Display options
Share it on

Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 16;11(1):22291. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01721-5.

Declining methane emissions and steady, high leakage rates observed over multiple years in a western US oil/gas production basin.

Scientific reports

John C Lin, Ryan Bares, Benjamin Fasoli, Maria Garcia, Erik Crosman, Seth Lyman

Affiliations

  1. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA. [email protected].
  2. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
  3. Division of Air Quality, Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Salt Lake City, USA.
  4. Department of Life, Earth and Environmental Sciences, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, USA.
  5. Bingham Research Center, Utah State University, Salt Lake City, USA.

PMID: 34785727 PMCID: PMC8595340 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01721-5

Abstract

Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, is the main component of natural gas. Previous research has identified considerable methane emissions associated with oil and gas production, but estimates of emission trends have been inconsistent, in part due to limited in-situ methane observations spanning multiple years in oil/gas production regions. Here we present a unique analysis of one of the longest-running datasets of in-situ methane observations from an oil/gas production region in Utah's Uinta Basin. The observations indicate Uinta methane emissions approximately halved between 2015 and 2020, along with declining gas production. As a percentage of gas production, however, emissions remained steady over the same years, at ~ 6-8%, among the highest in the U.S. Addressing methane leaks and recovering more of the economically valuable natural gas is critical, as the U.S. seeks to address climate change through aggressive greenhouse emission reductions.

© 2021. The Author(s).

References

  1. Science. 2014 Feb 14;343(6172):733-5 - PubMed
  2. Nature. 2014 Oct 16;514(7522):351-4 - PubMed
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 24;109(17):6435-40 - PubMed
  4. Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Dec 6;50(23):13123-13133 - PubMed
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 10;110(50):20018-22 - PubMed
  6. Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jan 6;49(1):641-8 - PubMed
  7. Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jan 6;49(1):633-40 - PubMed
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 29;110(44):17768-73 - PubMed
  9. Science. 2000 Apr 21;288(5465):500-3 - PubMed
  10. Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Feb 16;50(4):2099-107 - PubMed
  11. Science. 2018 Jul 13;361(6398):186-188 - PubMed
  12. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2017 Apr 27;122(8):4639-4653 - PubMed
  13. Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Nov 6;52(21):12915-12925 - PubMed
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 25;111(47):16694-9 - PubMed
  15. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 28;10(1):1379 - PubMed
  16. Sci Adv. 2020 Apr 22;6(17):eaaz5120 - PubMed
  17. Environ Sci Technol. 2016 May 3;50(9):4877-86 - PubMed
  18. Environ Sci Technol. 2014 May 6;48(9):4707-15 - PubMed
  19. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2017 Dec 27;122(24):13545-13572 - PubMed
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 16;: - PubMed
  21. Science. 2012 Jan 13;335(6065):183-9 - PubMed
  22. Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7781):180-184 - PubMed
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 14;103(11):3988-93 - PubMed
  24. Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Sep 1;49(17):10718-27 - PubMed
  25. Nat Commun. 2017 Jan 16;8:14012 - PubMed
  26. Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Dec 16;48(24):14508-15 - PubMed
  27. Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Aug 1;51(15):8832-8840 - PubMed
  28. Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 5;12(1):4715 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support