Display options
Share it on

Elife. 2020 Nov 17;9. doi: 10.7554/eLife.59410.

Forced choices reveal a trade-off between cognitive effort and physical pain.

eLife

Todd A Vogel, Zachary M Savelson, A Ross Otto, Mathieu Roy

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
  2. Institute of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.

PMID: 33200988 PMCID: PMC7714391 DOI: 10.7554/eLife.59410

Abstract

Cognitive effort is described as aversive, and people will generally avoid it when possible. This aversion to effort is believed to arise from a cost-benefit analysis of the actions available. The comparison of cognitive effort against other primary aversive experiences, however, remains relatively unexplored. Here, we offered participants choices between performing a cognitively demanding task or experiencing thermal pain. We found that cognitive effort can be traded off for physical pain and that people generally avoid exerting high levels of cognitive effort. We also used computational modelling to examine the aversive subjective value of effort and its effects on response behaviours. Applying this model to decision times revealed asymmetric effects of effort and pain, suggesting that cognitive effort may not share the same basic influences on avoidance behaviour as more primary aversive stimuli such as physical pain.

© 2020, Vogel et al.

Keywords: behavioural economics; cognitive effort; computational modelling; decision-making; human; neuroscience; pain

Conflict of interest statement

TV, ZS, AO, MR No competing interests declared

References

  1. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Apr;7(4):e1002028 - PubMed
  2. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Dec;36(6):661-79 - PubMed
  3. PLoS Biol. 2017 Feb 24;15(2):e1002598 - PubMed
  4. J Pers Assess. 1984 Jun;48(3):306-7 - PubMed
  5. Pain. 2014 Aug;155(8):1632-48 - PubMed
  6. J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 30;29(39):12315-20 - PubMed
  7. Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 4;123:92-105 - PubMed
  8. J Physiol. 1995 Mar 15;483 ( Pt 3):747-58 - PubMed
  9. J Neurosci. 2019 May 15;39(20):3934-3947 - PubMed
  10. Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 8;8(1):11888 - PubMed
  11. Behav Processes. 2013 Nov;100:192-6 - PubMed
  12. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:99-124 - PubMed
  13. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Oct 20;: - PubMed
  14. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Mar 27;11(3):e1004116 - PubMed
  15. Eur J Neurosci. 2013 Dec;38(12):3740-8 - PubMed
  16. Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;84(1):38-45 - PubMed
  17. Nat Neurosci. 2014 Oct;17(10):1304-12 - PubMed
  18. PLoS Biol. 2006 Jul;4(8):e233 - PubMed
  19. Elife. 2020 Nov 17;9: - PubMed
  20. Psychol Bull. 1999 May;125(3):356-66 - PubMed
  21. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):1027-38 - PubMed
  22. Neurophysiol Clin. 2003 Dec;33(6):269-77 - PubMed
  23. J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3): - PubMed
  24. Pain. 2015 Aug;156(8):1449-57 - PubMed
  25. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jul;14(7):502-11 - PubMed
  26. Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272 - PubMed
  27. J Psychosom Res. 2016 Aug;87:30-6 - PubMed
  28. J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 20;30(42):14080-90 - PubMed
  29. J Behav Med. 1998 Aug;21(4):389-410 - PubMed
  30. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):131-41 - PubMed
  31. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e68210 - PubMed
  32. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):337-349 - PubMed
  33. Pain. 2012 Apr;153(4):800-4 - PubMed
  34. Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Dec;2(12):899-908 - PubMed
  35. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2007 Apr;189 Suppl 654:1-35 - PubMed
  36. J Neurophysiol. 1989 Dec;62(6):1270-9 - PubMed
  37. Science. 1999 Mar 12;283(5408):1657-61 - PubMed
  38. J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 11;30(32):10799-808 - PubMed
  39. Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):309-17 - PubMed
  40. Behav Res Methods. 2005 Aug;37(3):498-505 - PubMed
  41. J Pain. 2014 Jul;15(7):734-46 - PubMed
  42. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Nov;19(11):700-710 - PubMed
  43. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Sep;25(9):1428-41 - PubMed
  44. Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:101-106 - PubMed
  45. Biometrics. 1997 Sep;53(3):983-97 - PubMed
  46. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 31;12(7):e0182353 - PubMed
  47. Pain. 2003 Feb;101(3):213-9 - PubMed
  48. Pain. 2010 Apr;149(1):19-26 - PubMed
  49. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Mar;12(3):154-67 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support