Display options
Share it on

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 08;14(10). doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101193.

From Delivery to Adoption of Physical Activity Guidelines: Realist Synthesis.

International journal of environmental research and public health

Liliana Leone, Caterina Pesce

Affiliations

  1. CEVAS Center for Research and Evaluation, 00175 Rome, Italy. [email protected].
  2. Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", 00135 Rome, Italy. [email protected].

PMID: 28991184 PMCID: PMC5664694 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14101193

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidelines published by health authorities for the promotion of health-enhancing physical activity (PA), continue to be implemented unsuccessfully and demonstrate a gap between evidence and policies. This review synthesizes evidence on factors influencing delivery, adoption and implementation of PA promotion guidelines within different policy sectors (e.g., health, transport, urban planning, sport, education).

METHODS: Published literature was initially searched using PubMed, EBSCO, Google Scholar and continued through an iterative snowball technique. The literature review spanned the period 2002-2017. The realist synthesis approach was adopted to review the content of 39 included studies. An initial programme theory with a four-step chain from evidence emersion to implementation of guidelines was tested.

RESULTS: The synthesis furthers our understanding of the link between PA guidelines delivery and the actions of professionals responsible for implementation within health services, school departments and municipalities. The main mechanisms identified for guidance implementation were scientific legitimation, enforcement, feasibility, familiarity with concepts and PA habits. Threats emerged to the successful implementation of PA guidelines at national/local jurisdictional levels.

CONCLUSIONS: The way PA guidelines are developed may influence their adoption by policy-makers and professionals. Useful lessons emerged that may inform synergies between policymaking and professional practices, promoting win-win multisectoral strategies.

Keywords: active living; guidance implementation; health; knowledge translation; multisectoral policy; organisational change; realist review; urban planning

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 08;8:107 - PubMed
  2. BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 14;17 (1):655 - PubMed
  3. BMC Public Health. 2013 May 01;13:419 - PubMed
  4. BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 9;16(1):1145 - PubMed
  5. Health Place. 2012 Jan;18(1):100-5 - PubMed
  6. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Oct;59(10):886-92 - PubMed
  7. Obes Rev. 2011 May;12(5):e324-37 - PubMed
  8. BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 07;3(1):null - PubMed
  9. J Sch Health. 2010 Jul;80(7):326-32 - PubMed
  10. Health Promot Int. 2012 Jun;27(2):261-74 - PubMed
  11. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 May;68(5):498-509 - PubMed
  12. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;45(3):158 - PubMed
  13. Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 07;5:54 - PubMed
  14. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jul;41(7):1510-30 - PubMed
  15. Health Place. 2015 May;33:75-82 - PubMed
  16. Diabetes Metab. 2012 Jun;38(3):243-9 - PubMed
  17. Implement Sci. 2011 Dec 15;6:128 - PubMed
  18. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jun 30;13(7):null - PubMed
  19. J Sports Sci. 2010 Apr;28(6):573-91 - PubMed
  20. Promot Educ. 2006;13(2):118-26 - PubMed
  21. BMJ Open. 2014 Aug 06;4(8):e005439 - PubMed
  22. Arch Dis Child. 2011 Oct;96(10):942-7 - PubMed
  23. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2014 Dec;79(4):149-52 - PubMed
  24. Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 19;7:33 - PubMed
  25. Health Promot Int. 2007 Jun;22(2):112-21 - PubMed
  26. Circulation. 2012 Feb 7;125(5):729-37 - PubMed
  27. Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5):452-9 - PubMed
  28. Int J Behav Med. 2015 Feb;22(1):32-50 - PubMed
  29. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413-33 - PubMed
  30. J R Soc Med. 2011 Dec;104(12):501-9 - PubMed
  31. J Phys Act Health. 2010 Mar;7 Suppl 1:S13-9 - PubMed
  32. Health Care Manage Rev. 2012 Jan-Mar;37(1):67-76 - PubMed
  33. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Apr 18;10:14 - PubMed
  34. J Urban Health. 2012 Dec;89(6):875-80 - PubMed
  35. BMC Med. 2013 Jan 29;11:21 - PubMed
  36. J Public Health Policy. 2009 Apr;30(1):102-16 - PubMed
  37. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2009 Apr;33(2):189-92 - PubMed
  38. BMJ. 2004 Oct 30;329(7473):1013 - PubMed
  39. Am J Public Health. 2007 Oct;97(10):1900-7 - PubMed
  40. J Sch Health. 2012 May;82(5):201-9 - PubMed
  41. Nurs Stand. 2002 May 29-Jun 4;16(37):38-43 - PubMed
  42. Am J Prev Med. 2002 Aug;23(2 Suppl):5-14 - PubMed
  43. BMJ. 2010 May 20;340:c2202 - PubMed
  44. J Phys Act Health. 2012 Nov;9(8):1053-5 - PubMed
  45. Int J Behav Med. 2015 Jun;22(3):404-14 - PubMed
  46. Implement Sci. 2007 Mar 26;2:8 - PubMed
  47. J Phys Act Health. 2010 Mar;7 Suppl 1:S108-19 - PubMed
  48. J Phys Act Health. 2009 Nov;6(6):805-17 - PubMed
  49. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Sep;62(9):835-41 - PubMed
  50. Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Jun 29;4(3):null - PubMed
  51. J Public Health Policy. 2010 Jul;31(2):164-77 - PubMed
  52. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jan;56(1):48-55 - PubMed
  53. Health Place. 2012 Jan;18(1):5-7 - PubMed
  54. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21 Suppl 2:S14-20 - PubMed
  55. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 May;17(2):289-99 - PubMed
  56. J Phys Act Health. 2011 Jan;8 Suppl 1:S116-24 - PubMed
  57. Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):258-71 - PubMed
  58. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Nov;46(14 ):1024-6 - PubMed
  59. Implement Sci. 2008 Jul 16;3:36 - PubMed
  60. Implement Sci. 2010 Feb 09;5:14 - PubMed
  61. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Jul 14;12:34 - PubMed
  62. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jun;48(6):1197-222 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types