Display options
Share it on

Transl Behav Med. 2014 Jun;4(2):209-19. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0257-0.

Quitting the "Cancer Tube": a qualitative examination of the process of indoor tanning cessation.

Translational behavioral medicine

Smita C Banerjee, Jennifer L Hay, Alan C Geller, Joshua J Gagne, A Lindsay Frazier

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022 USA.
  2. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA.
  3. Survey & Data Management Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA.
  4. Pediatrics, Dana-Farber Children's Cancer Care, Boston, MA USA.

PMID: 24904705 PMCID: PMC4041931 DOI: 10.1007/s13142-014-0257-0

Abstract

This study examined health belief model (HBM) relevant constructs in the context of indoor tanning cessation. Telephone interviews were conducted between December 2011 and April 2012 with participants drawn from the Growing Up Today Study (GUTS) population, specifically, former tanning bed users (N = 14, all females; mean age, 25.65 years) who reported frequent use in 2007, but had quit by 2010. Participants identified important motivations for quitting including health and financial reasons and the central role of family and friends in providing encouragement for indoor tanning cessation. However, participants also noted substantial barriers to maintaining indoor tanning quitting (e.g., social pressures to look good, tanning salon incentives). Participants' experience of withdrawal highlighted psychological factors more often than physical factors; some were open to resuming use in the future. The findings will be useful in intervention development to encourage cessation, the strengthening of policies to regulate the indoor tanning industry, as well as public health messaging to raise awareness of this prevalent, easily accessible cancer risk behavior.

Keywords: Health belief model; Indoor tanning; Qualitative research; Tanning cessation; Tanning quitting

References

  1. Health Educ Res. 2010 Feb;25(1):162-82 - PubMed
  2. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Aug;10(8):751-2 - PubMed
  3. Arch Dermatol. 2010 Apr;146(4):412-7 - PubMed
  4. Arch Dermatol. 2008 Apr;144(4):484-8 - PubMed
  5. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 May 11;61(18):323-6 - PubMed
  6. Arch Dermatol. 2012 Jul;148(7):855-7 - PubMed
  7. Pediatrics. 2003 Apr;111(4 Pt 1):836-43 - PubMed
  8. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Jun;19(6):1557-68 - PubMed
  9. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 May;5(5):388-96 - PubMed
  10. J Behav Med. 2010 Jun;33(3):181-90 - PubMed
  11. Cancer Causes Control. 2008 Sep;19(7):659-69 - PubMed
  12. Int J Dermatol. 2007 Dec;46(12):1253-7 - PubMed
  13. Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(3):168-74 - PubMed
  14. Arch Dermatol. 2008 Nov;144(11):1521-4 - PubMed
  15. Behav Med. 2012;38(3):74-82 - PubMed
  16. Am J Emerg Med. 1987 Sep;5(5):386-9 - PubMed
  17. Photochem Photobiol. 2008 Sep-Oct;84(5):1294-7 - PubMed
  18. J Behav Med. 2002 Aug;25(4):395-409 - PubMed
  19. Cancer. 2008 Dec 1;113(11):3257-66 - PubMed
  20. Health Psychol. 2005 Jul;24(4):358-63 - PubMed
  21. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Dec;53(6):1038-44 - PubMed
  22. Br J Cancer. 2000 May;82(9):1593-9 - PubMed
  23. J Cancer Educ. 1996 Summer;11(2):96-101 - PubMed
  24. Arch Dermatol. 2002 Oct;138(10):1311-5 - PubMed
  25. Skin Res Technol. 2011 Aug;17(3):309-13 - PubMed
  26. BMJ. 2012 Jul 24;345:e4757 - PubMed
  27. Int J Cosmet Sci. 1998 Aug;20(4):251-9 - PubMed
  28. BMJ. 2012 Oct 02;345:e5909 - PubMed
  29. Health Educ Res. 1999 Apr;14(2):155-66 - PubMed
  30. Cancer Manag Res. 2010 Oct 28;2:277-82 - PubMed
  31. BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1115-7 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support