Display options
Share it on

Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Aug;41(8):544-556. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

Similarities between the Yin/Yang Doctrine and Hormesis in Toxicology and Pharmacology.

Trends in pharmacological sciences

Haoyu Sun, Edward J Calabrese, Zhifen Lin, Baoling Lian, Xiaoxian Zhang

Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China; Post-Doctoral Research Station, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Chemical Assessment and Sustainability, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: [email protected].
  2. Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Sciences, Morrill I, N344, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
  3. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Chemical Assessment and Sustainability, Shanghai, China; State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
  4. Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, 221 West Yan'an Road, Shanghai, China.
  5. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.

PMID: 32564900 PMCID: PMC7302776 DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.05.004

Abstract

Hormesis is a generalizable dose-response relationship characterized by low-dose stimulation and high-dose inhibition. Despite debate over this biphasic dose-response curve, hormesis is challenging central beliefs in the evaluation of chemicals or drugs and has influenced biological model selection, concentration range, study design, and hypothesis testing. We integrate the traditional Chinese philosophy - Yin/Yang doctrine - into the representation of the Western hormetic dose-response relationship and review the Yin/Yang historical philosophy contained in the hormesis concept, aiming to promote general acceptance and wider applications of hormesis. We suggest that the Yin/Yang doctrine embodies the hormetic dose-response, including the relationship between the opposing components, curve shape, and time-dependence, and may afford insights that clarify the hormetic dose-response relationship in toxicology and pharmacology.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Yin/Yang doctrine; dose–response relationship; hormesis; pharmacology; toxicology

