Display options
Share it on

Foods. 2018 Oct 25;7(11). doi: 10.3390/foods7110177.

Multi-Sip Time⁻Intensity Evaluation of Retronasal Aroma after Swallowing Oolong Tea Beverage.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)

Naomi Gotow, Takanobu Omata, Masaaki Uchida, Naoyuki Matsuzaki, Sadaki Takata, Ippei Hagiwara, Tatsu Kobayakawa

Affiliations

  1. Human Technology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 6, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan. [email protected].
  2. NTT Data Institute of Management Consulting, Inc., JA Kyosai Bldg., 10th Fl., Hirakawacho 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0093, Japan. [email protected].
  3. Suntory Global Innovation Center Limited, 1-1-1 Wakayamadai, Shimamoto-cho, Mishima-gun, Osaka 618-8503, Japan. [email protected].
  4. Suntory Global Innovation Center Limited, 1-1-1 Wakayamadai, Shimamoto-cho, Mishima-gun, Osaka 618-8503, Japan. [email protected].
  5. Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka Shoin Women's University, 4-2-26 Hishiyanishi, Higashiosaka, Osaka 577-8550, Japan. [email protected].
  6. NTT Data Institute of Management Consulting, Inc., JA Kyosai Bldg., 10th Fl., Hirakawacho 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0093, Japan. [email protected].
  7. Human Technology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 6, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan. [email protected].

PMID: 30366388 PMCID: PMC6262627 DOI: 10.3390/foods7110177

Abstract

In most cases, a meal cannot be finished with a single bite and sip. During eating and drinking, consumers receive dynamic food perceptions from sensory attributes in foods. Thus, we performed multi-sip time⁻intensity (TI) evaluation of sensory attribute. In each of ten trials, the participant evaluated continuously the intensity of retronasal aroma for 60 s after swallowing oolong tea. We compared the TI parameters (

Keywords: consumption experience; multi-sip; oolong tea beverage; retronasal aroma; time–intensity; warm-up sample

References

  1. Chem Senses. 2015 Jun;40(5):351-5 - PubMed
  2. Neuron. 2006 Dec 21;52(6):1097-108 - PubMed
  3. J Agric Food Chem. 2008 May 14;56(9):3254-9 - PubMed
  4. J Food Sci Technol. 2018 Mar;55(3):1185-1195 - PubMed
  5. Food Chem. 2017 Dec 1;236:142-151 - PubMed
  6. Chem Senses. 2011 Mar;36(3):283-9 - PubMed
  7. J Food Sci. 2015 Jun;80(6):S1343-51 - PubMed
  8. J Dairy Sci. 2003 Apr;86(4):1130-8 - PubMed
  9. Percept Psychophys. 1979 Mar;25(3):180-4 - PubMed
  10. Molecules. 2013 May 21;18(5):6035-56 - PubMed
  11. Chem Senses. 2013 Sep;38(7):577-84 - PubMed
  12. Percept Psychophys. 2004 May;66(4):596-608 - PubMed
  13. Chem Senses. 2012 Jul;37(6):515-22 - PubMed
  14. J Food Drug Anal. 2014 Sep;22(3):303-309 - PubMed
  15. J Food Sci. 2018 Apr;83(4):1094-1102 - PubMed
  16. Chem Senses. 2011 Oct;36(8):747-60 - PubMed
  17. Anal Chim Acta. 2012 Jun 30;732:46-52 - PubMed
  18. Physiol Behav. 1994 Mar;55(3):547-59 - PubMed
  19. Springerplus. 2016 May 10;5:576 - PubMed
  20. Meat Sci. 2010 Jul;85(3):410-9 - PubMed
  21. Chem Senses. 2006 Jul;31(6):539-45 - PubMed
  22. J Dairy Sci. 1997 Dec;80(12):3133-41 - PubMed
  23. Chem Senses. 1994 Dec;19(6):583-94 - PubMed
  24. J Food Sci. 2016 Oct;81(10):S2566-S2577 - PubMed
  25. J Agric Food Chem. 1999 Oct;47(10):4336-40 - PubMed
  26. Chem Senses. 2003 Mar;28(3):219-29 - PubMed
  27. Chem Senses. 2011 Oct;36(8):701-13 - PubMed
  28. Food Funct. 2012 Sep;3(9):923-30 - PubMed
  29. Chem Senses. 2001 Mar;26(3):247-51 - PubMed
  30. Chem Senses. 1999 Apr;24(2):191-9 - PubMed
  31. Chem Senses. 2004 May;29(4):331-40 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support