Display options
Share it on

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(24):e10889. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010889.

Electrocardiogram criteria of limb leads predicting right coronary artery as culprit artery in inferior wall myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.

Medicine

Hao Liang, Lan Wu, Yingchen Li, Yidi Zeng, Zhixi Hu, Xinchun Li, Xiang Sun, Qiuyan Zhang, Xiaoqing Zhou

Affiliations

  1. Institute of TCM Diagnostics Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of TCM Diagnostics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University The Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine Cardiology Department, Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, Hunan, China.

PMID: 29901579 PMCID: PMC6024025 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010889

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have proposed several electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria in limb leads for identifying the culprit coronary artery (CCA) in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction (IWMI). The aim of our study was to conduct an evidence-based evaluation and test accuracy comparison of these criteria.

METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Ovid. Eligible studies to assess the diagnostic performance of ECG criteria predicting CCA in IWMI were reviewed for inclusion. A diagnostic meta-analysis of bivariate approach was performed for pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity, and meta-regression was implemented to investigate sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS: Twenty-four studies with 4431 unique participants met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for ST-segment elevation (STE) in III > II, ST-segment depression (STD) in I, STD in aVL, STD in aVL > I, STE in III > II, and STD in aVL > I were 0.91 (0.88-0.94) and 0.69 (0.53-0.81), 0.80 (0.73-0.87) and 0.69 (0.62-0.76), 0.90 (0.81-0.95) and 0.41 (0.22-0.62), 0.84 (0.75-0.91) and 0.72 (0.48-0.88), and 0.79 (0.62-0.90) and 1.00 (0.37-1.00), respectively. Heterogeneity investigation showed that whether multi-vessel diseased patients were excluded, sample size, publication year, etc., could influence the diagnostic performance.

CONCLUSION: STE in III > II performed better than other criteria for predicting RCA as CCA in IWMI, and STE in III > II and STD in aVL > I were potential and simple algorithms. ECG could be an effective tool to identify the CCA, but future studies are clearly needed to address the potential of diagnostic and prognostic value.

References

  1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):234-40 - PubMed
  2. Int J Cardiol. 2008 Aug 1;128(1):142-4 - PubMed
  3. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;58(10):982-90 - PubMed
  4. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2014;6(2):101-4 - PubMed
  5. Intern Med. 2007;46(12):795-9 - PubMed
  6. Clin Cardiol. 2011 Apr;34(4):249-53 - PubMed
  7. Am J Cardiol. 1998 Apr 1;81(7):918-9 - PubMed
  8. Int J Cardiol. 2007 Apr 12;117(1):3-5 - PubMed
  9. Circ J. 2016 Apr 25;80(5):1087-96 - PubMed
  10. J Electrocardiol. 2009 Sep-Oct;42(5):432-9 - PubMed
  11. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Nov 15;80(10):1343-5 - PubMed
  12. Am J Cardiol. 2004 Nov 1;94(9):1168-71 - PubMed
  13. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014 Dec;3(4):326-39 - PubMed
  14. Circulation. 1990 Feb;81(2):401-11 - PubMed
  15. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 6;348(10):933-40 - PubMed
  16. Chest. 2002 Jul;122(1):134-9 - PubMed
  17. J Electrocardiol. 2010 Mar-Apr;43(2):132-5 - PubMed
  18. Coron Artery Dis. 2011 May;22(3):165-70 - PubMed
  19. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Sep 4;50(10):933-9 - PubMed
  20. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):692-703 - PubMed
  21. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36 - PubMed
  22. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2569-619 - PubMed
  23. Am J Cardiol. 1987 Sep 1;60(7):456-9 - PubMed
  24. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 2;50(14):1343-53 - PubMed
  25. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec 1;74(7):E25-68 - PubMed
  26. Can J Cardiol. 2010 Jun-Jul;26(6):293-6 - PubMed
  27. Clin Cardiol. 1999 Jan;22(1):37-44 - PubMed
  28. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Jan 15;79(2):182-4 - PubMed
  29. J Electrocardiol. 2011 Sep-Oct;44(5):495-501 - PubMed
  30. Rev Port Cardiol. 2004 Jul-Aug;23(7-8):963-71 - PubMed
  31. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24 - PubMed
  32. Am J Cardiol. 2004 Sep 15;94(6):709-14 - PubMed
  33. Eur Heart J. 1993 Jan;14(1):4-7 - PubMed
  34. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2012 Jul;41(7):300-4 - PubMed
  35. Eur Heart J. 1995 Nov;16(11):1549-53 - PubMed
  36. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Feb 2;152(3):167-77 - PubMed
  37. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jul 1;84(1):87-9, A8 - PubMed
  38. Europace. 2009 Nov;11(11):1517-21 - PubMed
  39. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;34(9):1772-8 - PubMed
  40. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;26(1):10-7 - PubMed
  41. Eur Heart J. 2007 Dec;28(24):2985-91 - PubMed
  42. Am J Cardiol. 2000 Aug 1;86(3):341-3 - PubMed
  43. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2001 Jul;6(3):229-35 - PubMed
  44. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014 Sep 23;28:103 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types