Display options
Share it on

Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 13;15:4097-4108. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S325618. eCollection 2021.

Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Patients with Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema in the Asia-Pacific Region.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)

Wenbin Wei, Youxin Chen, Bojie Hu, Mingwei Zhao, Mei Han, Hong Dai, Harvey S Uy, Michelle Y Chen, Kate Wang, Jenny Jiao, Jean Lou, Xiao-Yan Li

Affiliations

  1. Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  2. Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  3. Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
  4. Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  5. Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
  6. Beijing Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
  7. Peregrine Eye and Laser Institute, Makati City, Philippines.
  8. Allergan, an AbbVie company, Irvine, CA, USA.

PMID: 34675477 PMCID: PMC8520964 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S325618

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (DEX) compared with laser photocoagulation in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: This Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, efficacy evaluator-masked, parallel-group, 12-month clinical study enrolled adults in China and the Philippines with reduced visual acuity secondary to fovea-involved DME in the study eye. Participants were randomized 1:1 to study eye treatment with laser photocoagulation every 3 months as needed (n = 139) or DEX every 5 months (n = 145). The main efficacy measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and leakage area. The primary endpoint was the average change in BCVA from baseline over 12 months (area-under-the-curve method). Preplanned subgroup analyses evaluated outcomes in Chinese patients.

RESULTS: Mean average change in BCVA from baseline during the study (letters) was 4.3 with DEX (n = 145) versus 1.4 with laser (n = 127) overall (

CONCLUSION: DEX administered every 5 months provided significantly greater improvement in BCVA, CRT, and total leakage area compared with laser treatment. DEX demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, consistent with an intraocular corticosteroid, and similar to that reported in completed global registration studies.

© 2021 Wei et al.

Keywords: central retinal thickness; corticosteroid; dexamethasone; diabetic retinopathy; drug delivery device; laser photocoagulation; macular edema; randomized controlled trial; visual acuity

Conflict of interest statement

Wenbin Wei, Youxin Chen, Bojie Hu, Mingwei Zhao, Mei Han, and Hong Dai have no financial relationships to disclose. Harvey S Uy has received research funding from and is a consultant for Allergan (an

References

  1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Dec;103(12):1796-806 - PubMed
  2. Retina. 2018 Dec;38(12):2293-2300 - PubMed
  3. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2014 Mar;10(2):100-12 - PubMed
  4. Acta Diabetol. 2019 Dec;56(12):1341-1350 - PubMed
  5. Ophthalmology. 2014 Oct;121(10):1904-14 - PubMed
  6. Diabetes Care. 2012 Mar;35(3):556-64 - PubMed
  7. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 30;7(8):e015473 - PubMed
  8. Ophthalmology. 2011 Apr;118(4):615-25 - PubMed
  9. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2011 Sep;30(5):343-58 - PubMed
  10. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;255(3):463-473 - PubMed
  11. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017 Apr 1;48(4):291-301 - PubMed
  12. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2016 Fall;5(3):104-111 - PubMed
  13. Ophthalmologica. 2008;222(1):32-6 - PubMed
  14. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan;256(1):59-69 - PubMed
  15. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 1;134(8):888-96 - PubMed
  16. Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1447-9, 1449.e1-10 - PubMed
  17. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018 Jun 1;49(6):425-435 - PubMed
  18. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 May 24;10:939-46 - PubMed
  19. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 May;51(5):2644-7 - PubMed
  20. Eye (Lond). 2021 Mar;35(3):777-785 - PubMed
  21. Eye Vis (Lond). 2015 Sep 30;2:17 - PubMed
  22. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 May 21;18(1):121 - PubMed
  23. Immunotherapy. 2011 May;3(5):609-28 - PubMed
  24. Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1134-1146.e3 - PubMed
  25. Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):789-801 - PubMed
  26. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Jan 1;59(1):1-12 - PubMed
  27. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;128:40-50 - PubMed
  28. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;23(4):209-22 - PubMed
  29. Ophthalmology. 1991 May;98(5 Suppl):766-85 - PubMed
  30. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 06;12:2519-2534 - PubMed
  31. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 May;31(3):1135-1145 - PubMed
  32. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;130(9):1153-61 - PubMed
  33. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014 May;15(7):953-9 - PubMed
  34. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;191:83-91 - PubMed
  35. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 May 13;13:829-840 - PubMed
  36. JAMA. 2013 Sep 4;310(9):948-59 - PubMed
  37. Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2247-54 - PubMed
  38. Ophthalmology. 2014 Dec;121(12):2473-81 - PubMed
  39. Ophthalmology. 2020 Mar;127(3):377-393 - PubMed
  40. Ophthalmology. 2013 Sep;120(9):1843-51 - PubMed
  41. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan 1;136(1):29-38 - PubMed
  42. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 16;10:CD007419 - PubMed

Publication Types