Display options
Share it on

Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2021 Sep 02;6:239-243. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2021.08.001. eCollection 2021.

Normative reference values for the dorsal sural nerve derived from a large multicenter cohort.

Clinical neurophysiology practice

Thomas Krøigård, Sandra S Gylfadottir, Mustapha Itani, Karolina S Khan, Henning Andersen, Søren H Sindrup, Troels S Jensen, Kjeld V Andersen, Hatice Tankisi, Sándor Beniczky, Alexander Gramm Kristensen

Affiliations

  1. Research Unit for Neurology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  2. University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  3. Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  4. Danish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  5. Aleris-Hamlet Hospital, Søborg, Denmark.
  6. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  7. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Danish Epilepsy Centre (Member of the ERN EpiCARE), Dianalund, Denmark.

PMID: 34604609 PMCID: PMC8473014 DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2021.08.001

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Dorsal sural nerve conduction studies (NCS) may increase the sensitivity for the diagnosis of polyneuropathy, but clinical use is limited by a lack of reliable normative reference values in all age-groups. The aim of our study was to develop reference values for the dorsal sural nerve, based on a large multicenter cohort of healthy subjects.

METHODS: Bilateral antidromic NCS were performed using standard surface electrodes in 229 healthy subjects (aged 21-80 years; median: 54 years). We assessed the normality of data distribution for amplitudes and conduction velocity (CV) and for their logarithmic (ln) transformation. The effects of age and height were determined using linear regression analysis.

RESULTS: Sensory potentials were present in all subjects. Logarithmically transformed data were normally distributed. Age

CONCLUSIONS: Dorsal sural nerve NCS are robust and have well defined normative limits.

SIGNIFICANCE: The findings provide a basis for more sensitive NCS in clinical practice and future studies of the diagnostic accuracy of NCS in polyneuropathy.

© 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Keywords: Diagnosis; Dorsal sural nerve; Nerve conduction studies; Polyneuropathy; Reference values

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Neurol Sci. 2015 Jun;36(6):883-8 - PubMed
  2. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;31(1):5-20 - PubMed
  3. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Apr;119(4):880-5 - PubMed
  4. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Aug;33(4):346-9 - PubMed
  5. Eur J Neurol. 2020 Dec;27(12):2575-2585 - PubMed
  6. J Neurol. 2008 Aug;255(8):1127-35 - PubMed
  7. Muscle Nerve. 2012 Dec;46(6):895-8 - PubMed
  8. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2019 Nov 18;4:214-222 - PubMed
  9. Muscle Nerve. 2005 Mar;31(3):386-9 - PubMed
  10. Neurology. 2005 Jan 25;64(2):199-207 - PubMed
  11. Muscle Nerve. 2001 Jun;24(6):817-20 - PubMed
  12. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep;128(9):1590-1595 - PubMed
  13. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2021 Mar;26(1):55-65 - PubMed
  14. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Feb;127(2):1741-1743 - PubMed
  15. Muscle Nerve. 2017 Sep;56(3):458-462 - PubMed
  16. Diabetes Care. 2010 Oct;33(10):2285-93 - PubMed

Publication Types