Display options
Share it on

Ultrasonography. 2019 Oct;38(4):327-335. doi: 10.14366/usg.18071. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

Patchy echogenicity of the liver in patients with chronic hepatitis B does not indicate poorer elasticity.

Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea)

Size Wu, Rong Tu, Xian Liang

Affiliations

  1. Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
  2. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.

PMID: 31302950 PMCID: PMC6769196 DOI: 10.14366/usg.18071

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to investigate whether the presence of patchy echogenicity in the liver of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is predictive of liver stiffness.

METHODS: A total of 200 CHB patients with and without patchy echogenicity of the liver were assigned to two groups, with 100 patients in each group, and 32 of them underwent liver biopsy. Additionally, 80 healthy subjects, 100 inactive HBV carriers, and 100 patients with decompensated hepatic cirrhosis were assigned to the control groups. Laboratory tests and clinical data were collected, and shear wave velocity (SWV) of the liver was measured for all 480 subjects.

RESULTS: The median SWV in patients with a normal liver, inactive hepatitis B virus carriers, CHB patients with and without patchy echogenicity, and decompensated hepatic cirrhosis were 1.07 m/sec, 1.08 m/sec, 1.16 m/sec, 1.16 m/sec, and 2.02 m/sec, respectively; there was no significant difference in SWV values between CHB patients with patchy echogenicity and those without patchy echogenicity. Furthermore, among CHB patients with and without patchy echogenicity, no significant difference in SWV was found according to fibrosis stage.

CONCLUSION: The presence of patchy echogenicity of the liver does not indicate a higher degree of liver stiffness.

Keywords: Hepatitis B, chronic; Patchy echogenicity of the liver; Point shear wave elastography; Shear wave velocity; Ultrasonography

References

  1. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Mar;41(3):698-704 - PubMed
  2. Hepatology. 2015 Jan;61(1):292-302 - PubMed
  3. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Sep;41(9):2350-9 - PubMed
  4. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Aug;23(8 Pt 1):1228-34 - PubMed
  5. Hepatology. 2016 Jan;63(1):261-83 - PubMed
  6. J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Feb;32(2):355-9 - PubMed
  7. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Apr;25(4):428-34 - PubMed
  8. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Jun;39(6):950-5 - PubMed
  9. Hepatol Res. 2018 Apr;48(5):373-382 - PubMed
  10. Ultraschall Med. 2015 Dec;36(6):581-9 - PubMed
  11. Gastrointest Radiol. 1992 Winter;17(1):74-8 - PubMed
  12. Radiology. 2015 Apr;275(1):290-300 - PubMed
  13. Radiology. 2003 Apr;227(1):89-94 - PubMed
  14. Ultrasound Q. 2016 Sep;32(3):201-7 - PubMed
  15. J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Oct;34(10):1895-900 - PubMed
  16. J Ultrasound Med. 2017 Nov;36(11):2337-2344 - PubMed
  17. Clin Radiol. 2016 Sep;71(9):869-75 - PubMed
  18. Ultrasonography. 2014 Jul;33(3):149-60 - PubMed
  19. Radiology. 2015 Mar;274(3):888-96 - PubMed
  20. Radiology. 1989 Aug;172(2):389-92 - PubMed
  21. Clin Imaging. 2017 Jan - Feb;41:95-100 - PubMed
  22. J Hepatol. 2015 Oct;63(4):1038-9 - PubMed
  23. Ultrasound Q. 2016 Jun;32(2):94-107 - PubMed
  24. Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Feb;44(2):154-9 - PubMed
  25. J Med Virol. 2011 Jun;83(6):968-73 - PubMed
  26. J Clin Ultrasound. 2003 Oct;31(8):393-400 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support