
Share it on

Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2017 Mar;60(2):145-153. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.2.145. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

Association of citalopram with congenital anomalies: A meta-analysis.

Obstetrics & gynecology science

Hyun-Hye Kang, Ki Hoon Ahn, Soon-Cheol Hong, Bo Yong Kwon, Eun Hee Lee, Ji-Sung Lee, Min-Jeong Oh, Hai-Joong Kim

Affiliations

  1. Education and Human Resources Department, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  3. Department of Pediatrics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  4. Clinical Research Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

PMID: 28344955 PMCID: PMC5364096 DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.2.145

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The antenatal use of citalopram, a widely prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, has been suspected to be associated with congenital, particularly cardiac, anomalies. This study aimed to prove the association between citalopram use and congenital anomalies.

METHODS: We searched the English literature from July 1998 to July 2015, by using the search terms ' citalopram', ' pregnancy', ' birth defects', ' congenital anomalies', and ' malformations' in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library.

RESULTS: Eight eligible articles were analyzed including a total of 1,507,896 participants. The odds ratio (OR) of major malformations associated with citalopram use during pregnancy was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 to 1.17). Concerning cardiac malformations, the OR for all included studies was 1.31 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.93). The analysis of cardiac malformations was repeated to reduce heterogeneity after excluding one outlier study (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.26).

CONCLUSION: From our data, it can be concluded that citalopram use is not associated with major birth defects. However, physicians should carefully weigh the benefits against the potential risks of citalopram use, and counsel patients accordingly.

Keywords: Citalopram; Congenital anomalies; Heart defects; Meta-analysis; Pregnancy

References

  1. Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4 Pt 1):880-7 - PubMed
  2. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1993 Jan;187(1):75-85 - PubMed
  3. Teratology. 1993 Jun;47(6):573-84 - PubMed
  4. Can J Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;49(11):726-35 - PubMed
  5. Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373(9665):746-58 - PubMed
  6. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2003 Dec;21(8):417-24 - PubMed
  7. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):111-20 - PubMed
  8. Pharmacol Ther. 2000 Jan;85(1):11-28 - PubMed
  9. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;47(11):1002-12 - PubMed
  10. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001 Nov;16(6):357-61 - PubMed
  11. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 28;356(26):2684-92 - PubMed
  12. Daru. 2012 Nov 01;20(1):75 - PubMed
  13. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2007 Apr;79(4):301-8 - PubMed
  14. JAMA. 2006 Feb 1;295(5):499-507 - PubMed
  15. BMJ. 2009 Sep 23;339:b3569 - PubMed
  16. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011 Mar;91(3):142-52 - PubMed
  17. Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug 09;2:29-36 - PubMed
  18. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002 May;17(3):103-7 - PubMed
  19. Drugs. 1991 Mar;41(3):450-77 - PubMed
  20. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 May;19(3):143-8 - PubMed
  21. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2008 Feb;83(1):68-76 - PubMed
  22. Psychol Med. 2010 Oct;40(10):1723-33 - PubMed
  23. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Feb;198(2):194.e1-5 - PubMed
  24. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Aug;72(2):184-91 - PubMed

Publication Types