Display options
Share it on

Environ Res Lett. 2011 Oct-Dec;6(4). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044015. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

Mercury interferes with endogenous antioxidant levels in Yukon River subsistence-fed sled dogs.

Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site]

Kriya L Dunlap, Arleigh J Reynolds, S Craig Gerlach, Lawrence K Duffy

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Box 756160, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA.
  2. Cross-Cultural Studies, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Box 756730, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA.

PMID: 28781607 PMCID: PMC5543993 DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044015

Abstract

Before adopting modern corn-and-grain-based western processed diets, circumpolar people had a high fat and protein subsistence diet and exhibited a low incidence of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Some health benefits are attributable to a subsistence diet that is rich in omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants. Pollution, both global and local, is a threat to wild foods, as it introduces contaminants into the food system. Northern indigenous people and their sled dogs are exposed to a variety of contaminants, including mercury, that accumulate in the fish and game that they consume. The sled dogs in Alaskan villages are maintained on the same subsistence foods as their human counterparts, primarily salmon, and therefore they can be used as a food systems model for researching the impact of changes in dietary components. In this study, the antioxidant status and mercury levels were measured for village sled dogs along the Yukon River. A reference kennel, maintained on a nutritionally balanced commercial diet, was also measured for comparison. Total antioxidant status was inversely correlated with the external stressor mercury.

Keywords: Yukon River; antioxidant status; mercury; salmon; sled dogs; subsistence food

References

  1. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2003 Sep;62(3):228-41 - PubMed
  2. Mar Pollut Bull. 2001 Oct;42(10):993-7 - PubMed
  3. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2006 Apr;143(4):429-34 - PubMed
  4. JAMA. 2006 Oct 18;296(15):1885-99 - PubMed
  5. Int J Circumpolar Health. 1998;57 Suppl 1:561-6 - PubMed
  6. Neurobiol Aging. 2002 Sep-Oct;23(5):737-45 - PubMed
  7. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Nov;84(5):981-8 - PubMed
  8. Sci Total Environ. 2007 Oct 15;385(1-3):80-5 - PubMed
  9. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1995 Sep;77(3):189-95 - PubMed
  10. Sci Total Environ. 2006 Jun 1;362(1-3):103-23 - PubMed
  11. Diabetes Care. 1994 Dec;17(12):1498-501 - PubMed
  12. Lancet. 1971 Jun 5;1(7710):1143-5 - PubMed
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 6;98(23):13144-8 - PubMed
  14. BMC Biol. 2006 Apr 18;4:10 - PubMed
  15. Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Aug 1;156(3):274-85 - PubMed
  16. Metabolism. 2006 Aug;55(8):989-95 - PubMed
  17. Am J Clin Nutr. 1975 Sep;28(9):958-66 - PubMed
  18. Am J Vet Res. 1999 Jul;60(7):789-95 - PubMed
  19. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2001 Sep 28;82(1-2):57-71 - PubMed
  20. Science. 1987 Aug 21;237(4817):885-8 - PubMed
  21. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011 Jul;65(7):864-71 - PubMed
  22. Sci Total Environ. 2010 Sep 15;408(20):4532-41 - PubMed
  23. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Aug;118(8):1165-72 - PubMed
  24. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2006 Jun;65(3):243-52 - PubMed
  25. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A. 1993 Nov-Dec;40(9-10):720-30 - PubMed
  26. Alaska Med. 2006 Jul-Sep;48(2):30-59 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support