Display options
Share it on

BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Sep 17;10:S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S9-S3.

Network analysis of genes regulated in renal diseases: implications for a molecular-based classification.

BMC bioinformatics

Suresh K Bhavnani, Felix Eichinger, Sebastian Martini, Paul Saxman, H V Jagadish, Matthias Kretzler

Affiliations

  1. Center for Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Dr, Domino's Farm, Lobby L, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0738, USA. [email protected]

PMID: 19761573 PMCID: PMC2745690 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S9-S3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic renal diseases are currently classified based on morphological similarities such as whether they produce predominantly inflammatory or non-inflammatory responses. However, such classifications do not reliably predict the course of the disease and its response to therapy. In contrast, recent studies in diseases such as breast cancer suggest that a classification which includes molecular information could lead to more accurate diagnoses and prediction of treatment response. This article describes how we extracted gene expression profiles from biopsies of patients with chronic renal diseases, and used network visualizations and associated quantitative measures to rapidly analyze similarities and differences between the diseases.

RESULTS: The analysis revealed three main regularities: (1) Many genes associated with a single disease, and fewer genes associated with many diseases. (2) Unexpected combinations of renal diseases that share relatively large numbers of genes. (3) Uniform concordance in the regulation of all genes in the network.

CONCLUSION: The overall results suggest the need to define a molecular-based classification of renal diseases, in addition to hypotheses for the unexpected patterns of shared genes and the uniformity in gene concordance. Furthermore, the results demonstrate the utility of network analyses to rapidly understand complex relationships between diseases and regulated genes.

References

  1. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2007;:76-87 - PubMed
  2. Bioinformatics. 2005 Dec 1;21(23):4205-8 - PubMed
  3. Nat Genet. 2007 Nov;39(11):1338-49 - PubMed
  4. Blood. 2005 Jan 15;105(2):821-6 - PubMed
  5. BMC Med. 2006 Jun 30;4:16 - PubMed
  6. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2008 Dec;9(4):267-74 - PubMed
  7. Clin Genet. 2007 Jan;71(1):1-11 - PubMed
  8. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Jun;18(6):1765-76 - PubMed
  9. Nature. 2002 Jan 31;415(6871):530-6 - PubMed
  10. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:140 - PubMed
  11. Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Dec;18(12):1257-61 - PubMed
  12. Science. 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):531-7 - PubMed
  13. Genome Res. 2008 Apr;18(4):644-52 - PubMed
  14. J Proteome Res. 2008 Apr;7(4):1508-17 - PubMed
  15. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001 Nov;38(5):1026-37 - PubMed
  16. Phys Rev Lett. 2004 Nov 19;93(21):218701 - PubMed
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 22;104(21):8685-90 - PubMed
  18. Nature. 2001 Mar 8;410(6825):268-76 - PubMed
  19. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:124 - PubMed
  20. Kidney Int. 2004 Feb;65(2):420-30 - PubMed
  21. J Med Genet. 2006 Aug;43(8):691-8 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support