References

  1. Cell. 1995 Jan 27;80(2):225-36 - PubMed
  2. Int J Toxicol. 2008 Sep-Oct;27(5):369-78 - PubMed
  3. Mol Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;92(4):459-468 - PubMed
  4. Environ Pollut. 2005 Dec;138(3):379-411 - PubMed
  5. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Jan;41:45-53 - PubMed
  6. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2003;43:175-97 - PubMed
  7. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2002 Jul;23(7):331-7 - PubMed
  8. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2015;13(4):504-19 - PubMed
  9. Nature. 1979 Jan 11;277(5692):93-6 - PubMed
  10. Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Feb 15;45(4):1623-9 - PubMed
  11. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2010 Dec;3(4):221-31 - PubMed
  12. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Feb;106 Suppl 1:357-62 - PubMed
  13. Homeopathy. 2015 Apr;104(2):90-6 - PubMed
  14. J Hazard Mater. 2013 Aug 15;258-259:70-6 - PubMed
  15. Nutr Cancer. 1997;28(3):236-47 - PubMed
  16. Chemosphere. 2010 Jan;78(3):327-34 - PubMed
  17. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013 Aug;43(7):580-606 - PubMed
  18. Toxicol Sci. 2003 Feb;71(2):246-50 - PubMed
  19. Microb Cell. 2014 Apr 23;1(5):145-149 - PubMed
  20. Chemosphere. 2013 Apr;91(4):462-7 - PubMed
  21. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43848 - PubMed
  22. Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Jul 17;46(14):7746-54 - PubMed
  23. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2005 Jul;35(6):463-582 - PubMed
  24. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014 Feb 3;151(2):810-9 - PubMed
  25. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33432 - PubMed
  26. Oncogene. 2010 Jun 10;29(23):3313-23 - PubMed
  27. Science. 2013 Jan 11;339(6116):155 - PubMed
  28. J Theor Biol. 1977 Nov 7;69(1):101-12 - PubMed
  29. J Immunol. 2000 Mar 1;164(5):2684-91 - PubMed
  30. J Clin Invest. 2007 Apr;117(4):871-3 - PubMed
  31. Planta Med. 2010 Aug;76(11):1118-31 - PubMed
  32. Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 20;657:46-55 - PubMed
  33. Nat Immunol. 2005 Apr;6(4):325 - PubMed
  34. Nature. 2003 Feb 13;421(6924):691-2 - PubMed
  35. Cancer Cell. 2009 Sep 8;16(3):173-4 - PubMed
  36. Am J Cancer Res. 2011;1(2):192-221 - PubMed
  37. Am J Chin Med. 2012;40(5):877-86 - PubMed
  38. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jul 15;630:11-19 - PubMed
  39. Oncol Rep. 2012 Jun;27(6):2057-65 - PubMed
  40. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1999 May;20(5):191-6 - PubMed
  41. FEBS J. 2005 Dec;272(23):5962-70 - PubMed
  42. Neuron. 1996 May;16(5):893-6 - PubMed
  43. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Aug;6(8):603-14 - PubMed
  44. Environ Pollut. 2009 Jan;157(1):42-8 - PubMed
  45. Annu Rev Physiol. 2006;68:159-91 - PubMed
  46. Drug Discov Ther. 2013 Apr;7(2):46-57 - PubMed
  47. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Nov;66(5):594-617 - PubMed
  48. J Neurochem. 2008 Dec;107(5):1169-87 - PubMed
  49. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2002 Feb;21(2):91-7 - PubMed
  50. Immunol Rev. 2008 Apr;222:155-61 - PubMed
  51. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001 Jun;22(6):285-91 - PubMed
  52. Clin Ther. 2007 Jul;29(7):1456-67 - PubMed
  53. Anticancer Res. 1991 Nov-Dec;11(6):2191-7 - PubMed
  54. Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Apr;115(4):500-6 - PubMed
  55. J Hepatol. 2010 Nov;53(5):974-5 - PubMed
  56. Kidney Int. 2013 Dec;84(6):1108-18 - PubMed
  57. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Oct;113(10):1271-6 - PubMed
  58. Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 01;5:14701 - PubMed
  59. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013 Mar;89:130-6 - PubMed
  60. Ageing Res Rev. 2008 Jan;7(1):63-78 - PubMed
  61. Br J Cancer. 2003 Feb 10;88(3):438-46 - PubMed
  62. Immunol Rev. 2009 May;229(1):88-100 - PubMed
  63. Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Apr;184:42-50 - PubMed
  64. Environ Res. 2019 Jun;173:87-96 - PubMed
  65. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008 Jul;27(7):1451-74 - PubMed
  66. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2003;33(3-4):463-7 - PubMed
  67. Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jun;147:212-216 - PubMed
  68. Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Jul;33(7):1484.e15-24 - PubMed
  69. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2010 Apr;29(4):249-61 - PubMed
  70. Immunol Lett. 2014 Sep;161(1):38-43 - PubMed
  71. Environ Pollut. 2009 Nov;157(11):3064-8 - PubMed
  72. Chemosphere. 2017 Jul;178:88-98 - PubMed
  73. Cell. 1991 Oct 18;67(2):377-88 - PubMed
  74. Cell Res. 2005 Feb;15(2):92-6 - PubMed
  75. Chemosphere. 2018 Aug;205:15-23 - PubMed
  76. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:283941 - PubMed
  77. Chemosphere. 2013 Feb;90(7):2070-6 - PubMed
  78. Immunol Rev. 2007 Dec;220:199-213 - PubMed
  79. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Jan;40(1):8-10 - PubMed
  80. EMBO Rep. 2004 Oct;5 Spec No:S37-40 - PubMed
  81. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2001 Jul;31(4-5):563-83 - PubMed
  82. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005 Feb 1;202(3):289-301 - PubMed
  83. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0139298 - PubMed
  84. Complement Ther Med. 2013 Jun;21(3):272-5 - PubMed
  85. Chin J Integr Med. 2017 Aug;23(8):570-573 - PubMed
  86. Cancer Res. 1992 Nov 15;52(22):6164-7 - PubMed
  87. Science. 1986 May 30;232(4754):1093-5 - PubMed
  88. Ageing Res Rev. 2008 Jan;7(1):1-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types