Cite
Manning JT, Barley L, Walton J, et al. The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success. evidence for sexually antagonistic genes?. Evol Hum Behav. 2000;21(3):163-183doi: 10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00029-5.
Manning, J. T., Barley, L., Walton, J., Lewis-Jones, D. I., Trivers, R. L., Singh, D., Thornhill, R., Rohde, P., Bereczkei, T., Henzi, P., Soler, M., & Szwed, A. (2000). The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success. evidence for sexually antagonistic genes?. Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, 21(3), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00029-5
Manning, et al. "The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success. evidence for sexually antagonistic genes?." Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society vol. 21,3 (2000): 163-183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00029-5
Manning JT, Barley L, Walton J, Lewis-Jones DI, Trivers RL, Singh D, Thornhill R, Rohde P, Bereczkei T, Henzi P, Soler M, Szwed A. The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success. evidence for sexually antagonistic genes?. Evol Hum Behav. 2000 May 01;21(3):163-183. doi: 10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00029-5. PMID: 10828555.
Copy
Download .nbib