Display options
Share it on

J Patient Saf. 2018 Sep;14(3):e56-e60. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000508.

Supporting Clinicians After Adverse Events: Development of a Clinician Peer Support Program.

Journal of patient safety

Michael A Lane, Brianne M Newman, Mary Z Taylor, Meg OʼNeill, Chiara Ghetti, Robin M Woltman, Amy D Waterman

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine.
  2. Washington University Faculty Practice Plan.
  3. Washington University School of Medicine.
  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine.

PMID: 29878948 PMCID: PMC6102069 DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000508

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many healthcare organizations have developed processes for supporting the emotional needs of patients and their families after medical errors or adverse events. However, the clinicians involved in such events may become "second victims" and frequently experience emotional harm that impacts their personal and professional lives. Many "second victims," particularly physicians, do not receive adequate support by their organizations.

METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was assembled to create a clinician peer support program (PSP) at a large academic medical center including both adult and pediatric hospitals. A curriculum was developed to train clinicians to provide support to their peers based on research of clinician response to adverse events, utilization of various support resources, and clinician resiliency and ways to enhance natural resilience. Between April 2014 and January 2017, 165 individuals were referred to the program including 68 (41.2%) residents, 17 (10.3%) fellows, 70 (42.4%) faculty members, 6 (3.6%) nurse practitioners/physician assistants, and 4 (2.4%) certified registered nurse anesthetists. An average of 4.8 individuals were referred per month (range = 0-12). Of the 165 clinicians referred, 17 (10.3%) declined follow-up from the program. Individuals receiving support had a median of two interactions (range = 1-10). Among those receiving support from the clinician PSP, 16 (10.8%) required referral to a higher level of support.

CONCLUSIONS: We describe the multiple steps necessary to create a successful PSP focused on physicians and midlevel providers. There is an unmet need to provide support to this group of healthcare providers after medical errors and adverse events.

References

  1. Acad Med. 2016 Sep;91(9):1200-4 - PubMed
  2. JAMA. 2006 Sep 6;296(9):1071-8 - PubMed
  3. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):581-9 - PubMed
  4. Arch Fam Med. 1996 Feb;5(2):71-5 - PubMed
  5. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 May;36(5):233-40 - PubMed
  6. JAMA. 2003 Feb 26;289(8):1001-7 - PubMed
  7. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Feb;40(2):91-6 - PubMed
  8. J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Jul-Aug;7(4):424-31 - PubMed
  9. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Aug;33(8):467-76 - PubMed
  10. PeerJ. 2013 Nov 19;1:e216 - PubMed
  11. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Oct;18(5):325-30 - PubMed
  12. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2015;34(4):30-40 - PubMed
  13. Med Care. 2016 Oct;54(10):937-43 - PubMed
  14. J Patient Saf. 2017 Jun;13(2):93-102 - PubMed
  15. BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 30;6(9):e011708 - PubMed
  16. Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;147(3):212-7 - PubMed
  17. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):726-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support