Display options
Share it on

Eur J Nutr. 2021 Nov 08; doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02731-9. Epub 2021 Nov 08.

Effect of maternal dietary niacin intake on congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

European journal of nutrition

Shanika Palawaththa, Rakibul M Islam, Dragan Illic, Kate Rabel, Marie Lee, Lorena Romero, Xing Yu Leung, Md Nazmul Karim

Affiliations

  1. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  2. The Alfred Hospital, The Ian Potter Library, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
  3. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. [email protected].

PMID: 34748060 DOI: 10.1007/s00394-021-02731-9

Abstract

PURPOSE: The significance of niacin in embryonic development has clinical implications in the counseling of pregnant women and may be used to inform nutrition recommendations. This study, therefore, aims to review the associations between maternal periconceptional niacin intake and congenital anomalies.

METHODS: A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, AMED, CENTRAL, Emcare, EMBASE, Maternity & Infant Care and Google Scholar was conducted between inception and 30 September 2020. Medical subject heading terms included "nicotinic acids" and related metabolites, "congenital anomalies" and specific types of congenital anomalies. Included studies reported the association between maternal niacin intake and congenital anomalies in their offspring and reported the measure of association. Studies involved solely the women with co-morbidities, animal, in vitro and qualitative studies were excluded. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A random effects-restricted maximum likelihood model was used to obtain summary estimates, and multivariable meta-regression model was used to adjust study-level covariates.

RESULTS: Of 21,908 retrieved citations, 14 case-control studies including 35,743 women met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies were conducted in the U.S, three in Netherlands and one in South Africa. The meta-analysis showed that expectant mothers with an insufficient niacin intake were significantly more likely to have babies with congenital abnormalities (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.24) compared to mothers with adequate niacin intake. A similar association between niacin deficiency and congenital anomalies was observed (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.26) when sensitivity analysis was conducted by quality of the included studies. Meta-regression showed neither statistically significant impact of study size (p = 0.859) nor time of niacin assessment (p = 0.127). The overall quality of evidence used is high-thirteen studies achieved a rating of six or seven stars out of a possible nine based on the NOS.

CONCLUSION: Inadequate maternal niacin intake is associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring. These findings may have implications in dietary counseling and use of niacin supplementation during pregnancy.

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Keywords: Birth defect; Congenital anomaly; NAD; Niacin; Pregnancy outcome; Vitamin B3

References

  1. World Health Organization (2010) Sixty-third World Health Assembly: Resolutions and Decisions. WHO Press - PubMed
  2. Carmichael SL (2014) Birth defects epidemiology. Eur J Med Genet 57:355–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.03.002 - PubMed
  3. Christianson A, Howson CP, Modell B (2005) March of Dimes: global report on birth defects, the hidden toll of dying and disabled children. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation - PubMed
  4. Perry M, Mulcahy H, DeFranco E (2017) Influence of periconception smoking behavior on birth defect risk. Obstet Gynecol 129:1S-2S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.029 - PubMed
  5. Yang J, Qiu H, Qu P, Zhang R, Zeng L, Yan H (2015) Prenatal alcohol exposure and congenital heart defects: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10:e0130681. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130681 - PubMed
  6. Carstairs SD (2016) Ondansetron use in pregnancy and birth defects. Obstet Gynecol 127:878–883. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001388 - PubMed
  7. Feldkamp ML, Meyer RE, Krikov S, Botto LD (2010) Acetaminophen use in pregnancy and risk of birth defects. Obstet Gynecol 115:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c52616 - PubMed
  8. Kirkland JB, Meyer-Ficca ML (2018) Niacin. Adv Food Nutr Res 83:83–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2017.11.003 - PubMed
  9. Surjana D, Halliday GM, Damian DL (2010) Role of nicotinamide in DNA damage, mutagenesis, and DNA repair. J Nucleic Acids 2010:157591. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/157591 - PubMed
  10. Shi H, Enriquez A, Rapadas M, Martin EM, Wang R, Moreau J et al (2017) NAD deficiency, congenital malformations, and niacin supplementation. New Engl J Med 377:544–552. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1616361 - PubMed
  11. Feng Y, Paul IA, LeBlanc MH (2006) Nicotinamide reduces hypoxic ischemic brain injury in the newborn rat. Brain Res Bull 69:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.11.011 - PubMed
  12. Bogan KL, Brenner C (2008) Nicotinic acid, nicotinamide, and nicotinamide riboside: a molecular evaluation of NAD+ precursor vitamins in human nutrition. Annu Rev Nutr 28:115–130. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.28.061807.155443 - PubMed
  13. Sauve AA (2008) NAD+ and vitamin B3: from metabolism to therapies. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 324:883–893. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.107.120758 - PubMed
  14. de Figueiredo LF, Gossmann TI, Ziegler M, Schuster S (2011) Pathway analysis of NAD+ metabolism. BiochemJ 439:341–348. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20110320 - PubMed
  15. Duckworth S, Mistry HD, Chappell LC (2012) Vitamin supplements in pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol 14:175–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-4667.2012.00116.x - PubMed
  16. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 - PubMed
  17. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Tugwell P (2000) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Avilable from the web http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp . Accesed on 22 Oct 2020 - PubMed
  18. Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186 - PubMed
  19. Egger M, Smith GD (1998) Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ 316:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 - PubMed
  20. Shi L, Lin L (2019) The trim-and-fill method for publication bias: practical guidelines and recommendations based on a large database of meta-analyses. Medicine (Baltimore) 98:e15987. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015987 - PubMed
  21. Kancherla V, Romitti PA, Sun L, Carey JC, Burns TL, Siega-Riz AM et al (2014) Descriptive and risk factor analysis for choanal atresia: The National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2007. Eur J Med Genet 57:220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.02.010 - PubMed
  22. Feldkamp ML, Carmichael SL, Shaw GM, Panichello JD, Moore CA, Botto LD (2011) Maternal nutrition and gastroschisis: findings from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:404.e1-404.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.053 - PubMed
  23. Groenen PM, van Rooij IA, Peer PG, OckéZielhuisSteegers-Theunissen MCGARP (2004) Low maternal dietary intakes of iron, magnesium, and niacin are associated with spina bifida in the offspring. J Nutr 134:1516–1522. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.6.1516 - PubMed
  24. Krapels IP, Van Rooij IA, Ocké MC, Van Cleef BA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Steegers-Theunissen RP (2004) Maternal dietary B vitamin intake, other than folate, and the association with orofacial cleft in the offspring. Eur J Nutr 43:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-004-0433-y - PubMed
  25. Ma C, Shaw GM, Scheuerle AE, Canfield MA, Carmichael SL (2012) Association of microtia with maternal nutrition. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 94:1026–1032. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23053 - PubMed
  26. May PA, Hamrick KJ, Corbin KD, Hasken JM, Marais AS, Brooke LE et al (2014) Dietary intake, nutrition, and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Reprod Toxicol 46:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.02.002 - PubMed
  27. Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Laurent C, Rasmussen SA (2006) Maternal nutrient intakes and risk of orofacial clefts. Epidemiology 17:285–291. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000208348.30012.35 - PubMed
  28. Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Laurent C, Louik C, Finnell RH, Lammer EJ (2007) Nutrient intakes in women and risks of anophthalmia and microphthalmia in their offspring. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 79:708–713. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20398 - PubMed
  29. Smedts HP, Rakhshandehroo M, Verkleij-Hagoort AC, de Vries JH, Ottenkamp J, Steegers EA et al (2008) Maternal intake of fat, riboflavin and nicotinamide and the risk of having offspring with congenital heart defects. Eur J Nutr 47:357–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-008-0735-6 - PubMed
