Display options
Share it on

J Otol. 2013;8(1):63-71. doi: 10.1016/s1672-2930(13)50009-2.

Ototoxic Model of Oxaliplatin and Protection from Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide.

Journal of otology

Ding Dalian, Jiang Haiyan, Fu Yong, Li Yongqi, Richard Salvi, Shinichi Someya, Masaru Tanokura

Affiliations

  1. Center for Hearing and Deafness, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA ; Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Oriental Otolaryngology Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China ; Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China ; Department of Applied Biological Chemistry, University of Tokyo, Japan.
  2. Center for Hearing and Deafness, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA.
  3. The First Officiated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University.
  4. The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University.
  5. University of Florida, USA.
  6. Department of Applied Biological Chemistry, University of Tokyo, Japan.

PMID: 25419212 PMCID: PMC4240522 DOI: 10.1016/s1672-2930(13)50009-2

Abstract

Oxaliplatin, an anticancer drug commonly used to treat colorectal cancer and other tumors, has a number of serious side effects, most notably neuropathy and ototoxicity. To gain insights into its ototoxic profile, oxaliplatin was applied to rat cochlear organ cultures. Consistent with it neurotoxic propensity, oxaliplatin selectively damaged nerve fibers at a very low dose 1 μM. In contrast, the dose required to damage hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons was 50 fold higher (50 μM). Oxailiplatin-induced cochlear lesions initially increased with dose, but unexpectedly decreased at very high doses. This non-linear dose response could be related to depressed oxaliplatin uptake via active transport mechanisms. Previous studies have demonstrated that axonal degeneration involves biologically active processes which can be greatly attenuated by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+). To determine if NAD+ would protect spiral ganglion axons and the hair cells from oxaliplatin damage, cochlear cultures were treated with oxaliplatin alone at doses of 10 μM or 50 μM respectively as controls or combined with 20 mM NAD+. Treatment with 10 μM oxaliplatin for 48 hours resulted in minor damage to auditory nerve fibers, but spared cochlear hair cells. However, when cochlear cultures were treated with 10 μM oxaliplatin plus 20 mM NAD+, most auditory nerve fibers were intact. 50 μM oxaliplatin destroyed most of spiral ganglion neurons and cochlear hair cells with apoptotic characteristics of cell fragmentations. However, 50 μM oxaliplatin plus 20 mM NAD+ treatment greatly reduced neuronal degenerations and hair cell missing. The results suggested that NAD+ provides significant protection against oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity and ototoxicity, which may be due to its actions of antioxidant, antiapoptosis, and energy supply.

Keywords: apoptosis; copper transporter; nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; oxaliplatin

