J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 16;20(3):e81. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8712.
A Mobile App to Improve Self-Management of Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Realist Evaluation.
Journal of medical Internet research
Laura Desveaux, James Shaw, Marianne Saragosa, Charlene Soobiah, Husayn Marani, Jennifer Hensel, Payal Agarwal, Nike Onabajo, R Sacha Bhatia, Lianne Jeffs
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- American Academy of Nursing, Washington, DC, United States.
PMID: 29549070
PMCID: PMC5878364 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8712
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing use of Web-based solutions for health prevention and promotion presents opportunities to improve self-management and adherence to guideline-based therapy for individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Despite promising preliminary evidence, many users stop using Web-based solutions due to the burden of data entry, hidden costs, loss of interest, and a lack of comprehensive features. Evaluations tend to focus on effectiveness or impact and fail to evaluate the nuanced variables that may interact to contribute to outcome success (or failure).
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate a Web-based solution for improving self-management in T2DM to identify key combinations of contextual variables and mechanisms of action that explain for whom the solution worked best and in what circumstances.
METHODS: A qualitative realist evaluation was conducted with one-on-one, semistructured telephonic interviews completed at baseline, and again toward the end of the intervention period (3 months). Topics included participants' experiences of using the Web-based solution, barriers and facilitators of self-management, and barriers and facilitators to effective use. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis strategies, after which the key themes were used to develop statements of the relationships between the key contextual factors, mechanisms of action, and impact on the primary outcome (glycated hemoglobin, HbA
RESULTS: Twenty-six interviews (14 baseline, 12 follow-up) were completed with 16 participants with T2DM, and the following 3 key groups emerged: the easiest fit, the best fit, and those who failed to activate. Self-efficacy and willingness to engage with the solution facilitated improvement in HbA
CONCLUSIONS: Self-efficacy, competing priorities, previous behavior change, and beliefs about Web-based solutions interact to determine engagement and impact on the clinical outcomes. Considering the balance of these patient characteristics is likely to help health care providers identify individuals who are apt to benefit from a Web-based solution to support self-management of T2DM. Web-based solutions could be modified to incorporate the existing screening measures to identify individuals who are at risk of suboptimal adherence to inform the provision of additional support(s) as needed.
©Laura Desveaux, James Shaw, Marianne Saragosa, Charlene Soobiah, Husayn Marani, Jennifer Hensel, Payal Agarwal, Nike Onabajo, R Sacha Bhatia, Lianne Jeffs. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 16.03.2018.
Keywords: diabetes mellitus; qualitative research; self-management; telemedicine
References
- J Psychosom Res. 2014 Sep;77(3):174-9 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2013 Jun;36(6):1779-88 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2016 Nov;39(11):2089-2095 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S81-90 - PubMed
- Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 24;10:59 - PubMed
- JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Nov 04;3(4):e101 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2002 Jul;25(7):1159-71 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2011 Sep;34(9):1934-42 - PubMed
- CMAJ. 2006 Jan 17;174(2):156-7 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 7;358(6):580-91 - PubMed
- Diabetes Educ. 2008 Mar-Apr;34(2):266-76 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 30;19(5):e187 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Apr;22(4):442-7 - PubMed
- Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Jan;23(1):17-22 - PubMed
- J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 01;6(2):310-9 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 1998 Sep;21(9):1414-31 - PubMed
- J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Mar 13;8(2):209-215 - PubMed
- Diabetes Metab. 2003 Sep;29(4 Pt 2):6S9-18 - PubMed
- Diabetes Educ. 2005 Nov-Dec;31(6):869-79 - PubMed
- BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Nov 15;16(1):144 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2004 May;27(5):1047-53 - PubMed
- Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Jul 17;11:1235-1241 - PubMed
- Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Jul;93(1):1-9 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 09;16(4):e104 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2011 Jun;34(6):1249-57 - PubMed
- Diabet Med. 2013 May;30(5):512-24 - PubMed
- Chronic Illn. 2011 Mar;7(1):60-86 - PubMed
- Health Educ Behav. 2003 Apr;30(2):170-95 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2007 Mar 3;369(9563):750-6 - PubMed
- Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Jun;10(3):160-8 - PubMed
- BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 05;16 Suppl 5:290 - PubMed
- Diabet Med. 2012 Jan;29(1):148-52 - PubMed
- Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Jan;51(1):111-22 - PubMed
- Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Mar 03;11:469-478 - PubMed
- Ann Intern Med. 2000 Apr 18;132(8):605-11 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 13;19(2):e28 - PubMed
- Diabetologia. 2010 Jan;53(1):66-9 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2014 Jun 02;9(6):e98340 - PubMed
- BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 14;16(1):1158 - PubMed
- Med Decis Making. 2016 Aug;36(6):741-59 - PubMed
- Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Mar;42(3):247-56 - PubMed
- J Adv Nurs. 2005 Jan;49(2):146-54 - PubMed
- Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Dec;15(12):109 - PubMed
- JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Dec 11;2(4):e57 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 18;15(4):e86 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 23;19(6):e227 - PubMed
- Diabetes Educ. 2011 Sep-Oct;37(5):638-57 - PubMed
- Rehabil Psychol. 2011 Aug;56(3):161-70 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Publication Types