Hosp Pract (1995). 2021 Aug;49(3):209-215. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2021.1890958. Epub 2021 Mar 01.

Implementation of an academic hospital medicine procedure service: 5-year experience.

Hospital practice (1995)

Hillary Spangler, John R Stephens, Emily Sturkie, Ria Dancel

PMID: 33577741 DOI: 10.1080/21548331.2021.1890958

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Procedural complications are a common source of adverse events in hospitals, especially where bedside procedures are often performed by trainees. Medical procedure services (MPS) have been established to improve procedural education, ensure patient safety, and provide additional revenue for services that are typically referred. Prior descriptions of MPS have reported outcomes over one to 2 years. We aim to describe the implementation and 5-year outcomes of a hospitalist-run MPS.

METHODS: We identified all patients referred to our MPS for a procedure over the 5-year span between 2014 and 2018. We manually reviewed all charts for complications of paracentesis, thoracentesis, central venous catheterization, and lumbar punctures performed by the MPS in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Annual charges for these procedures were queried using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes.

RESULTS: We identified 3,634 MPS procedures. Of these, ultrasound guidance was used in 3224 (88.7%) and trainees performed 2701 (74%). Complications identified included pneumothorax (3.7%, n = 16) for thoracentesis, post-dural puncture headache (13.9%, n = 100) and bleeding (0.1%, n = 1) for lumbar puncture, ascites leak for diagnostic (1.6%, n = 8) and large volume (3.7%, n = 56) paracentesis, and bleeding (3.5%, n = 16) for central venous catheter placement. Prior to initiation of the MPS, total annual procedural charges were $90,437. After MPS implementation, charges increased to a mean of $787,352 annually in the last 4 years of the study period.

CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a hospitalist-run, academic MPS resulted in a large volume of procedures, high rate of trainee participation, low rates of complications, and significant increase in procedural charges over 5 years. Wider adoption of this model has the potential to further improve patient procedural care and trainee education.

Keywords: Hospitalist procedure service; bedside procedures; medical education; procedural education; ultrasound guided procedures

MeSH terms

• Clinical Competence*
• Hospital Medicine / education*
• Hospital Medicine / methods
• Hospitals, Teaching / statistics & numerical data
• Humans
• Internal Medicine / education*
• Internal Medicine / methods
• Internship and Residency / methods*
• Patient Safety / statistics & numerical data*
• Quality of Health Care / standards*

Publication Types

• Journal Article