Display options
Share it on

Med Sci Educ. 2018 Mar;28(1):145-154. Epub 2018 Jan 02.

Integrating Foundational Sciences in a Clinical Context in the Post-Clerkship Curriculum.

Medical science educator

Kimberly Brown Dahlman, Matthew B Weinger, Kimberly D Lomis, Lillian Nanney, Neil Osheroff, Donald E Moore, Lourdes Estrada, William B Cutrer

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
  2. Department of Anesthesiology and Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
  3. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
  4. Department of Medical Education and Administration, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
  5. Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
  6. Department of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
  7. Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
  8. Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
  9. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
  10. Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
  11. Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.

PMID: 29632705 PMCID: PMC5889049

Abstract

PURPOSE: To design, implement, and launch courses that integrate foundational science learning and clinical application in a post-clerkship undergraduate medical school curriculum.

METHOD: In Academic Year (AY) 15-16, as part of a comprehensive curricular revision, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (VUSM) formally implemented "Integrated Science Courses" (ISCs) that combined rigorous training in the foundational sciences with meaningful clinical experiences. These courses integrated foundational sciences that could be leveraged in the clinical environment, utilized a variety of instructional modalities, and included quantitative and qualitative (competency-based milestones) student assessments. Each ISC underwent a rigorous quality improvement process that required input on foundational science content, student experience, and student performance assessment.

RESULTS: Eleven ISCs were delivered to 173 students in AY15-16, with some students taking more than one ISC. Immediately after completing each course, 93% (n=222) of ISC enrollees completed a course evaluation. Students (91%; n=201) 'agreed' or 'strongly agreed' that foundational science learning informed and enriched the clinical experiences. Furthermore, 94% (n=209) of students thought that the clinical experiences informed and enriched the foundational science learning. Ninety-four percent of the students anticipated using the foundational science knowledge acquired in future clinical training and practice.

CONCLUSION: The teaching of foundational sciences in the clinical workplace in the post-clerkship medical curriculum is challenging and resource-intensive, yet feasible. Additional experience with the model will inform the mix of courses as well as the breadth and depth of foundational science instruction that is necessary to foster scientifically-based clinical reasoning skills in each student.

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acad Med. 2015 Nov;90(11 Suppl):S63-9 - PubMed
  2. Med Educ. 2007 Dec;41(12):1173-7 - PubMed
  3. Med Educ. 2005 Jan;39(1):107-12 - PubMed
  4. Med Educ. 2007 Dec;41(12):1159-65 - PubMed
  5. J Grad Med Educ. 2009 Dec;1(2):278-86 - PubMed
  6. Med Sci Educ. 2016 Sep;26(3):491-497 - PubMed
  7. Med Teach. 2009 Sep;31(9):807-11 - PubMed
  8. Acad Med. 2013 Oct;88(10):1578-85 - PubMed
  9. Acad Med. 1996 Jun;71(6):658-64 - PubMed
  10. Acad Med. 2012 Oct;87(10):1413-7 - PubMed
  11. Med Teach. 2017 May;39(5):494-504 - PubMed
  12. Acad Med. 2008 Oct;83(10 Suppl):S82-5 - PubMed
  13. Acad Med. 2010 Feb;85(2):349-55 - PubMed
  14. Acad Med. 2006 Oct;81(10 Suppl):S124-7 - PubMed
  15. Med Educ. 2009 Feb;43(2):127-32 - PubMed
  16. Acad Med. 2012 Jun;87(6):729-34 - PubMed
  17. Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92 (1):70-75 - PubMed
  18. Acad Med. 2005 Aug;80(8):765-73 - PubMed
  19. Med Educ. 2014 Jul;48(7):667-73 - PubMed
  20. Med Teach. 1999;21(2):141-3 - PubMed
  21. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):1051-6 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support