Cite
Cai W, Chen L, Zhang L, et al. Comparative Analysis of Three Different Optimization Procedures for Coronary Bifurcation Provisional Stenting: Insights from Micro-Computed Tomography and Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Bench Deployments. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2019;35(4):369-379doi: 10.6515/ACS.201907_35(4).20181122A.
Cai, W., Chen, L., Zhang, L., Fan, L., Chen, Z., Luo, Y., Zheng, X., Maritz, A., & Donovan, J. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Three Different Optimization Procedures for Coronary Bifurcation Provisional Stenting: Insights from Micro-Computed Tomography and Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Bench Deployments. Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 35(4), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.201907_35(4).20181122A
Cai, Wei, et al. "Comparative Analysis of Three Different Optimization Procedures for Coronary Bifurcation Provisional Stenting: Insights from Micro-Computed Tomography and Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Bench Deployments." Acta Cardiologica Sinica vol. 35,4 (2019): 369-379. doi: https://doi.org/10.6515/ACS.201907_35(4).20181122A
Cai W, Chen L, Zhang L, Fan L, Chen Z, Luo Y, Zheng X, Maritz A, Donovan J. Comparative Analysis of Three Different Optimization Procedures for Coronary Bifurcation Provisional Stenting: Insights from Micro-Computed Tomography and Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Bench Deployments. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2019 Jul;35(4):369-379. doi: 10.6515/ACS.201907_35(4).20181122A. PMID: 31371897; PMCID: PMC6656971.
Copy
Download .nbib