Display options
Share it on

Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2002 May;57(2):498-504. doi: 10.1265/jjh.57.498.

[Comparative study on objective-setting public health policy--historical background and path dependence].

Nihon eiseigaku zasshi. Japanese journal of hygiene

[Article in Japanese]
Yutaka Motohashi, Yosihiro Kaneko

Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, Akita University School of Medicine, 1-1-1, Hondo, Akita City 010-8543, Japan. [email protected]

PMID: 12061096 DOI: 10.1265/jjh.57.498

Abstract

The historical background and the path dependence of objective-setting public health policy are described in this review. The New Public Health movement appeared in the 1980s and was inspired by the Ottawa Charter on Health Promotion. This movement is based on the idea that public health is mostly promoted by creating a supportive environment for health as well as by individual efforts toward a healthy life style. The first objective-setting public health policy called Healthy People was proposed in USA, 1979, under the influence of The Lalonde Report published in Canada, 1974. Goals and targets were set in order to reduce the mortality of American people. This project led to Healthy People 2000 and Healthy People 2010. In the 1990s, objective-setting public health policies prevailed in Western countries, such as United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and also in Japan. The objective-setting public health policy is the application of the management by objectives in the health policy domain. This policy is especially accepted in Anglo-Saxon countries where public sector reform was conducted on the basis of the New Public Management theory in the 1980s, which is when the WHO Regional Office for Europe started the Healthy Cities project that emphasized a network of project cities. The Health 21 in 1999 is another model of object-setting public health policy. A comparative study of four different objective-setting public health policies (USA, United Kingdom, WHO Regional Office for Europe, and Japan) was conducted regarding the goals and domains of the targets, methods of targeting, and evaluation of the project. The goals were almost identical in the four public health policies, while the domains of the targets were different. These differences were explained by the past experience of public health policy development in each country.

MeSH terms

Publication Types