Display options
Cite
Gadsby EW, Hotham S, Eida T, et al. Impact of a community-based pilot intervention to tackle childhood obesity: a 'whole-system approach' case study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1818doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09694-2.
Gadsby, E. W., Hotham, S., Eida, T., Lawrence, C., & Merritt, R. (2020). Impact of a community-based pilot intervention to tackle childhood obesity: a 'whole-system approach' case study. BMC public health, 20(1), 1818. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09694-2
Gadsby, E W, et al. "Impact of a community-based pilot intervention to tackle childhood obesity: a 'whole-system approach' case study." BMC public health vol. 20,1 (2020): 1818. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09694-2
Gadsby EW, Hotham S, Eida T, Lawrence C, Merritt R. Impact of a community-based pilot intervention to tackle childhood obesity: a 'whole-system approach' case study. BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):1818. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09694-2. PMID: 33256660; PMCID: PMC7708136.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):1818. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09694-2.

Impact of a community-based pilot intervention to tackle childhood obesity: a 'whole-system approach' case study.

BMC public health

E W Gadsby, S Hotham, T Eida, C Lawrence, R Merritt

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Health Services Studies, George Allen Wing, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NF, UK. [email protected].
  2. Centre for Health Services Studies, George Allen Wing, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NF, UK.
  3. City of Westminster Council, Public Health Directorate, 64 Victoria Street, London, UK.

PMID: 33256660 PMCID: PMC7708136 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09694-2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Go-Golborne was a three-year pilot programme to test an innovative, community-based 'whole system' approach to preventing overweight in children in Golborne ward, London. Whilst there is a growing interest in local whole systems approaches to obesity, understandings of what they look like in practice are newly emerging. Go-Golborne was designed, implemented and evaluated within this context.

METHODS: The evaluation used a case-study design and theory of change approach to assess the effectiveness of the intervention. Height/weight measurements of children in the six participating primary schools were recorded annually for 4 years. For behavioural outcomes, children aged six-11 completed four annual on-line surveys (total 4331 responses). Parents were surveyed in year one and year four (177 responses). Three focus group discussions were held with children aged 10-11 (N = 21); interviews were conducted with parents (N = 11), and school representatives (N = 4). Stakeholders were surveyed twice (37 responses), and interviews were conducted with key stakeholders (N = 11). An extensive range of programme documents were reviewed and additional process data was collected from the programme team. The RE-AIM framework was used to synthesise findings and examine public health impact.

RESULTS: Go-Golborne reached a diverse range of partners across Golborne. Events were attended by over 3360 local children and families and all six primary schools in the ward actively engaged in activities. The proportion of children in the above healthy weight categories remained stable over time. A number of changes in home, school and neighbourhood environments to support healthy behaviour change were evidenced. There was some qualitative evidence of positive changes in children's behaviours, though significant or sustained changes were not evidenced by the quantitative data.

CONCLUSIONS: Go-Golborne helped stakeholders and parents to develop a shared commitment to improving healthy weight in children, to identify barriers to a healthy lifestyle, and to start to make changes in their services/behaviours. The campaigns and changes made at micro-level appeared to be insufficient, in the face of counteracting forces and personal factors, to achieve significant behaviour change within 3 years. This highlights the need for local initiatives to be reinforced by supporting action at regional, national and global levels.

Keywords: Childhood obesity; Community-based; Evaluation; Health improvement; Prevention; RE-AIM; Whole systems

References

  1. Health Educ Res. 2002 Apr;17(2):211-20 - PubMed
  2. Obes Rev. 2007 Mar;8 Suppl 1:vi-ix - PubMed
  3. Prev Med. 2014 May;62:193-200 - PubMed
  4. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Jan 29;5:5 - PubMed
  5. Arch Dis Child. 2002 Jan;86(1):11-4 - PubMed
  6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD001872 - PubMed
  7. Public Health Nutr. 2014 Feb;17(2):407-21 - PubMed
  8. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7 - PubMed
  9. Obes Rev. 2012 Apr;13(4):299-315 - PubMed
  10. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Jul;32(7):1060-7 - PubMed
  11. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1990 Jan;44(1):45-60 - PubMed
  12. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 Jul;41(7):1080-1090 - PubMed
  13. Public Health. 2016 Nov;140:109-118 - PubMed
  14. Lancet. 2011 Aug 27;378(9793):746-7 - PubMed
  15. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6:CD012651 - PubMed
  16. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):8 - PubMed
  17. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Oct;37(10):1287-94 - PubMed
  18. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2009 Aug;18(3):152-8 - PubMed
  19. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2011 Mar;54(3):259-64 - PubMed
  20. Eval Program Plann. 2014 Aug;45:71-81 - PubMed
  21. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Dec;93(12):4606-15 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support