  30. Torfs CP, Lam PK, Schaffer DM, Brand RJ (1998) Association between mothers’ nutrient intake and their offspring’s risk of gastroschisis. Teratology 58:241–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199812)58:6%3c241::AID-TERA5%3e3.0.CO;2-R - PubMed
  31. Yang W, Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Rasmussen SA, Waller DK, Pober BR et al (2008) Nutrient intakes in women and congenital diaphragmatic hernia in their offspring. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 82:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20436 - PubMed
  32. Shaw GM, Todoroff K, Schaffer DM, Selvin S (1999) Periconceptional nutrient intake and risk for neural tube defect-affected pregnancies. Epidemiology 10:711–716 - PubMed
  33. Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Yang W, Lammer EJ (2010) Periconceptional nutrient intakes and risks of conotruncal heart defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 88:144–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20648 - PubMed
  34. Wallenstein MB, Shaw GM, Yang W, Carmichael SL (2013) Periconceptional nutrient intakes and risks of orofacial clefts in California. Pediatr Res 74:457–465. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2013.115 - PubMed
  35. Pitt DB, Samson PE (1961) Congenital malformations and maternal diet. Australas Ann Med 10:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.1961.10.4.268 - PubMed
  36. Ibrahim SA, Al-Halim OA, Samy MA, Mohamadin AM (2013) Maternal nutritional status and the risk of birth defects among Saudi women. Nutrafoods 12:81–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13749-012-0066-3 - PubMed
  37. Chandler AL, Hobbs CA, Mosley BS, Berry RJ, Canfield MA, Qi YP et al (2012) Neural tube defects and maternal intake of micronutrients related to one-carbon metabolism or antioxidant activity. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 94:864–874. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23068 - PubMed
  38. Cuny H, Rapadas M, Gereis J, Martin EM, Kirk RB, Shi H et al (2020) NAD deficiency due to environmental factors or gene–environment interactions causes congenital malformations and miscarriage in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:3738–3747. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916588117 - PubMed
  39. Preiss J, Handler P (1958) Biosynthesis of diphosphopyridine nucleotide: I. Identification of intermediates. J Biol Chem 233:488–492 - PubMed
  40. Satoh MS, Lindahl T (1992) Role of poly (ADP-ribose) formation in DNA repair. Nature 356:356–358. https://doi.org/10.1038/356356a0 - PubMed
  41. Helleday T, Petermann E, Lundin C, Hodgson B, Sharma RA (2008) DNA repair pathways as targets for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 8:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2342 - PubMed
  42. Miao YL, Williams CJ (2012) Calcium signaling in mammalian egg activation and embryo development: influence of subcellular localization. Mol Reprod Dev 79:742–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22078 - PubMed
  43. Nebel M, Schwoerer AP, Warszta D, Siebrands CC, Limbrock AC, Swarbrick JM et al (2013) Nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP)-mediated calcium signaling and arrhythmias in the heart evoked by β-adrenergic stimulation. J Biol Chem 288:16017–16030. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.441246 - PubMed
  44. Wang F, Nguyen M, Qin FX, Tong Q (2007) SIRT2 deacetylates FOXO3a in response to oxidative stress and caloric restriction. Aging Cell 6:505–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00304.x - PubMed
  45. Kawahara TL, Michishita E, Adler AS, Damian M, Berber E, Lin M et al (2009) SIRT6 links histone H3 lysine 9 deacetylation to NF-κB-dependent gene expression and organismal life span. Cell 136:62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.052 - PubMed
  46. Yeung F, Hoberg JE, Ramsey CS, Keller MD, Jones DR, Frye RA et al (2004) Modulation of NF-κB-dependent transcription and cell survival by the SIRT1 deacetylase. EMBO J 23:2369–2380. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600244 - PubMed
  47. Han MK, Song EK, Guo Y, Ou X, Mantel C, Broxmeyer HE (2008) SIRT1 regulates apoptosis and Nanog expression in mouse embryonic stem cells by controlling p53 subcellular localization. Cell Stem Cell 2:241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.002 - PubMed
  48. Barral A, Rollan I, Sanchez-Iranzo H, Jawaid W, Badia-Careaga C, Menchero S (2019) Nanog regulates Pou3f1 expression at the exit from pluripotency during gastrulation. Biol Open. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.046367 - PubMed
  49. Kafi M, Ashrafi M, Azari M, Jandarroodi B, Abouhamzeh B, Asl AR (2019) Niacin improves maturation and cryo-tolerance of bovine in vitro matured oocytes: an experimental study. Int J Reprod Biomed 17:621. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v17i9.5096 - PubMed
  50. Almubarak AM, Kim E, Yu IJ, Jeon Y (2021) Supplementation with Niacin during in vitro maturation improves the quality of porcine embryos. Theriogenology 169:36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.04.005 - PubMed
  51. Institute of Medicine (US) Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes and its Panel on Folate, Other B Vitamins, and Choline (1998) Dietary reference intakes for thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B - PubMed
  52. Block G, Woods M, Potosky A, Clifford C (1990) Validation of a self-administered diet history questionnaire using multiple diet records. J Clin Epidemiol 43:1327–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90099-b - PubMed
  53. Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Bain C, Witschi J et al (1985) Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 122:51–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114086 - PubMed
  54. Caan BJ, Slattery ML, Potter J, Quesenberry CP Jr, Coates AO, Schaffer DM (1998) Comparison of the Block and the Willett self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaires with an interviewer-administered dietary history. Am J Epidemiol 148:1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009598 - PubMed

Publication Types