Display options
Share it on

Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1156-1164. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003067.

The Evolving Practice Patterns of Academic Endocrine Surgeons: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the Faculty Practice Solutions Center Database 2014 to 2017.

Annals of surgery

Jennifer H Kuo, Quan Y Duh, Herbert Chen, Victoria Lai, Meredith J Sorensen, John A Chabot, James A Lee

Affiliations

  1. Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY.
  2. Section of Endocrine Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
  3. Department of Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.
  4. Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, VA.
  5. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.

PMID: 30407204 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003067

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the evolution of an academic endocrine surgeon's practice over time.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND: Amid growing recognition that surgical volume and specialization are linked to better outcomes, endocrine surgery is one of the youngest fields to develop its own formal fellowship training program. However, 3 decades after the emergence of endocrine surgery as a distinct specialty, the medical community and public still have a limited understanding of endocrine surgeons and what they do.

METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of endocrine surgeons identified in the Faculty Practice Solutions Center Database from 2014 to 2017. Trends in annual number of endocrine surgeries performed, number of all surgeries performed, total work relative value units generated, and patient payer mix stratified by years of practice were evaluated.

RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine endocrine surgeons practicing in 103 institutions over 4 years were analyzed. The proportion of endocrine-specific operations increases over time. A typical academic endocrine surgeon meets the high-volume threshold for thyroidectomies early in their career, but does not reach the thresholds for parathyroidectomies or adrenalectomies until after 4 years. Increased productivity as reflected by adjusted work relative value units does increase over the first 15 years of practice, but also decreases as the proportion of endocrine-specific practice increases. The greatest proportion of endocrine surgeons' patients are insured by commercial plans (46%-50%), and payer mix is stable across all levels of practice.

CONCLUSIONS: Although endocrine surgeons perform a high-volume of endocrine-specific operations, practice patterns are heterogeneous and suggest that most surgeons have to grow their endocrine-specific practice over time.

References

  1. Thompson NW. The founding of the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons: the time was right. Surgery 2011; 150:1303–1307. - PubMed
  2. Adkisson CD, Howell GM, McCoy KL, et al. Surgeon volume and adequacy of thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer. Surgery 2014; 156:1453–1459. - PubMed
  3. Al-Qurayshi Z, Robins R, Hauch A, et al. Association of surgeon volume with outcomes and cost savings following thyroidectomy: a national forecast. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 142:32–39. - PubMed
  4. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2117–2127. - PubMed
  5. Gourin CG, Tufano RP, Forastiere AA, et al. Volume-based trends in thyroid surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136:1191–1198. - PubMed
  6. Liu CJ, Chou YJ, Teng CJ, et al. Association of surgeon volume and hospital volume with the outcome of patients receiving definitive surgery for colorectal cancer: a nationwide population-based study. Cancer 2015; 121:2782–2790. - PubMed
  7. Anderson KL Jr, Thomas SM, Adam MA, et al. Each procedure matters: threshold for surgeon volume to minimize complications and decrease cost associated with adrenalectomy. Surgery 2018; 163:157–164. - PubMed
  8. Meltzer C, Klau M, Gurushanthaiah D, et al. Surgeon volume in thyroid surgery: surgical efficiency, outcomes, and utilization. Laryngoscope 2016; 126:2630–2639. - PubMed
  9. Park HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Outcomes from 3144 adrenalectomies in the United States: which matters more, surgeon volume or specialty? Arch Surg 2009; 144:1060–1067. - PubMed
  10. Morche J, Mathes T, Pieper D. Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016; 5:204. - PubMed
  11. Shin JJ, Milas M, Mitchell J, et al. The endocrine surgery job market: a survey of fellows, department chairs, and surgery recruiters. J Surg Educ 2013; 70:377–383. - PubMed
  12. Surgery ACo [website]. Available at: https://www.facs.org/education/patient-education/patient-resources/specialists. Accessed October 29, 2018. - PubMed
  13. Zarebczan B, Chen H. Influence of surgical volume on operative failures for hyperparathyroidism. Adv Surg 2011; 45:237–248. - PubMed
  14. Meltzer C, Klau M, Gurushanthaiah D, et al. Surgeon volume in parathyroid surgery-surgical efficiency, outcomes, and utilization. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 143:843–847. - PubMed
  15. Modrall JG, Rosero EB, Chung J, et al. Defining the type of surgeon volume that influences the outcomes for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54:1599–1604. - PubMed
  16. Minich-Pourshadi K. Physician compensation: shifting incentives. Healthleaders Media 2011. - PubMed
  17. Satiani B. Use, misuse, and underuse of work relative value units in a vascular surgery practice. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56:267–272. - PubMed
  18. Sauer J. 2015; Available at: www.medaxiom.com/blog/a-better-provider-productivity-measure-moving-beyond-the-wrvu. Accessed October 29, 2018. - PubMed
  19. Resnick AS, Corrigan D, Mullen JL, et al. Surgeon contribution to hospital bottom line: not all are created equal. Ann Surg 2005; 242:530–537. - PubMed
  20. Tikkanen RS, Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU, et al. Hospital payer and racial/ethnic mix at private academic medical centers in Boston and New York City. Int J Health Serv 2017; 47:460–476. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types