Display options
Share it on

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun;36(6):1553-1560. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06696-7. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

"This happens all the time": a Qualitative Study of General Internists' Experiences with Discriminatory Patients.

Journal of general internal medicine

Amarette Filut, Lacey Alexander, Alexis Ray, Kristen Pecanac, Molly Carnes

Affiliations

  1. Center for Women's Health Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  2. School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
  3. Departments of Medicine, Psychiatry, and Industrial Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. [email protected].
  4. Center for Women's Health Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. [email protected].
  5. Departments of Medicine, Psychiatry, and Industrial Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 33782894 PMCID: PMC8007052 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06696-7

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Workplace discrimination negatively affects physicians of color personally and professionally. Although the occurrence of discrimination from patients has been visible in social media, popular press, and personal essays, scant research exists on patients as a source of discrimination directed at physicians of color.

OBJECTIVE: To explore practicing general internists' experiences observing or interacting with patients exhibiting discriminatory behavior directed at physicians of color.

DESIGN: A qualitative study with in-depth, semi-structured, one-on-one telephone interviews conducted and recorded between May and September 2019.

PARTICIPANTS: A purposive sample of 24 general internists practicing at 12 academic health centers in the USA: 14 self-identified as White and 10 as a physician of color, which included Asian, Black, Native American, and self-identified other race.

APPROACH: Four coders analyzed the transcribed and verified interview text; thematic analysis was used to inductively identify cohesive themes and subthemes.

KEY RESULTS: Analyses revealed four major themes: (1) assumption that a legitimate doctor is White, male, and able-bodied; (2) legacy of the Black experience; (3) working through the struggle of discrimination; and (4) ethical dilemma of providing care to discriminatory patients. In addition to discrimination from patients based on a physician's race or ethnicity, participants described experiencing or observing discrimination based on a physician's gender and disability status. Participants generally expressed a need for greater support from colleagues and more guidance from institutional policies.

CONCLUSIONS: General internists practicing in academic settings reported observing or experiencing discrimination from patients based on the physician's race, ethnicity, gender (or their intersection), and disability status and the ethical dilemma of providing care to such patients. These results contribute to growing evidence of the need for institutions to better support an increasingly diverse physician workforce with policies and specific guidance to help physicians respond to discrimination from patients while still providing quality care.

Keywords: academic medicine; discrimination; physician-patient interaction; qualitative research

