Display options
Share it on

Trends Cancer Res. 2008;4:1-13.

Cell-based Models for Discovery of Pharmacogenomic Markers of Anticancer Agent Toxicity.

Trends in cancer research

Wei Zhang, R Stephanie Huang, M Eileen Dolan

Affiliations

  1. Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

PMID: 21499559 PMCID: PMC3076057

Abstract

The field of pharmacogenomics is challenging because of the multigenic nature of drug response and toxicity. The candidate gene approach has been traditionally utilized to determine the contribution of genetic variation to a particular phenotype; however, the sequencing of the human genome and the genetic resource provided by the International HapMap Project has allowed researchers to perform genome-wide studies without a priori knowledge. Recent work has demonstrated the usefulness of cell-based models for pharmacogenomic discovery using the HapMap samples, which are a panel of well-genotyped, human lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) derived from 90 Utah residents with ancestry from northern and western Europe (CEU), 90 Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria (YRI), 45 Japanese in Tokyo, Japan (JPT) and 45 Han Chinese in Beijing, China (CHB). Using these cell-based models, investigators are able to study not only individual variation in drug response, but also population differences in drug response. Finally, besides single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and gene expression, these cell-based models can also be used to investigate other genetic (e.g. copy number variants, CNVs), epigenetic or environmental factors responsible for drug response.

References

  1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Aug 7;94(15):1160-7 - PubMed
  2. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Jul 7;91(13):1125-30 - PubMed
  3. Cancer Res. 2008 Sep 1;68(17):7050-8 - PubMed
  4. Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1299-320 - PubMed
  5. Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):928-33 - PubMed
  6. Science. 2001 Feb 16;291(5507):1304-51 - PubMed
  7. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007 Jan;6(1):31-6 - PubMed
  8. Hum Genet. 1999 Jan;104(1):10-4 - PubMed
  9. Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Mar;80(3):502-9 - PubMed
  10. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008 Sep;7(9):3038-46 - PubMed
  11. PLoS One. 2007 Apr 25;2(4):e396 - PubMed
  12. Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Oct 15;12 Spec No 2:R145-52 - PubMed
  13. Can J Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;45(10):917-22 - PubMed
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Mar 28;97(7):3473-8 - PubMed
  15. Genome Res. 2003 Sep;13(9):2092-100 - PubMed
  16. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Nov 21;145(10):749-57 - PubMed
  17. Am J Hum Genet. 2008 May;82(5):1039-50 - PubMed
  18. Drug Resist Updat. 2008 Jun;11(3):77-98 - PubMed
  19. Curr Drug Saf. 2007 Jan;2(1):79-87 - PubMed
  20. Bioinformation. 2008 Jan 11;2(6):238-9 - PubMed
  21. Drug Metab Rev. 2006;38(3):393-409 - PubMed
  22. Nat Genet. 2007 Jul;39(7):807-8; author reply 808-9 - PubMed
  23. Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Mar;82(3):631-40 - PubMed
  24. Anticancer Drugs. 2006 Feb;17(2):207-15 - PubMed
  25. Pharmacogenomics. 2008 May;9(5):489-92 - PubMed
  26. Nat Genet. 2007 Feb;39(2):226-31 - PubMed
  27. Nature. 2007 Oct 18;449(7164):913-8 - PubMed
  28. Genomics. 1990 Mar;6(3):575-7 - PubMed
  29. Neurology. 1984 Jun;34(6):808-11 - PubMed
  30. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Mar;66(3):979-88 - PubMed
  31. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 May;9(7):1109-19 - PubMed
  32. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Mar;81(3):328-45 - PubMed
  33. Ann Oncol. 2003 Mar;14(3):449-54 - PubMed
  34. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2003 Sep;1(9):517-8, 531 - PubMed
  35. Lancet. 1984 May 26;1(8387):1148-51 - PubMed
  36. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 29;94(9):4516-9 - PubMed
  37. Nat Genet. 2007 Oct;39(10):1217-24 - PubMed
  38. Oncogene. 2004 Apr 1;23(14):2531-9 - PubMed
  39. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2004 Jan;369(1):89-104 - PubMed
  40. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2008 Nov;2008(1):7-14 - PubMed
  41. Pharmacogenomics. 2007 Sep;8(9):1159-68 - PubMed
  42. Ther Drug Monit. 2004 Apr;26(2):236-40 - PubMed
  43. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;291:399-414 - PubMed
  44. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008 Apr;7(4):935-43 - PubMed
  45. Science. 2004 Jun 4;304(5676):1497-500 - PubMed
  46. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 5;104(23):9758-63 - PubMed
  47. Nature. 2007 Oct 18;449(7164):851-61 - PubMed
  48. Blood. 2006 Dec 1;108(12):3859-64 - PubMed
  49. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2005;70:419-26 - PubMed
  50. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000 Sep;38(9):841-52 - PubMed
  51. Curr Top Med Chem. 2004;4(13):1423-31 - PubMed
  52. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2002 Jul;1(2):139-50 - PubMed
  53. Nat Genet. 2004 Nov;36(11 Suppl):S28-33 - PubMed
  54. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 6;348(6):538-49 - PubMed
  55. Nat Genet. 2004 Sep;36(9):949-51 - PubMed
  56. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(3):253-85 - PubMed
  57. Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860-921 - PubMed
  58. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2008;2:15-23 - PubMed
  59. Cancer. 2001 Dec 1;92(11):2892-7 - PubMed
  60. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Aug 29;360(1460):1563-70 - PubMed
  61. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Jan;66(1):279-92 - PubMed
  62. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2129-39 - PubMed
  63. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Mar;81(3):321-2 - PubMed
  64. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Jul;62(1):35-46 - PubMed
  65. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;448:63-76 - PubMed
  66. Nat Genet. 2003 Mar;33(3):422-5 - PubMed
  67. Nature. 2003 Dec 18;426(6968):789-96 - PubMed
  68. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):5007-18 - PubMed
  69. Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):427-37 - PubMed
  70. Nature. 2006 Nov 23;444(7118):444-54 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support