Display options
Cite
Tan Z, Yang T, Wang Y, et al. Metagenomic Analysis of Cecal Microbiome Identified Microbiota and Functional Capacities Associated with Feed Efficiency in Landrace Finishing Pigs. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1546doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01546.
Tan, Z., Yang, T., Wang, Y., Xing, K., Zhang, F., Zhao, X., Ao, H., Chen, S., Liu, J., & Wang, C. (2017). Metagenomic Analysis of Cecal Microbiome Identified Microbiota and Functional Capacities Associated with Feed Efficiency in Landrace Finishing Pigs. Frontiers in microbiology, 81546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01546
Tan, Zhen, et al. "Metagenomic Analysis of Cecal Microbiome Identified Microbiota and Functional Capacities Associated with Feed Efficiency in Landrace Finishing Pigs." Frontiers in microbiology vol. 8 (2017): 1546. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01546
Tan Z, Yang T, Wang Y, Xing K, Zhang F, Zhao X, Ao H, Chen S, Liu J, Wang C. Metagenomic Analysis of Cecal Microbiome Identified Microbiota and Functional Capacities Associated with Feed Efficiency in Landrace Finishing Pigs. Front Microbiol. 2017 Aug 11;8:1546. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01546. eCollection 2017. PMID: 28848539; PMCID: PMC5554500.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Microbiol. 2017 Aug 11;8:1546. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01546. eCollection 2017.

Metagenomic Analysis of Cecal Microbiome Identified Microbiota and Functional Capacities Associated with Feed Efficiency in Landrace Finishing Pigs.

Frontiers in microbiology

Zhen Tan, Ting Yang, Yuan Wang, Kai Xing, Fengxia Zhang, Xitong Zhao, Hong Ao, Shaokang Chen, Jianfeng Liu, Chuduan Wang

Affiliations

  1. National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, MOA Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural UniversityBeijing, China.
  2. The State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijing, China.
  3. Beijing General Station of Animal HusbandryBeijing, China.

PMID: 28848539 PMCID: PMC5554500 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01546

Abstract

Feed efficiency (FE) appears to vary even within closely related pigs, and may be partly affected by the diversity in the composition and function of gut microbes. To investigate the components and functional differences of gut microbiota of low and high FE pigs, high throughput sequencing and

Keywords: cecal microbiome; feed conversion ratio; feed efficiency; metagenomics; pigs

References

  1. J Biochem. 1998 Nov;124(5):905-10 - PubMed
  2. Arch Microbiol. 2015 Aug;197(6):753-9 - PubMed
  3. Genome Biol. 2011 Jun 24;12(6):R60 - PubMed
  4. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56612 - PubMed
  5. ISME J. 2016 Dec;10 (12 ):2973-2977 - PubMed
  6. J Appl Genet. 2014 Feb;55(1):145-54 - PubMed
  7. Science. 2012 Jun 8;336(6086):1262-7 - PubMed
  8. Nat Microbiol. 2016 Sep 19;:16161 - PubMed
  9. Cell Host Microbe. 2008 Apr 17;3(4):213-23 - PubMed
  10. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008 Jun;72(2):317-64, table of contents - PubMed
  11. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016 Oct;66(10 ):4125-4131 - PubMed
  12. ISME J. 2014 Aug;8(8):1566-76 - PubMed
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 1;113(9):E1306-15 - PubMed
  14. Mol Biol Rep. 2012 Dec;39(12):10595-602 - PubMed
  15. Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 03;6:27427 - PubMed
  16. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002 Sep;52(Pt 5):1615-20 - PubMed
  17. Science. 2013 Sep 6;341(6150):1241214 - PubMed
  18. Nature. 2006 Dec 21;444(7122):1027-31 - PubMed
  19. Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 1;22(13):1658-9 - PubMed
  20. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 21;6:23219 - PubMed
  21. Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Jun 29;42:25 - PubMed
  22. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D277-80 - PubMed
  23. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D490-5 - PubMed
  24. Nature. 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):242-9 - PubMed
  25. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(19):5623-30 - PubMed
  26. Nature. 2014 Sep 4;513(7516):59-64 - PubMed
  27. Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 07;5:11953 - PubMed
  28. Nature. 2010 Mar 4;464(7285):59-65 - PubMed
  29. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D443-7 - PubMed
  30. Genome Biol Evol. 2014 Mar;6(3):703-13 - PubMed
  31. Gene. 2014 Jan 1;533(1):5-10 - PubMed
  32. Cell. 2006 Feb 24;124(4):837-48 - PubMed
  33. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015 Dec;36:137-45 - PubMed
  34. Pol J Microbiol. 2015;64(2):107-14 - PubMed
  35. Gene. 2014 Jul 15;545(1):88-94 - PubMed
  36. Bioinformatics. 2008 Mar 1;24(5):713-4 - PubMed
  37. BMC Microbiol. 2011 May 15;11:103 - PubMed
  38. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2014 Jun;27(6):898-906 - PubMed
  39. Vet Microbiol. 2015 Jun 12;177(3-4):242-51 - PubMed
  40. Anaerobe. 2013 Apr;20:65-73 - PubMed
  41. Sci Rep. 2016 May 31;6:26621 - PubMed
  42. J Anim Sci. 2013 Sep;91(9):4069-79 - PubMed
  43. Poult Sci. 2010 Aug;89(8):1614-21 - PubMed
  44. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 31;109(5):1691-6 - PubMed
  45. Genome Res. 2010 Feb;20(2):265-72 - PubMed

Publication Types