Display options
Share it on

Phys Rev Lett. 2017 Jun 09;118(23):231801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.231801. Epub 2017 Jun 05.

Constraints on Oscillation Parameters from ν_{e} Appearance and ν_{μ} Disappearance in NOvA.

Physical review letters

P Adamson, L Aliaga, D Ambrose, N Anfimov, A Antoshkin, E Arrieta-Diaz, K Augsten, A Aurisano, C Backhouse, M Baird, B A Bambah, K Bays, B Behera, S Bending, R Bernstein, V Bhatnagar, B Bhuyan, J Bian, T Blackburn, A Bolshakova, C Bromberg, J Brown, G Brunetti, N Buchanan, A Butkevich, V Bychkov, M Campbell, E Catano-Mur, S Childress, B C Choudhary, B Chowdhury, T E Coan, J A B Coelho, M Colo, J Cooper, L Corwin, L Cremonesi, D Cronin-Hennessy, G S Davies, J P Davies, P F Derwent, R Dharmapalan, P Ding, Z Djurcic, E C Dukes, H Duyang, S Edayath, R Ehrlich, G J Feldman, M J Frank, M Gabrielyan, H R Gallagher, S Germani, T Ghosh, A Giri, R A Gomes, M C Goodman, V Grichine, R Group, D Grover, B Guo, A Habig, J Hartnell, R Hatcher, A Hatzikoutelis, K Heller, A Himmel, A Holin, J Hylen, F Jediny, M Judah, G K Kafka, D Kalra, S M S Kasahara, S Kasetti, R Keloth, L Kolupaeva, S Kotelnikov, I Kourbanis, A Kreymer, A Kumar, S Kurbanov, K Lang, W M Lee, S Lin, J Liu, M Lokajicek, J Lozier, S Luchuk, K Maan, S Magill, W A Mann, M L Marshak, K Matera, V Matveev, D P Méndez, M D Messier, H Meyer, T Miao, W H Miller, S R Mishra, R Mohanta, A Moren, L Mualem, M Muether, S Mufson, R Murphy, J Musser, J K Nelson, R Nichol, E Niner, A Norman, T Nosek, Y Oksuzian, A Olshevskiy, T Olson, J Paley, P Pandey, R B Patterson, G Pawloski, D Pershey, O Petrova, R Petti, S Phan-Budd, R K Plunkett, R Poling, B Potukuchi, C Principato, F Psihas, A Radovic, R A Rameika, B Rebel, B Reed, D Rocco, P Rojas, V Ryabov, K Sachdev, P Sail, O Samoylov, M C Sanchez, R Schroeter, J Sepulveda-Quiroz, P Shanahan, A Sheshukov, J Singh, J Singh, P Singh, V Singh, J Smolik, N Solomey, E Song, A Sousa, K Soustruznik, M Strait, L Suter, R L Talaga, M C Tamsett, P Tas, R B Thayyullathil, J Thomas, X Tian, S C Tognini, J Tripathi, A Tsaris, J Urheim, P Vahle, J Vasel, L Vinton, A Vold, T Vrba, B Wang, M Wetstein, D Whittington, S G Wojcicki, J Wolcott, N Yadav, S Yang, J Zalesak, B Zamorano, R Zwaska,

Affiliations

  1. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA.
  2. School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
  3. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow region 141980, Russia.
  4. Department of Physics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275, USA.
  5. Czech Technical University in Prague, Brehova 7, 115 19 Prague 1, Czech Republic.
  6. Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA.
  7. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
  8. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
  9. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom.
  10. School of Physics, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad 500 046, India.
  11. Department of Physics, IIT Hyderabad, Hyderabad 502 205, India.
  12. Physics and Astronomy Department, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
  13. Department of Physics, Panjab University, Chandigarh 106 014, India.
  14. Department of Physics, IIT Guwahati, Guwahati 781 039, India.
  15. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, USA.
  16. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
  17. Department of Physics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1875, USA.
  18. Institute for Nuclear Research of Russia, Academy of Sciences 7a, 60th October Anniversary prospect, Moscow 117312, Russia.
  19. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA.
  20. Department of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India.
  21. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA.
  22. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA.
  23. Department of Physics, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA.
  24. South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701, USA.
  25. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA.
  26. Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, USA.
  27. Department of Physics, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi 682 022, India.
  28. Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
  29. Department of Physics, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama 36688, USA.
  30. Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás 74690-900, Brazil.
  31. Nuclear Physics Department, Lebedev Physical Institute, Leninsky Prospect 53, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
  32. Department of Physics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India.
  33. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota 55812, USA.
  34. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA.
  35. Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.
  36. Institute of Physics, The Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 21 Prague, Czech Republic.
  37. Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Physics, Wichita State University, Wichita, Kansas 67206, USA.
  38. Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics, 116 36 Prague, Czech Republic.
  39. Department of Physics, Winona State University, P.O. Box 5838, Winona, Minnesota 55987, USA.
  40. Department of Physics and Electronics, University of Jammu, Jammu Tawi 180 006, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
  41. Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.

PMID: 28644674 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.231801

Abstract

Results are reported from an improved measurement of ν_{μ}→ν_{e} transitions by the NOvA experiment. Using an exposure equivalent to 6.05×10^{20} protons on target, 33 ν_{e} candidates are observed with a background of 8.2±0.8 (syst.). Combined with the latest NOvA ν_{μ} disappearance data and external constraints from reactor experiments on sin^{2}2θ_{13}, the hypothesis of inverted mass hierarchy with θ_{23} in the lower octant is disfavored at greater than 93% C.L. for all values of δ_{CP}.

Publication Types