Display options
Share it on

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Sep 13;5(9):e1472. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001472. eCollection 2017 Sep.

Validation of a Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation Scale for Surgeons and Laypersons.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open

Alex Campbell, Carolina Restrepo, Gaurav Deshpande, Caroline Tredway, Sarah M Bernstein, Rachel Patzer, Lisa Wendby, Bjorn Schonmeyr

Affiliations

  1. Operation Smile, Virginia Beach, Va.; Plastic Surgery, Penn State Hershey, Hershey, Pa.; MGM Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, India; School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.; Department of Epidemiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.; Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.; and Plastic Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden.

PMID: 29062644 PMCID: PMC5640349 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001472

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A standardized evaluation tool is needed for the assessment of surgical outcomes in cleft lip surgery. Current scales for evaluating unilateral cleft lip/nose (UCL/N) aesthetic outcomes are limited in their reliability, ease of use, and application. The Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation (UCL SOE) scale measures symmetry of 4 components and sums these for a total score. The purpose of this study was to validate the SOE as a reliable tool for use by both surgeons and laypersons.

METHODS: Twenty participants (9 surgeons and 12 laypeople) used the SOE to evaluate 25 sets of randomly selected presurgical and postsurgical standardized photographs of UCL/N patients. Interrater reliability for surgeon and laypeople was determined using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS: Individual surgeons and laypeople both reached an ICC in the "fair to good" range (ICC = 0.42 and 0.59, respectively). Averaging 2 evaluators in the surgeon group improved the ICC to 0.58 and in the laypeople group to 0.74, respectively. Averaging 3 evaluators increased the ICC for surgeons to the "good" range (ICC = 0.71) and the ICC for laypeople to the "very good" range (ICC = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon and layperson raters can reliably use the SOE to assess the aesthetics results after surgical repair of UCL/N, and improved reliability and reproducibility is achieved by averaging the scores of multiple reviewers.

References

  1. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992 Sep;29(5):409-12 - PubMed
  2. Br J Plast Surg. 1993 Jan;46(1):7-12 - PubMed
  3. Cleft Palate J. 1987 Oct;24(4):314-22 - PubMed
  4. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009 Mar;46(2):197-203 - PubMed
  5. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012 Mar;11(1):38-46 - PubMed
  6. Br J Orthod. 1998 Feb;25(1):21-30 - PubMed
  7. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997 May;34(3):242-6 - PubMed
  8. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999 Jul;36(4):328-33 - PubMed
  9. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Feb;64(2):195-200 - PubMed
  10. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov;128(5):518e-526e - PubMed
  11. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1999;14(1):65-75 - PubMed
  12. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Oct;138(4):864-74 - PubMed
  13. World J Surg. 2010 Mar;34(3):403-10 - PubMed
  14. Clin Plast Surg. 2014 Apr;41(2):311-9 - PubMed
  15. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1992;26(3):313-9 - PubMed
  16. Plast Surg Int. 2013;2013:671786 - PubMed
  17. Eur J Orthod. 2003 Jun;25(3):243-9 - PubMed
  18. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Nov;62(11):1437-41 - PubMed
  19. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992 Sep;29(5):393-7 - PubMed
  20. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 May;48(3):239-43 - PubMed
  21. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991 Oct;28(4):419-24 - PubMed
  22. J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Sep;21(5):1519-24 - PubMed
  23. Br J Orthod. 1991 May;18(2):152-3 - PubMed
  24. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Mar;42(2):145-56 - PubMed
  25. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991 Oct;28(4):385-90; discussion 390-1 - PubMed
  26. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 Mar;33(2):134-42 - PubMed
  27. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007 Nov;44(6):598-606 - PubMed
  28. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998 Sep;32(3):301-6 - PubMed
  29. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 May;48(3):259-64 - PubMed
  30. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 May;133(5):1276-88 - PubMed
  31. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991 Apr;28(2):190-3; 193-4 discussion - PubMed

Publication Types