References

  1. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004 Dec;124(10 ):1131-5 - PubMed
  2. J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Feb;11(1):143-8 - PubMed
  3. Ann Oncol. 1996 Dec;7(10):1065-70 - PubMed
  4. J Biol Chem. 2007 Mar 2;282(9):6823-32 - PubMed
  5. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007 Aug;7(8):573-84 - PubMed
  6. Am J Otol. 1997 Sep;18(5):559-71 - PubMed
  7. Int J Audiol. 2010 Jan;49(1):30-43 - PubMed
  8. Science. 2004 Mar 26;303(5666):2011-5 - PubMed
  9. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007 May 1;73(9):1499-510 - PubMed
  10. Hear Res. 2011 Dec;282(1-2):196-203 - PubMed
  11. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2004;66(3):111-8 - PubMed
  12. Am J Pathol. 2005 Dec;167(6):1477-84 - PubMed
  13. Cancer. 2008 Dec 1;113(11):3069-74 - PubMed
  14. Cell. 2004 Feb 20;116(4):551-63 - PubMed
  15. Am J Pathol. 2010 Mar;176(3):1169-80 - PubMed
  16. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Mar;10(3):304 - PubMed
  17. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2000 Apr-Jun;18(2-3):259-70 - PubMed
  18. Brain Res Bull. 1995;38(6):595-604 - PubMed
  19. Ann Oncol. 2001 Sep;12(9):1195-203 - PubMed
  20. Cell Death Differ. 2007 Jun;14(6):1211-21 - PubMed
  21. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1996 Jun 15;786:135-51 - PubMed
  22. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 May;64(5):1282-8 - PubMed
  23. Drugs. 1991 Oct;42(4):569-605 - PubMed
  24. Hear Res. 2007 Apr;226(1-2):129-39 - PubMed
  25. Neurochem Res. 2003 Aug;28(8):1227-34 - PubMed
  26. Cell. 2001 Oct 19;107(2):137-48 - PubMed
  27. Trends Cell Biol. 2002 Sep;12(9):404-6 - PubMed
  28. Laryngoscope. 2003 Jun;113(6):994-9 - PubMed
  29. Am J Pathol. 2001 Nov;159(5):1889-94 - PubMed
  30. Biol Trace Elem Res. 1996 Oct-Nov;55(1-2):1-7 - PubMed
  31. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2012 Nov;295(11):1851-67 - PubMed
  32. Eur J Cancer. 2001 Dec;37(18):2457-63 - PubMed
  33. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 29;99(22):14298-302 - PubMed
  34. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005 Jan;53(1):13-23 - PubMed
  35. Kidney Int. 2006 Nov;70(10):1847-57 - PubMed
  36. Neurotoxicology. 2006 Dec;27(6):992-1002 - PubMed
  37. Br J Dermatol. 2009 Dec;161(6):1357-64 - PubMed
  38. Cell. 2001 Oct 19;107(2):149-59 - PubMed
  39. Br J Cancer. 2001 Oct 19;85(8):1219-25 - PubMed
  40. Neuroscience. 2010 Jun 16;168(1):288-99 - PubMed
  41. Hear Res. 2008 Feb;236(1-2):52-60 - PubMed
  42. J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 16;26(33):8484-91 - PubMed
  43. J Otol. 2012 Dec;7(2):92-101 - PubMed
  44. Carcinogenesis. 2009 Jan;30(1):101-5 - PubMed
  45. Audiol Neurootol. 1997 May-Jun;2(3):155-67 - PubMed
  46. Semin Oncol. 1995 Oct;22(5 Suppl 12):88-90 - PubMed
  47. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Sep;128(9):1026-30 - PubMed
  48. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2008;:754190 - PubMed
  49. Cancer Lett. 2006 Mar 8;234(1):34-9 - PubMed
  50. J Am Chem Soc. 2010 Jun 2;132(21):7429-35 - PubMed
  51. Hear Res. 2002 Feb;164(1-2):115-26 - PubMed
  52. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2003 Aug;30(3):219-25 - PubMed
  53. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 Nov 28;884:152-70 - PubMed
  54. J Neurooncol. 2004 Mar-Apr;67(1-2):65-73 - PubMed
  55. Neuroscience. 2003;120(1):191-205 - PubMed
  56. J Biol Chem. 2002 Feb 8;277(6):4380-7 - PubMed
  57. Life Sci. 2006 Dec 23;80(3):254-7 - PubMed
  58. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 1998 Feb;33(1):30-1 - PubMed
  59. Science. 2004 Aug 13;305(5686):1010-3 - PubMed
  60. Laryngoscope. 2004 Mar;114(3):538-42 - PubMed
  61. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 1999 Nov;13(11):510-2 - PubMed
  62. Hear Res. 2003 Dec;186(1-2):10-6 - PubMed
  63. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 17;106(46):19432-7 - PubMed
  64. Methods Enzymol. 2002;353:282-300 - PubMed
  65. Neurotoxicology. 2011 Mar;32(2):233-41 - PubMed
  66. Anticancer Drugs. 1993 Apr;4(2):149-62 - PubMed
  67. Shock. 2007 Feb;27(2):199-204 - PubMed
  68. FEBS Lett. 2004 Jan 2;556(1-3):281-6 - PubMed
  69. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Apr;38(2):98-100 - PubMed
  70. J Vasc Res. 2002 Mar-Apr;39(2):131-47 - PubMed
  71. Pharmacology. 2003 Nov;69(3):150-7 - PubMed
  72. J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 20;26(38):9794-804 - PubMed
  73. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1990;11(3):219-24 - PubMed
  74. Toxicol Sci. 1998 Dec;46(2):342-51 - PubMed
  75. Drugs. 2000;59 Suppl 4:19-27 - PubMed
  76. Mol Pharmacol. 2002 Nov;62(5):1154-9 - PubMed
  77. Biochem J. 2007 Feb 15;402(1):135-41 - PubMed
  78. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2001;55(3):387-406 - PubMed
  79. Neuroreport. 1998 Aug 3;9(11):2609-14 - PubMed
  80. J Cell Biol. 2005 Aug 1;170(3):349-55 - PubMed
  81. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1993 Dec;15(3):191-219 - PubMed
  82. Anticancer Drugs. 2000 Oct;11(9):731-5 - PubMed
  83. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2004 Mar;53(3):239-46 - PubMed
  84. Mol Pharmacol. 2008 Feb;73(2):461-8 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support