Display options
Share it on

J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Jul;9(7):390-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02629520.

The efficacy of intensive biopsychosocial teaching programs for residents: a review of the literature and guidelines for teaching.

Journal of general internal medicine

R C Smith, A A Marshall, S A Cohen-Cole

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing.

PMID: 7931749 DOI: 10.1007/BF02629520

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review research evaluations of intensive biopsychosocial training programs for nonpsychiatry residents, and determine whether this research showed sufficient rigor and consistent beneficial impact to allow initial research-based teaching guidelines.

DATA SOURCES: An English-language literature search used MEDLINE (1966-93), Psychological Abstracts (1967-93), and Educational Resource Information Clearinghouse (1966-93) as well as bibliographic reviews from prominent peer-reviewed articles and consultation with an expert.

STUDY SELECTION: From among several hundred articles about biopsychosocial training, only 12 studies met the selection criteria: at least 100 contact hours of training for nonpsychiatry residents and an evaluation of efficacy.

DATA EXTRACTION: The three authors independently assessed these 12 studies and made a consensus decision based on explicit criteria. Successful and unsuccessful programs were distinguished from among those classified as quasi-experimental or experimental to identify programs of sufficient rigor to meet the study objective; success was defined as learning beyond knowledge and residents' acceptance of teaching.

DATA SYNTHESIS: Four successful quasi-experimental or experimental programs showed the following uniquely beneficial features: 1) protected time for residents; 2) teaching that was required, structured, multidimensional, and balanced between learner-centered and teacher-centered approaches; 3) teaching methods that used normal as well as psychosocially disturbed patients, nonpsychiatrist teachers, and special teaching techniques; and 4) inclusion in the curriculum of interviewing, interpersonal skills, doctor-patient relationship, and patient education. Two unsuccessful quasi-experimental or experimental programs were unidimensional and unstructured, and used predominant or isolated teacher-centered approaches. Features found in both successful and unsuccessful programs were experiential teaching, psychiatrist and other mental health professional teachers, use of disturbed patients, training to manage patients' psychosocial problems, teaching directed toward knowledge acquisition, teaching about treatment, and university affiliation.

CONCLUSIONS: Four rigorously studied, successful programs showed a common pattern of intensive biopsychosocial teaching that produced, in aggregate, improvement in residents' knowledge, attitudes, skills, and self-awareness. Although there is need for more definitive research, these data are sufficiently compelling and consistent to provide initial, research-based teaching guidelines.

References

  1. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1983 Sep;5(3):157-69 - PubMed
  2. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215 - PubMed
  3. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Sep 15;115(6):470-7 - PubMed
  4. J Fam Pract. 1980 Jun;10(6):1017-23 - PubMed
  5. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1989 Mar;11(2):77-87 - PubMed
  6. J Med Educ. 1957 Dec;32(12):859-71 - PubMed
  7. J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Jul-Aug;5(4):347-54 - PubMed
  8. Psychosomatics. 1985 Mar;26(3):231-3, 237-8 - PubMed
  9. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1982 Sep;4(3):197-218 - PubMed
  10. Psychosomatics. 1988 Fall;29(4):392-7 - PubMed
  11. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1980 Dec;2(4):282-8 - PubMed
  12. Am J Psychiatry. 1980 May;137(5):535-44 - PubMed
  13. J Gen Intern Med. 1991 Nov-Dec;6(6):535-43 - PubMed
  14. Psychosom Med. 1978 Mar;40(2):99-106 - PubMed
  15. J Med Educ. 1979 Jun;54(6):498-500 - PubMed
  16. J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;5(1):34-41 - PubMed
  17. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1985-1986;15(1):61-73 - PubMed
  18. Psychosom Med. 1985 Mar-Apr;47(2):95-110 - PubMed
  19. N Engl J Med. 1983 May 5;308(18):1059-63 - PubMed
  20. Can J Psychiatry. 1985 Dec;30(8):602-4 - PubMed
  21. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1979 Dec;1(4):322-9 - PubMed
  22. Science. 1977 Apr 8;196(4286):129-36 - PubMed
  23. J Fam Pract. 1979 Sep;9(3):447-52 - PubMed
  24. Psychosomatics. 1989 Spring;30(2):213-23 - PubMed
  25. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1976-1977;7(4):295-307 - PubMed
  26. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1983 Dec;5(4):247-53 - PubMed
  27. J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Sep-Oct;4(5):421-31 - PubMed
  28. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1979 Sep;1(3):220-8 - PubMed
  29. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Feb;100(2):277-84 - PubMed
  30. Ann Intern Med. 1983 Nov;99(5):720-4 - PubMed
  31. J Med Educ. 1984 Jul;59(7):582-8 - PubMed
  32. Psychosomatics. 1984 May;25(5):401-4, 410 - PubMed
  33. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1982-1983;12(2):153-60 - PubMed
  34. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1988;18(2):107-21 - PubMed
  35. J Med Educ. 1971 Jul;46(7):620-2 - PubMed
  36. J Med Educ. 1986 Dec;61(12):982-4 - PubMed
  37. J Med Educ. 1980 Nov;55(11):962-4 - PubMed
  38. J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Mar-Apr;7(2):235-42 - PubMed
  39. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(4):213-7 - PubMed
  40. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1977-1978;8(4):361-70 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types