Display options
Share it on

BMJ. 2009 Jun 03;338:b1735. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1735.

Career progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: postal questionnaire surveys.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

Kathryn S Taylor, Trevor W Lambert, Michael J Goldacre

Affiliations

  1. UK Medical Careers Research Group, Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Oxford University, Oxford, OX3 7LF.

PMID: 19493938 PMCID: PMC2690619 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b1735

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the career progression of NHS doctors, comparing men and women.

DESIGN: Postal questionnaire surveys. Participants and setting Graduates of 1977, 1988, and 1993 from all UK medical schools.

RESULTS: The response rate was 68% (7012/10 344). Within general practice, 97% (1208/1243) of men, 99% (264/267) of women who had always worked full time throughout their career, and 87% (1083/1248) of all women were principals. Median times from qualification to principal status were 5.8 (95% confidence interval 5.6 to 6.0) years for men, 5.6 (5.4 to 5.8) years for women who had worked full time during training, and 6.8 (6.5 to 7.0) years for all women. Of the 1977 and 1988 graduates in hospital practice, 96% (1293/1347) of men were consultants, compared with 92% (276/299) of women who had always worked full time throughout their career and 67% (277/416) of women who had not. Median time to first consultant post was 11.7 (11.5 to 11.9) years for men, 11.3 (11.0 to 11.6) years for women who worked full time during training, and 12.3 (12.0 to 12.6) years for all women. Women who had not always worked full time throughout their career were over-represented in general practice and under-represented in most hospital specialties, substantially so in the surgical specialties and anaesthetics. Women who had always worked full time were under-represented not only in the surgical specialties but also in general practice.

CONCLUSIONS: Women not progressing as far and as fast as men was, generally, a reflection of not having always worked full time rather than their sex. The findings suggest that women do not generally encounter direct discrimination; however, the possibility that indirect discrimination, such as lack of opportunities for part time work, has influenced choice of specialty cannot be ruled out.

References

  1. Med Educ. 2000 Aug;34(8):602-7 - PubMed
  2. Hosp Med. 2001 Dec;62(12):778-9 - PubMed
  3. BMJ. 2008 Apr 5;336(7647):749 - PubMed
  4. Health Trends. 1988 Nov;20(4):101-9 - PubMed
  5. Med Educ. 2007 Sep;41(9):909-14 - PubMed
  6. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 20;355(3):310-2 - PubMed
  7. Surgery. 2002 Aug;132(2):415-9 - PubMed
  8. Arch Surg. 2000 Aug;135(8):972-7 - PubMed
  9. Heart. 2005 Mar;91(3):273-4 - PubMed
  10. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003 Dec;12(10):1009-18 - PubMed
  11. BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):468-9 - PubMed
  12. N Engl J Med. 1996 Oct 24;335(17):1282-9 - PubMed
  13. BMJ. 1990 Oct 27;301(6758):961-4 - PubMed
  14. Med Educ. 1999 Jan;33(1):28-33 - PubMed
  15. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 May 10;6:56 - PubMed
  16. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jan;54(1):10-6 - PubMed
  17. BMJ. 1996 Jul 6;313(7048):19-24 - PubMed
  18. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Aug 3;141(3):205-12 - PubMed
  19. Med Educ. 2001 Feb;35(2):139-47 - PubMed
  20. BMJ. 1993 Mar 20;306(6880):735-6 - PubMed
  21. BMJ. 2005 Sep 10;331(7516):569-72 - PubMed
  22. BMJ. 2006 Jan 21;332(7534):148-51 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support