Beilstein J Org Chem. 2018 Feb 20;14:470-483. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.14.33. eCollection 2018.
Latest development in the synthesis of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA): a critical review.
Beilstein journal of organic chemistry
Fabio Tonin, Isabel W C E Arends
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ Delft, The Netherlands.
PMID: 29520309
PMCID: PMC5827811 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.14.33
Abstract
Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a pharmaceutical ingredient widely used in clinics. As bile acid it solubilizes cholesterol gallstones and improves the liver function in case of cholestatic diseases. UDCA can be obtained from cholic acid (CA), which is the most abundant and least expensive bile acid available. The now available chemical routes for the obtainment of UDCA yield about 30% of final product. For these syntheses several protection and deprotection steps requiring toxic and dangerous reagents have to be performed, leading to the production of a series of waste products. In many cases the cholic acid itself first needs to be prepared from its taurinated and glycilated derivatives in the bile, thus adding to the complexity and multitude of steps involved of the synthetic process. For these reasons, several studies have been performed towards the development of microbial transformations or chemoenzymatic procedures for the synthesis of UDCA starting from CA or chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA). This promising approach led several research groups to focus their attention on the development of biotransformations with non-pathogenic, easy-to-manage microorganisms, and their enzymes. In particular, the enzymatic reactions involved are selective hydrolysis, epimerization of the hydroxy functions (by oxidation and subsequent reduction) and the specific hydroxylation and dehydroxylation of suitable positions in the steroid rings. In this minireview, we critically analyze the state of the art of the production of UDCA by several chemical, chemoenzymatic and enzymatic routes reported, highlighting the bottlenecks of each production step. Particular attention is placed on the precursors availability as well as the substrate loading in the process. Potential new routes and recent developments are discussed, in particular on the employment of flow-reactors. The latter technology allows to develop processes with shorter reaction times and lower costs for the chemical and enzymatic reactions involved.
Keywords: UDCA; bile acids; biotransformation; hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases; production process
References
- Hepatology. 1984 Sep-Oct;4(5 Suppl):66S-71S - PubMed
- Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Nov 19;450(2):142-53 - PubMed
- Gastroenterology. 1989 Jan;96(1):222-9 - PubMed
- J Lipid Res. 1987 Jul;28(7):755-9 - PubMed
- Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Apr;90(1):127-35 - PubMed
- Drugs. 1981 Feb;21(2):90-119 - PubMed
- J Lipid Res. 1984 Oct;25(10):1084-9 - PubMed
- J Lipid Res. 1982 Nov;23(8):1152-8 - PubMed
- Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Sep;95(5):1221-33 - PubMed
- J Lipid Res. 1980 Jan;21(1):72-90 - PubMed
- Steroids. 2011 Nov;76(12):1397-9 - PubMed
- Semin Liver Dis. 1983 May;3(2):146-56 - PubMed
- Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006 Apr 20;93(6):1216-20 - PubMed
- Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 May;37(5):992-1000 - PubMed
- Hepatol Res. 2008;38(2):123-31 - PubMed
- Steroids. 1997 Aug-Sep;62(8-9):564-77 - PubMed
- Gastroenterol Jpn. 1980;15(3):257-63 - PubMed
- Eur J Biochem. 1991 Mar 14;196(2):439-50 - PubMed
- Curr Microbiol. 2003 Dec;47(6):475-84 - PubMed
- Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Mar;66(3):1107-13 - PubMed
- Steroids. 2008 Dec 22;73(14):1385-90 - PubMed
- Prep Biochem. 1982;12(4):307-21 - PubMed
- Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2013 Apr;17(2):236-49 - PubMed
- Drugs. 1984 Feb;27(2):95-131 - PubMed
- J Bacteriol. 1994 Aug;176(16):4865-74 - PubMed
- J Biol Chem. 1998 Nov 20;273(47):30888-96 - PubMed
- Biochim Biophys Acta. 1978 Jan 27;528(1):148-57 - PubMed
- J Pediatr. 1990 Sep;117(3):482-9 - PubMed
- Gastroenterology. 1980 Jun;78(6):1412-8 - PubMed
- Steroids. 2016 Mar;107:20-9 - PubMed
- J Biol Chem. 1952 Apr;195(2):763-78 - PubMed
- Dig Dis Sci. 1996 Apr;41(4):809-15 - PubMed
- Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Nov;44(5):1187-95 - PubMed
- J Steroid Biochem. 1984 Oct;21(4):413-20 - PubMed
- Steroids. 1997 Apr;62(4):332-45 - PubMed
- Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013 Jan;110(1):68-77 - PubMed
- Arch Intern Med. 1972 Oct;130(4):506-27 - PubMed
- Enzyme Microb Technol. 2017 Apr;99:16-24 - PubMed
- Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003 Jan;60(5):495-506 - PubMed
- J Bacteriol. 1991 Aug;173(15):4558-69 - PubMed
- Hepatology. 1996 Jun;23(6):1484-90 - PubMed
- J Biotechnol. 2014 Dec 10;191:11-21 - PubMed
- J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2009 Jan 12;5:2 - PubMed
- Gut Microbes. 2016;7(1):22-39 - PubMed
- Arch Intern Med. 1999 Dec 13-27;159(22):2647-58 - PubMed
- Chem Rev. 2011 Jul 13;111(7):4111-40 - PubMed
- Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013 Jan;97(2):633-9 - PubMed
- J Bacteriol. 1991 Apr;173(7):2173-9 - PubMed
- Hepatology. 1992 Oct;16(4):924-30 - PubMed
- Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1967;71(4):629-38 - PubMed
- J Steroid Biochem. 1982 Sep;17(3):295-303 - PubMed
- Hepatology. 1982 Nov-Dec;2(6):804-10 - PubMed
- J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Feb 15;65(6):1178-1185 - PubMed
- Microbiol Res. 2014 Feb-Mar;169(2-3):148-54 - PubMed
- Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Dec;58(12):3792-8 - PubMed
- Nature. 2015 Nov 19;527(7578):394-7 - PubMed
- Steroids. 2002 Jan;67(1):51-6 - PubMed
- Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Sep;95(6):1457-68 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 1975 Dec 11;293(24):1255-7 - PubMed
- J Lipid Res. 1981 Nov;22(8):1225-34 - PubMed
- Steroids. 2013 Mar;78(3):370-8 - PubMed
- Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D733-45 - PubMed
- J Lipid Res. 1982 Jul;23(5):726-32 - PubMed
- J Vet Med Sci. 1991 Feb;53(1):81-6 - PubMed
- Protein Eng Des Sel. 2007 Jul;20(7):339-46 - PubMed
- Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Dec;44(6):1249-52 - PubMed
- Steroids. 2006 Mar;71(3):189-98 - PubMed
- Anaerobe. 2010 Apr;16(2):137-46 - PubMed
- J Lipid Res. 2013 Nov;54(11):3062-9 - PubMed
Publication Types