Display options
Share it on

Neurobiol Stress. 2021 Apr 09;14:100323. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100323. eCollection 2021 May.

Blood and affective markers of stress in Elite Airmen during a preparatory training course: A pilot study.

Neurobiology of stress

S T Jenz, C D Goodyear, P R TSgt Graves, S Goldstein, M R Shia, E E Redei

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
  2. lnfoscitex Corporation, 4027 Colonel Glenn Highway, Suite 210, Dayton, OH, 45431, USA.
  3. Air Force Research Laboratory, 711th Human Performance Wing, Airman Systems Directorate, 2510 Fifth Street, Wright Patterson AFB, OH, 45433, USA.
  4. Air Force Research Laboratory, Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, 2977 Hobson Way, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 45433, USA.

PMID: 33912629 PMCID: PMC8066699 DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100323

Abstract

In highly stressful environments, individuals with diverging stress-reactivity can perform differently. Identification of blood markers of stress-reactivity is of major significance to help human performance during stress. Candidate transcripts were identified between stressed and non-stressed strains of rats' blood and brain, and overlapping significant differentially expressed genes were selected. Serum levels of human orthologues of these proteins, in lieu of blood RNA, in addition to classic stress and general clinical markers, were measured in 33 Battlefield Airmen undergoing a 52 day long preparatory training course before their course of initial entry (COIE). Blood samples and factors of affective state, negative valence "Threat" and positive valence "Challenge", were obtained five times across different days of training which included either routine physical exercise or prolonged and intense physical and mental training. During training, levels of chloride (Cl), dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEA-S), creatinine kinase (CK), and total carbon dioxide (TCO2) differed between airmen who subsequently graduated from their COIE and those who did not. Time dependent changes of serum TCO2 and neuropeptide Y (NPY), as well as the affective factor Challenge differed by future graduation status throughout the training. Serum levels of parvin beta (PARVB) correlated with the affective factor Threat, while those of NPY, testosterone, coactosin like F-actin binding protein 1 (COTL1) and C-reactive protein (CRP) correlated with factor Challenge during the extended, intensive periods of training, consistently. These pilot data suggest that the identified panel of blood markers can measure stress responsiveness, which has the potential to advance individualized stress-management strategies.

© 2021 The Authors.

Keywords: Affective measures; Battlefield airmen; Preparatory training; Serum stress markers; Stress-severity

Conflict of interest statement

None.

References

  1. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 1;166(3):729-35 - PubMed
  2. Mol Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;18(6):646-55 - PubMed
  3. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2010 Sep;70(5):374-82 - PubMed
  4. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Sep;33(9):2481-2487 - PubMed
  5. Mol Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;17(1):49-61 - PubMed
  6. Mil Med. 2011 Sep;176(9):991-7 - PubMed
  7. Trends Mol Med. 2018 Feb;24(2):173-186 - PubMed
  8. J Immunol Methods. 2012 Mar 30;377(1-2):62-5 - PubMed
  9. Stress. 2012 Jan;15(1):85-96 - PubMed
  10. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Sep;38(9):1596-606 - PubMed
  11. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018 Feb 1;89(2):99-107 - PubMed
  12. Atherosclerosis. 2007 Jul;193(1):196-203 - PubMed
  13. Ann Behav Med. 2016 Apr;50(2):210-36 - PubMed
  14. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Oct;38(10):2099-108 - PubMed
  15. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jun;10(6):446-57 - PubMed
  16. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Apr 1;59(7):660-3 - PubMed
  17. Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2017 Feb 1;1: - PubMed
  18. BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 12;7(10):e016085 - PubMed
  19. Physiol Behav. 2016 Oct 15;165:86-97 - PubMed
  20. Neuroscience. 2020 Sep 15;444:76-91 - PubMed
  21. Mil Med. 2016 Sep;181(9):1165 - PubMed
  22. J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Nov;20 Suppl 4:S98-S103 - PubMed
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 29;103(35):13150-5 - PubMed
  24. Psychiatry Res. 2018 May;263:48-53 - PubMed
  25. Nature. 2008 Apr 24;452(7190):997-1001 - PubMed
  26. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017 Dec 1;145:1-11 - PubMed
  27. Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Dec 18;2:587789 - PubMed
  28. Transl Psychiatry. 2014 Jul 22;4:e413 - PubMed
  29. J Trauma Stress. 2018 Feb;31(1):89-101 - PubMed
  30. Mol Diagn Ther. 2013 Jun;17(3):147-64 - PubMed
  31. Compr Physiol. 2016 Mar 15;6(2):603-21 - PubMed
  32. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Apr;60(1):88-94 - PubMed
  33. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jan;37(2):350-63 - PubMed
  34. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;61(8):819-25 - PubMed
  35. Nature. 2014 Feb 13;506(7487):150-2 - PubMed
  36. Physiol Genomics. 2006 Nov 27;27(3):362-9 - PubMed
  37. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Jun;85(6):2203-14 - PubMed
  38. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2012 Jul;32(5):645-59 - PubMed
  39. Biol Psychiatry. 2000 May 15;47(10):902-9 - PubMed
  40. Eur Heart J. 1997 May;18(5):858-65 - PubMed
  41. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2019 Aug 14;31:e18 - PubMed
  42. Endocr Connect. 2017 Oct;6(7):500-509 - PubMed
  43. Talanta. 2002 Jul 19;57(6):1205-10 - PubMed
  44. BMC Endocr Disord. 2009 Jun 21;9:16 - PubMed
  45. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2015 Sep;30(3):371-80 - PubMed
  46. J Sports Sci. 2005 Aug;23(8):825-34 - PubMed
  47. Anaesthesia. 2012 Oct;67(10):1146-51 - PubMed
  48. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Oct;31(10):2920-2937 - PubMed
  49. Epidemiology. 1990 Jan;1(1):43-6 - PubMed
  50. Res Nurs Health. 1990 Aug;13(4):227-36 - PubMed
  51. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Jan;32(1):209-15 - PubMed
  52. Sports Med. 2014 Feb;44(2):211-21 - PubMed
  53. Neuropeptides. 2004 Aug;38(4):213-24 - PubMed
  54. Physiol Rep. 2018 Sep;6(17):e13850 - PubMed
  55. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Mar;74(Pt B):310-320 - PubMed

Publication Types