Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
Region-Specific Differences in Amyloid Precursor Protein Expression in the Mouse Hippocampus.

Frontiers in molecular neuroscience

Del Turco D, Paul MH, Schlaudraff J, Hick M, Endres K, Müller UC, Deller T.
PMID: 27965537
Front Mol Neurosci. 2016 Nov 29;9:134. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00134. eCollection 2016.

The physiological role of amyloid precursor protein (APP) has been extensively investigated in the rodent hippocampus. Evidence suggests that APP plays a role in synaptic plasticity, dendritic and spine morphogenesis, neuroprotection and-at the behavioral level-hippocampus-dependent forms of learning and...

Cite
Del Turco D, Paul MH, Schlaudraff J, et al. Region-Specific Differences in Amyloid Precursor Protein Expression in the Mouse Hippocampus. Front Mol Neurosci. 2016;9:134doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00134.
Del Turco, D., Paul, M. H., Schlaudraff, J., Hick, M., Endres, K., Müller, U. C., & Deller, T. (2016). Region-Specific Differences in Amyloid Precursor Protein Expression in the Mouse Hippocampus. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 9134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2016.00134
Del Turco, Domenico, et al. "Region-Specific Differences in Amyloid Precursor Protein Expression in the Mouse Hippocampus." Frontiers in molecular neuroscience vol. 9 (2016): 134. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2016.00134
Del Turco D, Paul MH, Schlaudraff J, Hick M, Endres K, Müller UC, Deller T. Region-Specific Differences in Amyloid Precursor Protein Expression in the Mouse Hippocampus. Front Mol Neurosci. 2016 Nov 29;9:134. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00134. eCollection 2016. PMID: 27965537; PMCID: PMC5126089.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Predictability of the individual clinical outcome of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for cellulite.

Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology

Schlaudraff KU, Kiessling MC, Császár NB, Schmitz C.
PMID: 24920933
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014 May 23;7:171-83. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S59851. eCollection 2014.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy has been successfully introduced for the treatment of cellulite in recent years. However, it is still unknown whether the individual clinical outcome of cellulite treatment with extracorporeal shock wave therapy can be predicted by...

Cite
Schlaudraff KU, Kiessling MC, Császár NB, et al. Predictability of the individual clinical outcome of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for cellulite. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014;7:171-83doi: 10.2147/CCID.S59851.
Schlaudraff, K. U., Kiessling, M. C., Császár, N. B., & Schmitz, C. (2014). Predictability of the individual clinical outcome of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for cellulite. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 7171-83. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S59851
Schlaudraff, Kai-Uwe, et al. "Predictability of the individual clinical outcome of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for cellulite." Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology vol. 7 (2014): 171-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CCID.S59851
Schlaudraff KU, Kiessling MC, Császár NB, Schmitz C. Predictability of the individual clinical outcome of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for cellulite. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014 May 23;7:171-83. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S59851. eCollection 2014. PMID: 24920933; PMCID: PMC4043818.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Author Correction: Puma and p21 represent cooperating checkpoints limiting self-renewal and chromosomal instability of somatic stem cells in response to telomere dysfunction.

Nature cell biology

Sperka T, Song Z, Morita Y, Nalapareddy K, Guachalla LM, Lechel A, Begus-Nahrmann Y, Burkhalter MD, Mach M, Schlaudraff F, Liss B, Ju Z, Speicher MR, Rudolph KL.
PMID: 33510409
Nat Cell Biol. 2021 Mar;23(3):292. doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00633-w.

No abstract available.

Cite
Sperka T, Song Z, Morita Y, et al. Author Correction: Puma and p21 represent cooperating checkpoints limiting self-renewal and chromosomal instability of somatic stem cells in response to telomere dysfunction. Nat Cell Biol. 2021;23(3):292doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00633-w.
Sperka, T., Song, Z., Morita, Y., Nalapareddy, K., Guachalla, L. M., Lechel, A., Begus-Nahrmann, Y., Burkhalter, M. D., Mach, M., Schlaudraff, F., Liss, B., Ju, Z., Speicher, M. R., & Rudolph, K. L. (2021). Author Correction: Puma and p21 represent cooperating checkpoints limiting self-renewal and chromosomal instability of somatic stem cells in response to telomere dysfunction. Nature cell biology, 23(3), 292. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-021-00633-w
Sperka, Tobias, et al. "Author Correction: Puma and p21 represent cooperating checkpoints limiting self-renewal and chromosomal instability of somatic stem cells in response to telomere dysfunction." Nature cell biology vol. 23,3 (2021): 292. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-021-00633-w
Sperka T, Song Z, Morita Y, Nalapareddy K, Guachalla LM, Lechel A, Begus-Nahrmann Y, Burkhalter MD, Mach M, Schlaudraff F, Liss B, Ju Z, Speicher MR, Rudolph KL. Author Correction: Puma and p21 represent cooperating checkpoints limiting self-renewal and chromosomal instability of somatic stem cells in response to telomere dysfunction. Nat Cell Biol. 2021 Mar;23(3):292. doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00633-w. PMID: 33510409.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Cellular Optimization of Nanofat: Comparison of Two Nanofat Processing Devices in Terms of Cell Count and Viability.

Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum

Cohen SR, Tiryaki T, Womack HA, Canikyan S, Schlaudraff KU, Scheflan M.
PMID: 33791619
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2019 Sep 29;1(4):ojz028. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojz028. eCollection 2019 Dec.

No abstract available.

Cite
Cohen SR, Tiryaki T, Womack HA, et al. Cellular Optimization of Nanofat: Comparison of Two Nanofat Processing Devices in Terms of Cell Count and Viability. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2019;1(4):ojz028doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojz028.
Cohen, S. R., Tiryaki, T., Womack, H. A., Canikyan, S., Schlaudraff, K. U., & Scheflan, M. (2019). Cellular Optimization of Nanofat: Comparison of Two Nanofat Processing Devices in Terms of Cell Count and Viability. Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 1(4), ojz028. https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojz028
Cohen, Steven R, et al. "Cellular Optimization of Nanofat: Comparison of Two Nanofat Processing Devices in Terms of Cell Count and Viability." Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum vol. 1,4 (2019): ojz028. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojz028
Cohen SR, Tiryaki T, Womack HA, Canikyan S, Schlaudraff KU, Scheflan M. Cellular Optimization of Nanofat: Comparison of Two Nanofat Processing Devices in Terms of Cell Count and Viability. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2019 Sep 29;1(4):ojz028. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojz028. eCollection 2019 Dec. PMID: 33791619; PMCID: PMC7780476.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries