Display options
Cite
Edge CE, Cooper AM, Coffey M. Barriers and facilitators to extended working lives in Europe: a gender focus. Public Health Rev. 2017;38:2doi: 10.1186/s40985-017-0053-8.
Edge, C. E., Cooper, A. M., & Coffey, M. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to extended working lives in Europe: a gender focus. Public health reviews, 382. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0053-8
Edge, Clare Ellen, et al. "Barriers and facilitators to extended working lives in Europe: a gender focus." Public health reviews vol. 38 (2017): 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0053-8
Edge CE, Cooper AM, Coffey M. Barriers and facilitators to extended working lives in Europe: a gender focus. Public Health Rev. 2017 Jan 31;38:2. doi: 10.1186/s40985-017-0053-8. eCollection 2017. PMID: 29450074; PMCID: PMC5810036.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Public Health Rev. 2017 Jan 31;38:2. doi: 10.1186/s40985-017-0053-8. eCollection 2017.

Barriers and facilitators to extended working lives in Europe: a gender focus.

Public health reviews

Clare Ellen Edge, Anna Mary Cooper, Margaret Coffey

Affiliations

  1. 1University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
  2. Department of Psychology and Public Health, School of Health Sciences, Allerton Building, Frederick Road, Salford, Manchester M6 6PU UK.

PMID: 29450074 PMCID: PMC5810036 DOI: 10.1186/s40985-017-0053-8

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a global imperative to respond to the challenge of a growing 'old-age dependency ratio' by ensuring the workforce is healthy enough to remain in work for longer. Currently more than half of older workers leave before the default retirement age, and in some countries (e.g. the UK), the time spent in retirement is increasing. At the same time across Europe, there is a gender employment gap, with 14.5% fewer female workers between 55-64 years old, and a large variation in the participation of older women in the workforce (ranging from 30-75%). As older women are under-represented in the workforce, increasing employment in this group has the propensity to go some way towards reducing the old-age dependency ratio to ensure continued economic growth.

OBJECTIVES: This review explores the barriers and facilitators to extended working lives in Europe, particularly those that impact on women.

METHODS: A systematic mapping review process was undertaken using four electronic databases, MEDLINE, PsychoINFO, PsychEXTRA via Ovid and AgeLine via EBSCO, using the terms, 'work', 'ageing', 'retirement', 'pension', 'old', 'barrier', 'extended working life', 'gender' and 'health and well-being'. Hand searching was also carried out in the

RESULTS: The search resulted in 15 English language studies published from 1st January 2005 to the current date that met the inclusion criteria.

KEY FINDINGS: The key factors that influenced decisions to retire or extend working lives in Europe were health, social factors, workplace factors, and financial security and pension arrangements.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE KEY FINDINGS: Health was found to be the most commonly cited barrier to extended working lives in Europe, and a number of social inequalities to work exist by gender. Structural factors exist, such as the gender pay gap, which disadvantages women, while the nature of work itself differs by gender and can have a negative impact on health. Currently, women tend to exit the labour market earlier than men; however, changes in the state pension age are resulting in women being required to work for as long as men, in most countries. For women to remain healthy at work, workplaces need to consider a range of interventions, including flexible arrangements to both work and retirement to enable women to balance the demands of work with domestic and caring responsibilities that particularly impact on them.

Keywords: Age; Barriers; Extended working lives; Facilitators; Older workers; Women

References

  1. J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Jun;23(2):200-8 - PubMed
  2. Health Econ. 2012 Mar;21(3):282-300 - PubMed
  3. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2010;71(3):231-58 - PubMed
  4. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015 Jul;88(5):521-32 - PubMed
  5. Am Psychol. 2006 Apr;61(3):192-203 - PubMed
  6. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012 May;85(4):437-45 - PubMed
  7. Occup Environ Med. 2008 Apr;65(4):283-5 - PubMed
  8. Genus. 2016;72 (1):9 - PubMed
  9. Demography. 2015 Apr;52(2):433-54 - PubMed
  10. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Jul 28;13:85 - PubMed
  11. BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 13;13:1180 - PubMed
  12. Gerontologist. 2015 Apr;55(2):262-70 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Public Health. 2012 Jun;22(3):299-300 - PubMed
  14. Occup Med (Lond). 2010 May;60(3):193-204 - PubMed
  15. J Aging Stud. 2013 Dec;27(4):299-307 - PubMed
  16. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2012;75(3):239-71 - PubMed
  17. BMC Public Health. 2013 May 28;13:516 - PubMed
  18. Age Ageing. 2011 Jan;40(1):54-61 - PubMed

Publication Types