References

  1. AAMC. Diversity in Medicine: Facts and Figures 2019: AAMC; 2019. - PubMed
  2. QuickFacts United States, Population estimates, July 1, 2019 (V2019). United States Census Bureau.; 2019. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219 . Accessed November 3, 2020. - PubMed
  3. Murphy B. How IMGs have changed the face of American medicine. 2020; https://www.ama-assn.org/education/international-medical-education/how-imgs-have-changed-face-american-medicine . - PubMed
  4. AAMC. Underrepresented in Medicine Definition. 2004. https://www.aamc.org/what-we-do/mission-areas/diversity-inclusion/underrepresented-in-medicine . - PubMed
  5. Filut A, Alvarez M, Carnes M. Discrimination toward physicians of color: A systematic review. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020; 112(2): 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2020.02.008 . - PubMed
  6. Padela AI, Adam H, Ahmad M, Hosseinian Z, Curlin F. Religious identity and workplace discrimination: A national survey of American Muslim physicians. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2016;7(3):149-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2015.1111271 . - PubMed
  7. Bhatt W. The little brown woman: gender discrimination in American medicine. Gender Soc. 2013;27(5):659-680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213491140 . - PubMed
  8. Chen PGC, Nunez-Smith M, Bernheim SM, Berg D, Gozu A, Curry LA. Professional experiences of international medical graduates practicing primary care in the United States. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(9):947-953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1401-2 . - PubMed
  9. Chen PG-C, Curry LA, Bernheim SM, Berg D, Gozu A, Nunez-Smith M. Professional challenges of non-US-born international medical graduates and recommendations for support during residency training. Acad Med. 2011;86(11):1383. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e31823035e1 . - PubMed
  10. Hassouneh D, Lutz KF, Beckett AK, Junkins Jr EP, Horton LL. The experiences of underrepresented minority faculty in schools of medicine. Med Educ Online. 2014;19(1):24768. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v19.24768 . - PubMed
  11. Nunez-Smith M, Pilgrim N, Wynia M, et al. Race/ethnicity and workplace discrimination: results of a national survey of physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(11):1198-1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1103-9 . - PubMed
  12. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 . - PubMed
  13. Morse JM. What’s wrong with random selection?: Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks; 1998. - PubMed
  14. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y . - PubMed
  15. United States Census Bureau. Census Regions and Divisions of the United States. https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf . - PubMed
  16. AAMC. AAMC Medical School Members. 2018; https://members.aamc.org/eweb/DynamicPage.aspx?site=AAMC&webcode=AAMCOrgSearchResult&orgtype=Medical%20School . - PubMed
  17. Kaatz A, Magua W, Zimmerman DR, Carnes M. A quantitative linguistic analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 application critiques from investigators at one institution. Acad Med. 2015;90(1):69-75. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000442 . - PubMed
  18. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions, Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998. - PubMed
  19. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 . - PubMed
  20. Braun V, Clarke V. APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Cooper H, Thematic analysis. 2012;2. - PubMed
  21. NVivo qualitative data analysis Software [computer program]. Version Version 102014. - PubMed
  22. Tobin GA, Begley CM. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(4):388-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x . - PubMed
  23. Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1802-1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870 . - PubMed
  24. Choo ESH. 1/ We’ve got a lot of white nationalists in Oregon. So a few times a year, a patient in the ER refuses treatment from me because of my race. 2017. - PubMed
  25. Caudle DJ. I have had patients refuse to see me because of my race as well. It’s astonishing - but happens. 2017. - PubMed
  26. Yang Y. 1/ Today’s #MedEdMethodsMonday reviews strategies for responding as a bystander to #microagressions and #bias from patients. Have you seen a patient make a #sexist, #racist, ***ist comment towards a learner or peer? 2020. - PubMed
  27. Reddy S. How doctors deal with racist patients. The Wall Street Journal. 2018. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-doctors-deal-with-racist-patients-1516633710 . - PubMed
  28. Novick DR. Racist patients often leave doctors at a loss. The Washington Post. 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/racist-patients-often-leave-doctors-at-a-loss/2017/10/19/9e9a2c46-9d55-11e7-9c8d-cf053ff30921_story.html?utm_term=.ad2cd993f3a4 . - PubMed
  29. Poole KG Jr. Patient-experience data and bias - What ratings don’t tell us. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(9):801-803. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1813418 . - PubMed
  30. Williams M. Sick and tired. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(3):568-570. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003117 . - PubMed
  31. Jagsi R. A piece of my mind. How deep the bias. JAMA. 2008;299(3):259-260. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.3.259 . - PubMed
  32. Olayiwola JN. Racism in medicine: Shifting the power. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14(3):267-269. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1932 . - PubMed
  33. Wheeler M, de Bourmont S, Paul-Emile K, et al. Physician and trainee experiences with patient bias. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(12):1678-1685. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4122 . - PubMed
  34. Sue DW, Capodilupo CM, Torino GC, et al. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice. Am Psychol. 2007;62(4):271-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.62.4.271 . - PubMed
  35. Fine ES, Bell J, Fabian C, Carnes M; Neimeko CJ, Romero M. Teaching scademics about microaggressions: A workshop model adaptable to various audiences. presented at: Understanding Interventions 2018; Baltimore, MD. - PubMed
  36. Cheryan S. Understanding the paradox in math-related fields: Why do some gender gaps remain while others do not? Sex Roles. 2012;66(3-4):184-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0060-z . - PubMed
  37. Pololi L, Cooper L, Carr P, Cooper LA. Race, disadvantage and faculty experiences in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(12):1363-1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1478-7 . - PubMed
  38. Montenegro RE. My name is not “Interpreter”. JAMA. 2016;315(19):2071-2072. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2976 . - PubMed
  39. Filut A, Carnes M. Will losing black physicians be a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic? Acad Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003651 . - PubMed
  40. American Medical Association. AMA code of medical ethics: American Medical Association; 2016. - PubMed
  41. Warsame RM, Hayes SN. Mayo Clinic’s 5-Step Policy for Responding to Bias Incidents. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(6):521-529. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2019.521 . - PubMed
  42. Mello MM, Jagsi R. Standing up against gender bias and harassment — A matter of professional ethics. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(15):1385-1387. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1915351 . - PubMed
  43. Goldenberg MN, Cyrus KD, Wilkins KM. ERASE: a new framework for faculty to manage patient mistreatment of trainees. Acad Psychiatry. 2019;43(4):396-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-1011-6 . - PubMed
  44. Wilkins KM, Goldenberg MN, Cyrus KD. ERASE-ing patient mistreatment of trainees: Faculty workshop. MedEdPORTAL. 2019;15:10865. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10865 . - PubMed
  45. Sue DW, Alsaidi S, Awad MN, Glaeser E, Calle CZ, Mendez N. Disarming racial microaggressions: Microintervention strategies for targets, White allies, and bystanders. Am Psychol. 2019;74(1):128-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000296 . - PubMed
  46. Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci. 1994;5(1):14-37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 . - PubMed
  47. Carnes M, Devine PG, Isaac C, et al. Promoting institutional change through bias literacy. J Divers High. 2012;5(2):63-77. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028128 . - PubMed
  48. Carnes M, Devine PG, Baier Manwell L, et al. The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Acad Med. 2015;90(2):221-230. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000552 . - PubMed
  49. Carnes M, Fine E, Sheridan J. Promises and pitfalls of diversity statements: proceed with caution. Acad Med. 2019;94(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002388 . - PubMed
  50. Campbell MR, Brauer M. Incorporating Social-Marketing Insights Into Prejudice Research: Advancing Theory and Demonstrating Real-World Applications Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619896622 . - PubMed
  51. Tankard ME, Paluck EL. Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2016;10(1):181-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12022 . - PubMed
  52. Carnes M. The American College of Physicians is working hard to achieve gender equity, and everyone will benefit. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(10):741-743. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0837 . - PubMed
  53. Carnes M, Handelsman J, Sheridan J. Diversity in academic medicine: the stages of change model. J Womens Health. 2005;14(6):471-475. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2005.14.471 . - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support