Display options
Share it on

Asian J Androl. 2021 Sep-Oct;23(5):501-509. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_93_20.

Testicular volume in infertile versus fertile white-European men: a case-control investigation in the real-life setting.

Asian journal of andrology

Luca Boeri, Paolo Capogrosso, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Walter Cazzaniga, Edoardo Pozzi, Federico Belladelli, Filippo Pederzoli, Massimo Alfano, Costantino Abbate, Emanuele Montanari, Luca Valsecchi, Enrico Papaleo, Paola Viganò, Patrizia Rovere-Querini, Suks Minhas, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Salonia

Affiliations

  1. Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20131, Italy.
  2. Department of Urology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Via Della Commenda 15, Milan 20122, Italy.
  3. University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20131, Italy.
  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20131, Italy.
  5. Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, Reproductive Sciences Laboratory, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20131, Italy.
  6. Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20131, Italy.
  7. Department of Urology, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, Hammersmith, London W6 8RF, UK.

PMID: 33723100 PMCID: PMC8451491 DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_93_20

Abstract

Testicular volume (TV) is considered a good clinical marker of hormonal and spermatogenic function. Accurate reference values for TV measures in infertile and fertile men are lacking. We aimed to assess references values for TV in white-European infertile men and fertile controls. We analyzed clinical and laboratory data from 1940 (95.0%) infertile men and 102 (5.0%) fertile controls. Groups were matched by age using propensity score weighting. TV was assessed using a Prader orchidometer (PO). Circulating hormones and semen parameters were investigated in every male. Descriptive statistics, Spearman's correlation, and logistic regression models tested potential associations between PO-estimated TV values and clinical variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to find TV value cutoffs for oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) and nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) status in infertile men. The median testicular volume was smaller in infertile than that of fertile men (15.0 ml vs 22.5 ml; P < 0.001). TV positively correlated with total testosterone, sperm concentration, and progressive sperm motility (all P ≤ 0.001) in infertile men. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, infertile status (P < 0.001) and the presence of left varicocele (P < 0.001) were associated with TV < 15 ml. Testicular volume thresholds of 15 ml and 12 ml had a good predictive ability for detecting OAT and NOA status, respectively. In conclusion, infertile men have smaller testicular volume than fertile controls. TV positively correlated with total testosterone, sperm concentration, and progressive motility in infertile men, which was not the case in the age-matched fertile counterparts.

Keywords: Prader; hypogonadism; male infertility; orchidometer; semen analysis; testicular volume

Conflict of interest statement

None

References

  1. Andrology. 2017 May;5(3):505-510 - PubMed
  2. Hum Reprod Update. 2010 May-Jun;16(3):231-45 - PubMed
  3. Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1432-42 - PubMed
  4. Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):920-923 - PubMed
  5. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83 - PubMed
  6. Hum Reprod. 2002 Aug;17(8):2199-208 - PubMed
  7. Asian J Androl. 2008 Mar;10(2):319-24 - PubMed
  8. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 1998 Jan-Feb;43(1):40-7 - PubMed
  9. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Mar;210(3):543-548 - PubMed
  10. Eur Urol. 1993;24(2):231-8 - PubMed
  11. Fertil Steril. 2015 Nov;104(5):1099-103.e1-3 - PubMed
  12. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Jun;95(6):2536-59 - PubMed
  13. Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Jul 15;6(4):791-800 - PubMed
  14. Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Jan-Feb;21(1):56-83 - PubMed
  15. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020 Jul;26(4):271-276 - PubMed
  16. Urology. 2010 Jun;75(6):1318-23 - PubMed
  17. J Sex Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):2761-73 - PubMed
  18. J Urol. 1987 Mar;137(3):416-9 - PubMed
  19. Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Jan 1;159(1):49-58 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Apr;95(4):1810-8 - PubMed
  21. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 May 30;5(1):38 - PubMed
  22. Asian J Androl. 2014 May-Jun;16(3):493-7 - PubMed
  23. Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):796-808 - PubMed
  24. Int J Androl. 1989 Dec;12(6):395-403 - PubMed
  25. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Jan;47(1):186-190 - PubMed
  26. Ultraschall Med. 2013 Aug;34(4):349-54 - PubMed
  27. Andrologia. 2018 Apr;50(3): - PubMed
  28. Hum Reprod. 2015 Dec;30(12):2713-24 - PubMed
  29. J Sex Med. 2012 Nov;9(11):2785-94 - PubMed
  30. Radiographics. 2017 May-Jun;37(3):837-854 - PubMed
  31. Andrology. 2020 Sep;8(5):1005-1020 - PubMed
  32. Ultrasonography. 2020 Oct;39(4):350-355 - PubMed

Publication Types